Humans in Universe

6 Appendix I

Chapter 6
Appendix I

2Selections from Buckminster Fuller’s ‘‘How Little I Know’’ (1966)

3 (First published in the Saturday Review, November 12, 1966, pp. 29--31, 67--70. This version is from Fuller’s And It Came to Pass Not to Stay. New York: Mac

4 millan Publishing Co., 1976.)

5 ‘‘Tell me

6 In five thousand

7 Written words’’—

8 (Equivalent, at my oral rate,

9 To three-quarters of an hour’s discourse) ‘‘What you have learned—In your lifetime,’’

10 Said Norman Cousins.

11 ‘‘That ought to be easy,’’ said I.

12 Three weeks have gone by—

13 I recall that

14 Thirty-eight years ago I invented a routine Somewhat similar to Muscle development Accomplished through A day-by-day lifting

15 Of progressively heavier weights.

16 But my new

17 Intellectual routine

18 Dealt with the weightless process Of human thought development Which subject is

19 Known to the scholars As epistemology.

20 And I have learned

21 That such words as Epistemology

22 Stop most of humanity

23 From pursuing

24 Such important considerations

25 As the development

26 Of the thought processes.

27 So my new discipline

28 Was invented for dealing

29 Even with the ephemeral Which word means

30 Conceptual but weightless— As is for instance

31 The concept of circularity.

32 My new strategy required That on successive days

33 I ask myself

34 A progressively larger

35

36And more inclusive question Which must be answered

37Only in the terms of Experience.

38Hearsaids, beliefs, axioms, Superstitions, guesses, opinions Were and are

39 All excluded

40 As answer resources

41 For playing my particular Intellectual development game.

42 However, when lacking Any possible experience clues I saw that it was ineffectual To attempt to answer

43 Such questions as for instance

44 ‘‘Why I?’’

45 Or

46 ‘‘Why …

47 Anything?’’

48 And because it was my experience That some individuals

49 Proved as persistently faithful In reporting their experiences to me As were my own senses The rules of my game permitted My inclusion of such individuals’ Directly reported experiences In my inventory of experiences For use in my progressively Great and greater Self-questioned answering.

50 In playing that game

51 I soon came

52 To what I assumed to be both The largest askable and The largest answerable Question:

53 ‘‘What do you mean,’’

54 I asked myself, ‘‘By the word Universe?

55 If you can’t answer

56 In terms of

57 Direct experience You must desist From the further use Of the word UNIVERSE For, to you It will have become Meaningless!’’

58

59The 20th century physicists, In defining physical Universe As consisting only of energy, Deliberately excluded metaphysical Universe—Because the metaphysical

60Consists only of imponderables, Whereas the physical scientists Deal only with ponderables—Wherefore their physical Universe Excluded for instance

61 All our thoughts—

62 Because thoughts are weightless—

63 But thoughts are experiences—Wherefore I saw

64 That to be adequate

65 To the intuitively formulated

66 And experience-founded controls

67 Of my ever bigger

68 Question and answer routine,

69 My answering definition

70 Of UNIVERSE

71 Must be one which

72 Embraced the combined

73

74Metaphysical and physical Components of UNIVERSE.

75Thus my self-formulating answer emerged, And has persisted unshattered

76 By any subsequent challenges

77 From myself or others

78 As:

79 ‘‘By Universe I mean:

80

81The aggregate of all humanity’s Consciously apprehended And communicated

82 (To self or others)

83 Experiences.’’

84

85And later I discovered that Eddington had said ‘‘Science is: The conscientious attempt To set in order The facts of Experience.’’

86And I also discovered That Ernst Mach—The great Viennese physicist, Whose name is used To designate flight velocity In speed of sound increments, Known as Mach numbers—Said:

87‘‘Physics is: Experience Arranged in Most economical order.’’

88So I realized that

89Both Eddington and Mach Were seeking to put in order The same ‘‘raw materials’’ —I. e. Experiences— With which to identify Their special subsystems Of UNIVERSE.

90Wherefore I realized that All the words in all dictionaries Are the consequent tools Of all men’s conscious And conscientious attempts To communicate All their experiences—Which is of course To communicate Universe.

91There are forty-three thousand current words In the Concise Oxford Dictionary.

92 We don’t know who invented them!

93 What an enormous, anonymous inheritance!

94

95Shakespeare used ten thousand of them With which to formulate

96 His complete ‘‘works.’’

97

98It would take many more volumes Than Shakespeare’s to employ The forty-three thousand —Logically and cogently.

99 In a five thousand word article

100 I would probably have use for

101 Only one thousand.

102 Are forty-two thousand

103 Of these words

104 Superficial and extraneous

105 In reporting on

106 What I have learned?

107 I have learned that

108 You would think so

109 If you ever saw a magazine’s

110 Space rewrite editor

111 At work on my work!

112 I’m not inclined to use

113 The word ‘‘Creativity’’

114 In respect to human beings;

115 What is usually spoken of as creativity

116

117Is really a unique and unprecedented Human employment of principles Which exist a priori in the Universe.

118I think man is a very extra-ordinary Part of the Universe

119 For he demonstrates unique capability In the discovery and intellectual identification Of the operative principles of Universe—Which though unconsciously employed Have not been hitherto differentiated, Isolated out and understood As being principles, By other biological species.

120 Rejecting the word ‘‘creativity’’ For use by any other than The great intellectual integrity Progressively disclosed as conceiving Both comprehensively and anticipatorily The complex interpatternings

121 Of reciprocal and transformative freedoms In pure principle

122 Which apparently govern Universe And constitute the verb god, I go along with the 5,000-year-old Philosophy of the Bhagavad-Gita Which says ‘‘Action is the product Of the qualities inherent in nature. It is only the ignorant man, Who, misled by personal egotism, Says ‘I am the doer.’ ’’ I am most impressed

123 With the earliest recorded philosophic statements By unknown individuals of India and China. Through millenniums the philosophies Have become progressively Compromised and complicated.

124 I am an explorer, however, Of the generalized design science principles Which seemingly differentiate Man from animal

125 And mind from brain.

126 The word ‘‘generalization’’ As used in the literary sense, Means ‘‘a very broad statement.’’ It suggests covering too much territory—Too thinly to be sound.

127 The literary men say ‘‘This is too general.’’

128 In the mathematical sense, The meaning of generalization Is quite different.

129 The mathematician or the physicist Looks for principles which are Persistently operative in nature, Which will hold true in every special case. If you can find principles That hold true in every case, Then you have discovered What the scientist calls A generalized principle.

130 The conscious detection of

131

132Generalized principles which hold true Under all conditions

133And their abstraction from any and all Special case experiences of the principles

  • Is probably unique to humans.
134

135By abstraction, I mean an idealized, ‘‘Empty set’’ statement

136 Such as, for instance, one of my own!

  • ‘‘Tension and compression are only coexistent’’
  • E. g., when you tense a rope

137 Its girth contracts—ergo compresses.

138

139When you compress a sphere’s polar axis, Its equatorial girth expands and tenses, It is inconceivable that a dog

140 Tugging at its leash at one time

141 And, compressing its teeth

142 On a bone at another time,

143 Should formulate consciously

144 The generalized

145 ‘‘Only coexistence of tension and compression,’’ Though the dog is subconsciously coordinate In tension-compression tactics.

146 To generalize further than

147 ‘‘Tension and compression are only coexistent,’’

148 We may say that ‘‘plus and minus

149 Only coexist’’

150 And generalize even further

151 By saying ‘‘Functions only coexist.’’

152 Then there is an even more powerful

153 And intellectually more exalted stage

154 Of generalization of principles

155 And that is the generalization

156 Of a complex of generalizations

  • Such as—unity is plural and at minimum two
  • Which combines the generalized law

157 Of the coexistence only of functions With the theory of number.

158 In turn we discover the generalizations

159 Governing the associative powers

160 Of the nucleus and of the weak interactions

161 For the unity is two

162 Of the congruent, convex and concave spheres

163 As evidenceable in the generalized laws

164 Disclosed conceptually, arithmetically, and geometrically In synergetics.

165 I am certain that what we speak of

166 As human morality

167 Is a form of tentative generalization

168 Of principles underlying

169

170Special case experiences of human potentials, Behaviors, actions, reactions and resultants. Man has also the unique ability To employ generalized principles

171 —Once recognized—

172 In a consciously selective variety

173 Of special case interrelationships.

174 The whole regenerative process

175 Of intellectual discovery

176 And specialized use of generalized principles

177 Is known as teleology.

178 Teleology embraces

179

180The theory of communication, Though as yet having special case limitations.

181 It is a hypothetical

182 Approach to pure, abstract generalization

183 To say that teleology

184 Is only intuitively initiated by humans.

185 Intuition alerts brain

186 To first apprehend

187 And then recognize

188 Each special case experience

189 Within some minimum number

190 Of special case recognitions.

191 Intuition alerts mind

192 To comprehend, and

193 Formulate conceptually

194 The abstract generalization

195 Of a principle recognized

196 As operative in all the special cases.

197 Intuition alerts brain to

198

199The objectively employable generalized principle In hitherto unexperienced special case Circumstances inexplicably remote

200 From the earlier set of

201

202Special case experiences within which

203The generalized principles were first experienced Before their generalization Occurred in the mind.

204 Teleology - as part

205 Of communications theory

206 Relates to the pursuit of truth.

207 As entropy and antientropy.

208 It may be that

209 Communications theory

210 May be mathematically equated

211 With electrical

212 Transmission theory

213 Whereby the higher

214 The meaning or voltage

215 The more efficient

216 And longer distance

217 Communication attainable.

218 Based on experiments

219 With any and all systems,

220 The second law of thermodynamics

221

222Predicts the inexorable energy loss Known as ENTROPY.

223 Because the escaping energy

224 Does so diffusely,

225 In all directions,

226 Entropy is also known

227 Mathematically

228 As ‘‘The Law of Increase

229 Of the Random Element.’’

230 Before it had been discovered

231 By rigorous experimentation

232 That light has a velocity

233 It was erroneously assumed

234 To be ‘‘self-evident’’

235

236That light was instantaneous - That all stars in the sky Were ‘‘right there now’’ In exact geometrical pattern, Being seen instantaneously And simultaneously

237By all who looked their way.

238But since Michelson’s measurement Of light’s speed We have learned that The light from the Sun, Our nearest star, Takes eight minutes To reach us here on Earth. From our next nearest star Light takes two years To reach our planet Earth. And other stars Are so far away Their light takes millions Of years and more To reach us.

239Assuming instant-Universe Classical Newtonian science Also assumed that Universe Must be an instant system—A simultaneous unit machine, In which every part Must be affecting Every other part, In varying degrees But in simultaneous unity. They assumed also that the Unit and simultaneous universe

240Must of course obey

241The great second law

242Of thermodynamics Whose, inexorable, Entropic energy loss Required self-dissipation And ultimately utter Self-annihilation

243 Of Universe.

244

245‘‘Running down’’ they called it Wherever ‘‘down’’ may be.

246 Though light’s speed

247

248Of seven hundred million miles per hour Is fast

249 It isn’t anywhere nearly as fast

250 As ‘‘instant’’—

251

252Which means reaching anywhere ‘‘In no time at all.’’

253Ergo, the Einsteinians Instituted experiments To ascertain the behavioral characteristics Of a physical universe comprised Of only partially overlapping, Progressively intertransforming, Nonsimultaneous, energy events.

254The Einsteinian Era scientists’ experiments Showed that entropic energies Accomplished their disassociations here Only through associations there - That is by regrouping elsewhere. Thus early 20th-century scientists Found the intertransformative Energy quanta transactions, To be eventually,

255But not always immediately, One hundred percent accountable.

256 As a consequence of

257 The Einsteinians’ experiments

258

259The eighteenth and nineteenth centuries’ Concept of a continually

260 Self-dissipating universe

261 Had to be abandoned

262 And in its place was established

263 The, experimentally required,

264 Law of Conservation of Energy

265 Which states that energy

266 May be neither created nor lost;

267 Ergo the energetic Universe

268 Is the minimum,

269 But nonsimultaneously realized,

270

271Energy exchanging system, Which is to say

272That physical Universe,

273 As experimentally demonstrated

274 Is the minimum and only

275 Perpetual motion process,

276

277Which as an aggregate of finite, Dissimilar and nonsimultaneous Energy events

278 Is in itself

279 Sum totally finite.

280 All the foregoing

281 Dissipates the foundations

282 Of the Newtonian world’s

283 Cosmogony and economics

284 Which assumed

285

286That a ‘‘running down world’’ Suggested the prudence

287 Of saving, conserving and hoarding;

288

289And that those who spent Were fools who would perish As resources dwindled.

290Though entropically irreversible Every action

291Has its reaction and resultant, And every nuclear component Has its positive or negative Behavioral opposite Which is however

292Not its mirror image.

293And the irreversible situations Give an evolutionary direction To otherwise stalemated Conditions of physical Universe.

294For instance it is discovered That wealth, whatever else it may be, Cannot alter an iota of yesterday And can alter only The present and forward Metabolic regeneration Conditions of humanity.

295Song of the Dead And the Quick—Newton was a noun And Einstein is a verb. Einstein’s norm makes Newton’s norm INSTANT UNIVERSE, Absurd.

296‘‘A body persists In a state of rest Or—

297Except as affected—’’ Thus grave stones are erected!

298 Nonsimultaneous, physical Universe Is Energy; and ‘‘Energy equals mass Times the second power

299 Of the speed of light.’’ No exceptions!

300 Fission verified Einstein’s hypothesis—Change is normal

301 Thank you Albert!

302 Irreversible verse. Einstein’s intellect

303 Defined energy as E = me2 Energy cannot define intellect.

304 Intellect the metaphysical Is comprehensive to Energy the physical.

305 While Universe is finite Energy is definite Because definable Energy is XY.

306 Intellect is O.

307 The wealth of Earthians Is irreversible.

308 Wealth cannot alter yesterday’s experience.

309 It can only alter today’s and tomorrow’s experiences. It can buy

310 Forward time in which intellect May scientifically explore for The orderly interrelationships

311 Disclosed in yesterday’s experiences Which can be employed by intellect To forecast

312 Anticipatory and orderly rearrangements of tomorrow By technological transformations Of the physical energy environments, Events and circumstances.

313 Wealth is the organized and operative

314 Tools and energy capability

315 To sustain man’s forward metabolic regeneration;

316 To physically protect him;

317 To increase his knowledge

318 And degrees of freedom

319 While decreasing his interfrustrations.

320 Solo wealth is to commonwealth

321 As X is to X4.

322 Wealth is: Energy compounded With intellect’s know-how.

323 Every time man uses his know-how

324 His experience increases

325 And his intellectual advantage

326 Automatically increases.

327 Because of its conservation

328 Energy cannot decrease.

329 Know-how can only increase.

330 It is therefore scientifically clear

331 That:—wealth which combines

332 Energy and intellect

333 Can only increase, and that wealth can

334 Increase only with use

335 And that wealth increases As fast as it is used.

336 The faster—the more!

337 Wealth is accountable as

338 The inanimate energies shunted

339 Onto the ends of industrial levers

340 Whose physical capability is

341 Stateable in forward, automated,

342 Man days of travel miles

343 With first class comprehensive services

344 Including food, lodging, clothing,

345 Amusements, communication, information

346 And medical services

347

348Based on the average physical experiences Of a top civil service rating’s World travel involvements.

349Has man a function

350In Universe?

351In dynamical balance With the inside-outing, Expanding universe Of radiant stars, Man witnesses

352Radiantly dormant Earth as A collecting or outside-inning, Contracting phase, of Universe. Earth receives and stores, A continually increasing inventory Of sun and star emanating radiation In its lethal-energy-concentrates Sifting, sorting and accumulating Spherical Van Allen belts.

353In addition to the Van Allen belts The succession of Earth’s concentric Spherical mantles, e. g., The ionosphere, troposphere et al., Constitute an extraordinary series Of discrete filters for

354The random-to-orderly sorting, Shunting, partially accumulating And final inwardly forwarding Of the benign radiation residues To the biosphere stage Of Earth’s continual and orderly Processing of its discrete share Of the expanding-Universe-propagated Energy income receipts.

355 Earth also receives daily

356 Additional thousands of tons

357

358Of expanding-Universe-dispatched Stardust.

359 This concentration around Earth’s surface

360 Of the Universe-deposited dust

361

362Apparently consists of 91 of the 92 regeneratively patterning

363 Chemical elements

364

365In approximately the same systematic order Of relative abundance of those elements

366As the relative abundance

367Of those same elements

368 As they are found to occur

369 In the thus far inventoried

370 Reaches of Universe.

371 The biological life on earth

372 Is inherently antientropic

373 For it negotiates the chemical sorting

374 Out of the Earth’s crust’s

375 Chemical elements inventory

376 And rearranges the atoms

377 In elegantly ordered

378 Molecular compound patternings.

379 Of all the biological antientropics,

380 I. e. random-to-orderly arrangers,

381 Man’s intellect is by much

382

383The most active, exquisite and effective agent Thus far in evidence in Universe.

384Through intellect, man constantly succeeds

385 In inventing technological means

386 Of doing ever more orderly

387 I. e., more efficient,

388 ‘‘Better sorted-out,’’

389 Local Universe, energy tasks

390 With ever less units of investments

391

392Of the (what may be only apparently), ‘‘Randomly’’ occurring

393 Resources of energy,

394 As atomic matter,

395 Or energy as channeled electromagnetics.

396 To guarantee

397 All of life’s

398 Antientropic functioning,

399 Intellectual integrity Universe

400

401Which has designedly arranged the great game Has also arranged that mankind, Like all the other living species, Has its ultra-shortsighted, Built-in, ‘‘desire’’ drives,

402Its romantic conception ambitions And protectively colored self deceits, As well as its longer distance ‘‘needs,’’ All of which cause each species To pursue its particular ‘‘honey’’ With its particular rose-colored glasses, As does the bumblebee Which at the same time

403Inadvertently and unconsciously performs Myriads of other tasks, Designed with fabulous

404Scientific capability by nature,

405Which inadvertent interco-ordinate tasks Unknown to the separate creature species Are all essential to realization Of the regenerative continuance Of the much larger

406Survival support conditions For the generalized

407Ecological system of ‘‘all life.’’

408 It is part of

409

410The comprehensively anticipating, Design science of life

411That the bumblebee’s self-unviewed, Unwitting, bumbling tail

412Bumps into and knocks off male pollen, Which it later

413And again inadvertently,

414Knocks off upon the female botanical organs, Thus unconsciously participating in A vastly complex ecological interaction Of the many energy processing Bio-chemical ‘‘gears’’ Of the total life system Dynamically constituted by All the living species.

415The myriad inadvertencies Of all the living species Have sum totally provided A metabolically sustaining And regenerative topsoil process Which—it is realized now, But only by

416Our retrospectively gained knowledge—

417Has kept man

418Regeneratively alive on Earth For at least two million years, While ever improving His physical survival advantages And increasing his longevity.

419This vast ‘‘game playing’’ of life Has also indirectly occasioned Not only the regenerative multiplication Of human beings,

420But also a progressively increasing Percentage who survive in conditions Of ever improving Physical advantage.

421I think man is very properly concerned About that which he does not understand.

422I don’t think that it is the machine per se That bothers man;

423 It is just not understanding

424 Anything

425 That disturbs him.

426 When an accident bares

427

428Portions of human organs Familiar only to doctors, Those organs look foreign And frightening to people. Stick your tongue way out Before a mirror.

429 It is a strange looking device.

430 If existing originally and

431

432Transcendentally as psyches only, Individuals had to choose, And assemble their own sets Of organic parts,

433Having been assured of mortal incarnation And of mortal ‘‘honey chasing’’ experiences But only after successful selection And completion of the assembly—And were endowed—as psyches—Only with an aesthetic Sense of selectivity,

434Being devoid of any understanding Of either the separate or integrated Functions of those parts—No humans would merger

435Those co-operatively functioning parts Into mortal beings

436 For no part of the ‘‘guts’’

437 Would be chosen.

438

439Nature had to skin over the regenerative Chemistry and physics controls, With an aesthetically intriguing, Pseudo-static, sculptural baby doll unity In order to trick the immortal psyches Into the problem-beset,

440Temporary occupation

441Of such humid process regenerative machines As those of the humans.

442I have learned

443That man knows little

444And thinks he knows a lot.

445I am the most unlearned man I know.

446I don’t know anyone

447Who has learned

448How little one knows

449As have I.

450But that does not belittle

451The little I seem to know,

452And I have confidence

453In the importance of remembering

454How little we know

455And of the possible significance Of the fact that we prosper, And at sometimes even enjoy Life in Universe

456Despite the designed-in littleness That we have to ‘‘get by with.’’

457 What the astronomers rank as

458 The nearest bright star to Earth

459 Is ‘‘Rigel Kent’’

460

461Which is three hundred thousand times Further away from earth than is the Sun. It is easy to see a man

462 One third of a mile away and

463 We were surprised when young

464 To see a man

465 At that distance

466 Swinging a sledge

467 To drive a post into the ground

468 And to realize

469 That the sound of his maul

470 Hitting the post top

471 Registered in our brain

472 As reported through the ears

473 Four seconds later

474 Than had the visual news

475 Which ‘‘long since’’ had told us

476 That he had once more

477 Hit the post.

478 Through physical experiments

479

480Performed by our scientists

481We have learned that

482The highest known velocity

483Among physical phenomena

484Is the speed of light and all radiation Relayingly scanned by nerve lines To our brain’s television conceptualizing Through the optics of our eyes.

485 Because the speed of light

486

487Is approximately 186,000 miles per second, And the Moon is

488About twice that distance Away from Earth.

489 If we had a large mirror on the Moon,

490 And we flashed a powerful

491 Light toward the Moon

492 It would take four seconds

493 For the light to be reflected back

494 To our eyes.

495 That is, the light takes

496 Two seconds to get to the Moon

497 And two more seconds

498 To return to Earth.

499 And the overall four seconds lag

500 Of the visual report

501 Is the same time lag as that in

502 Our childhood realized lag

503 Of the sound report

504 Behind the visual report

505 Of the post-sledging event.

506 Because the light coming to Earth

507 From the Moon

508 Takes two seconds to make the trip,

509 And because the light

510 Coming to Earth from the Sun

511 Takes eight and one-half minutes,

512 And because the light coming to us from Rigel Kent

513 Takes four and one-half years,

514 We all see a live show

515 Taking place in the sky

516 Four and one-half

517 Years ago.

518 And as we gaze around

519 The starry heavens

520 We see right now

521 Live shows of ‘‘yesterdays’’

522 Ranging from millions to sextillions of years ago,

523 As we look at the stars

524 We see all of history

525 Now alive.

526

527It took only two million years and Four and one-half billion human babies To establish a human survival beachhead Aboard the little Eight-thousand-mile-diameter Spherical Spaceship EARTH

528Whereby life could successfully realize Its highest known potential life span Possibly to continue indefinitely As one self-rejuvenation generation. Few of the stars we look at, Live-starring out there, Are young enough To witness

529 Those first human events

530 Taking place on Earth

531 Only two millions of years ago.

532

533Since all the vital parts Of human organisms Have now become interchangeable, And many of them

534Have also become interchangeable With inanimate mechanical parts, And since human longevity Is continually increasing There is a good possibility That humanity is developing A continuous human

535 Who will persist in prime health

536 And youthful vigor.

537

538With the lessening of need To replenish the population With fresh baby starts,

539The built-in drives to procreate Will lessen and be manifest in a proclivity Of females to camouflage as male And males to camouflage as female Thus suppressing the procreative urge By superficial antipathetic illusions, While permitting and promoting Procreatively innocuous sex companionships.

540Despite their billionfold numbers Babies and very young children Soon after their arrival on earth Have uttered and continue to utter Spontaneous comments and questions—Concerning life on Earth And in Universe—

541Which are so economical And uniquely fresh

542In viewpoint and formulation

543As to be pure poetry Apparently proving that Poetry is inexhaustible;

544To which their sophisticated

545And surprised off-guard adult audience Cliche unpoetically ‘‘Oh how cute.’’

546In the year 1964

547The one hundred largest Industrial giant corporations, Born and reared

548In the United States of America Invested four out of five

549Of their new plant and equipment Expansion dollars

550In production and service facilities In world lands outside the U.S.A.

551 This trending to World identity only

552 Of the industrial giants

553 Held true also not only with thousands

554 Of lesser magnitude

555 U.S.A, and European born

556 Limited liability industrial organizations

557 But also with the Communist countries’

558 Giant industrial organizations.

559 Wherefore world industrialization trends swiftly—

560 And altogether transcendentally

561 To man’s conscious planning—

562 Into an unitarily co-ordinate

563 World giant

564 With built-in automated,

565 Research fed,

566 Computer analyzed and selected,

567 Evolutionary self-improving

568 And self-transforming

569 Through alternatingly regenerated

570 Competitive precessioning

571

572Of all the variable functions Of general systems theory.

573 TRUTH

574 I have learned that truth

575 Is an omnipresent, omnidirectional,

576 Evolutionary awareness,

577

578One of whose myriadly multiplying facets Discloses that there are no ‘‘absolutes’’ -No ‘‘ends in themselves’’—no ‘‘things’’ -Only transitionally transformative verbing.

579 It seems possible to me

580

581That God may be recognizable In man’s limited intellection

582 Only as the weightless passion drive

583

584Which inspires our progressive searching For the—momentarily only -

585And only most-truthful-thus-far-possible—Comprehension of all the interconnections

586 Of all experiences.

587 It seems then to me

588

589That the nearer we come to understanding, The nearer we come to the

590 Orderly omni-interrelationships

591 Of all the weightless complex

592 Of all generalized principles

593 Which seem to be disclosed to us

594 As so important

595 As to be tentatively identified as God.

596

597For it is the integratable interrelationships Of all the generalized laws

598Which apparently govern

599The great verb ‘‘Universe’’

600 Of the vastly greater

601

602—Because comprehensively anticipatory - Verb intellecting

603Which verb of optimum understanding May be ‘‘God’’.

604 It seems that Truth

605 Is progressive approximation

606 In which the relative fraction

607

608Of our spontaneously tolerated residual error Constantly diminishes.

609 This is a typical

610

611Antientropy proclivity of man—Entropy being the law

612 Of increase of the random element.

613

614Heisenberg’s indeterminism, In which the act of measuring Always alters the measured, Would seem entropic were it not For the experimentally realized knowledge That the successive alterations Of the observed Diminish

615As both our tooling and instrumentation Continually improve;

616Ergo intellection’s effect

617Upon measurement and the measured

618Is a gap closing,

619And the pursuit of more truthful comprehension Is successfully antientropic.

620Before Heisenberg, T. S. Eliot said, ‘‘Examination of history alters history’’ And Ezra Pound,

621 And even earlier poets,

622 Reported their discoveries

623

624That in one way or another The act of thinking alters thought itself.

625 When we ask ourself

626 ‘‘What have we learned?’’

627 We feel at first

628 That the answer is ‘‘nothing.’’

629

630But as soon as we say so We recall exceptions.

631For instance we have learned

632To test experimentally

633 The axioms given to us

634 As ‘‘educational’’ springboards, and

635 We have found

636

637That most of the ‘‘springboards’’ Do not spring

638 And some never existed.

639

640As for instance Points, holes, Solids, surfaces, Straight lines, planes, ‘‘Instantaneous,’’ ‘‘simultaneous,’’

641Things, nouns, ‘‘Up,’’ ‘‘down,’’ ‘‘at rest’’

642The words ‘‘artificial’’ and ‘‘failure’’ Are all meaningless.

643For what they aver

644Is experimentally ‘‘non-existent.’’

645If nature permits a formulation It is natural.

646If nature’s laws of behavior Do not permit formulation The latter does not occur. Whatever can be done Is natural,

647No matter how grotesque, boring, Unfamiliar or unprecedented.

648 In the same way

649 Nature never ‘‘fails.’’

650

651Nature complies with her own laws. Nature is the law.

652When man lacks understanding Of nature’s laws

653And a man-contrived structure Buckles unexpectedly, It does not fail.

654It only demonstrates that man Did not understand

655Nature’s laws and behaviors. Nothing failed.

656Man’s knowledge or estimating Was inadequate.

657The second law of thermodynamics—Entropy—is also as we have learned The law of increase of the Random Element I. e., every system loses energy—but Synergy means

658 Behavior of whole systems

659 Unpredicted by

660 The behavior of any separate part.

661 EN-ergy behaves entropically.

662 SYN-ergy behaves syntropically.

663 God is entropy

664 And God is syntropy,

665 God is synergy.

666 God is energy.

667 And God is always

668 • A verb—

669

670The verbing of Integrity.

671I assume that the physical Universe is definite And the metaphysical Universe is finite.

672 What men have called infinite

673 I call finite

674 And what men called finite

675 I call definite—i.e., definitive.

676 By my philosophy

677 The finite, but imponderable

678 Metaphysical Universe

679

680Embraces the definite, Ponderable, physical Universe. Finite is not unitarily conceptual. Definite is unitarily conceptual.

681 I have mathematical proof

682 That the difference between the sums

683 Of all the angles around all the surface vertices

684 Of any conceptual, definitive physical system

685 And the finite but non-conceptual metaphysical universe

686 Is always 720 degrees

687 Or a difference of only one

688 Definitive tetrahedron,

689 Therefore, the combined

690 Physical and metaphysical Universe is finite.

691 You can’t buy anything worthwhile

692 Like spontaneous love or understanding.

693 Though metaphysically finite

694 These are imponderables.

695 The absolute would be

696 Nontransformable, static and weighable.

697 Ergo, experimentally meaningless.

698 Infinity is only local

699 And occurs within definite systems,

700 As for instance

701 Following a great circle

702 Around a sphere

703 Which because of the fact

704 That lines—

705 Which occur experimentally

706 Only as energy vectors—

707 Cannot go through

708 The same point

709 At the same time—

710 Due to interference,

711 Which means also that lines

712 As curves

713 Cannot re-enter, or

714 ‘‘Join back into themselves,’’

715 Therefore, the circling line

716 Can only wrap around

717 And over its earlier part—

718 As the knot-making

719 Sailor says it,

720 The circle when followed

721 Around and around

722 Results in a coil

723 Which is an endless scenario—

724 An asymmetric spiral,

725 Which may be followed experimentally

726 Only as long as intellect is interested.

727 Not being simultaneous

728 Universe cannot consist of one function.

729 Functions only coexist.

730 Universe while finite is not definable.

731 I can define many of its parts

732 But I cannot define simultaneously

733 The nonsimultaneously occurring

734 Aggregate of partially overlapping experiences

735 Whose total set of local scenario relationships

736 Constitutes the whole Universe

737 Though the latter as an aggregate of finites

738 Is finite.

739 All the words

740 In all the dictionaries, as noted before,

741 Represent all of humanity’s attempts

742 To express the aggregate of experiences—Universe.

743 And while the dictionaries are finite

744 All the words

745 In all the dictionaries

746 Cannot be read simultaneously

747 And there is not one

748 Simultaneous sentence

749 Inherent and readable

750 In all the words.

751 In the same way

752 All the nonsimultaneous experiences

753 May not be conceived

754 And expressed as

755 A simultaneous system.

756 Ergo, there is no thinkable and logical Simultaneous conception

757 Of nonsimultaneous Universe.

758 There is strong awareness

759 That we have been overproducing

760 The army of rigorously disciplined

761 Scientific, game playing, academic specialists Who through hard work

762 And suppressed imagination

763 Earn their Ph. D.s

764 And automatic contracts

765 With prime contractors

766 At fifteen thousand dollars

767 Per year—and more—

768 Only to have their specialized field

769 Become obsolete and by-passed in five years, By severely altered techniques, instruments And exploratory stratagems.

770 Despite their honor grades

771 They prove not to be

772 The Natural Philosophers

773 And scientist-artists, implied by their Ph. D.s But just deluxe quality Technicians or mechanics.

774 And a myriad

775 Of emergency committees—

776 Multiplying swiftly

777 From one or two

778 Emergency Committees

779 Appointed by the President,

780 Have altogether discovered

781 That what the

782 Ph. D. scientists lack -

783 To adapt themselves to change

784 Has been officially pronounced to be

785 ‘‘Creativity,’’

786 But to my thinking

787 They lack the unique capability of mind—

788 Which is the ability not only to generalize

789 And to integrate a complex

790 Of pure generalizations

791 But also to project teleologically—

792 With fundamental understanding—

793 In any special case direction.

794 Fundamental wisdom

795 Can readily identify any and all

796 Special case aspects within

797 The generalized whole

798 When listening

799 Sensitively to one’s intuitions

800 By which alone

801 The generalized sub-subconscious integration

802 Of pattern cognition feedbacks

803 Are articulated.

804 Philip Morrison—Cornell’s head

805 Of the department of nuclear physics—

806 Talks about what he calls

807 ‘‘Left-hand’’ and ‘‘right-hand’’ sciences.

808 Right-hand science deals in all the proven

809 Scientific formulas and experiments.

810 Left-hand science deals in

811 All of the as yet unknown or unproven—

812 That is: With all it is going to take

813 Intellectually, intuitively, speculatively, imaginatively

814 And even mystically

815 By inspired persistence

816 To open up the as yet unknown.

817 The great scientists were great

818 Because they were the ones

819 Who dealt successfully with the unknown. All the ‘‘greats’’ were left-hand scientists.

820 Despite this historical patterning of the ‘‘greats’’ We have government underwriting Only the right-hand science, Making it bigger and sharper,

821 Rather than more inclusive and understanding*.— For how could Congress justify Appropriations of billions for dreams?

822 So the billions went only For the swiftly obsoleting

823 Bigger, faster and more incisive

824 Modifications of yesterday’s certainties, By Ph. D. specialists Guaranteed by the great Institutes of Technology To which the Congress Allocated the training funds As obviously ‘‘safe’’ .

825 And exempt from political criticism;

826 Despite that scientific investigation Had shown beyond doubt That almost all of America’s Top performance scientists Had been educated

827 In small, liberal arts colleges, And that almost all Of those top scientists Attributed their success To their good fortune In having studied intimately With a great inspiring teacher. It woud be considered Political madness

828 To risk charges of corruption

829 Through voting government funds

830 To any individual

831

832Especially to ‘‘great inspiring teachers’’—‘‘Crackpot longhairs!’’

833 So it goes—

834 To hell with the facts

835 When re-election

836 To political office is at stake.

837

838Everything that constitutes science Is unteachable.

839 And we recall that

840 Eddington said: ‘‘Science

841 Is the earnest attempt

842 Of individual initiative

843 To set in order

844 The facts of experience.’’

845

846Scientific routines for specialized technicians And scientific formulas for their reference Alone are teachable. Initiative is unteachable.

847Because we have been governmentally fostering Ony right-hand science and Right-hand science to excess

848 The U.S.A. President’s science advisor

849 Instituted last year (1965)

850 A new direction of search

851 For sources of so-called ‘‘creativity.’’

852

853Financed by the National Academy of Sciences, He asked New York University’s art department To bring together a representative group of America’s leading art educators and artists.

854It was felt by the National Academy That the art educators—As those who dealt with

855 Most of the almost drop-outs

856 Who had been switched into art

857 As a ‘‘last resort’’—

858 Were probably intimate

859 With the type of emerging youth

860 Who were allowed to remain

861 In a freer state of mind

862 —In the world of art —

863 Than would they have been

864 If disciplined rigorously

865 In sharp specialization by the sciences.

866 That meeting I thought fascinating

867 For it disclosed the artists as being

868 Individuals who develop powerful self-protection

869 Of their innate intellectual

870 And conceptual capability inheritance.

871 They often protect their innate capabilities

872 Through intuitively triggered poker-faced silence

873 Which in the elementary or high schools

874 Is interpreted as non-cooperative, mental inferiority, Often causing early termination

875 Of their formal education.

876 I think the consensus

877 Of the New York University meeting

878 Was that individuals

879 Of original conceptual brilliance

880 Were most frequently

881 Detected, protected, and made to grow By equally sensitive art teachers.

882 ‘‘Great teachers.’’

883 Which agrees elegantly

884 With the statements

885 Of the proven scientists

886 Regarding their own experiences.

887 Congressional appropriations committees Please take notice!

888 To comprehend the integral of art and science As an irrepressible, intuitive creative urgency—As an artist’s need to articulate—

889 Kepes at Massachusetts Institute of Technology Made a beautiful demonstration.

890 He took hundreds of 8’’ x 10’’

891 Black-and-white photographs

892 Of modern paintings and mixed them thoroughly Like shuffled cards

893 With photographs taken by scientists

894 Through microscopes or telescopes

895 Of all manner of natural phenomena Sound waves, chromosomes and such.

896 The only way you can classify

897 Photographs with nothing recognizable in them

898 Is by your own spontaneous Pattern classifications.

899 Group the mealy, the blotchy, the striped,

900 The swirly, the polka-dotted, and their sub-combinations.

901 The pattern classified groups Of photographs were displayed.

902 The artists’ work and the scientists’

903 Were indistinguishable.

904 Checking the back-mounted data, it was found

905 That the artist had frequently conceived

906 The imagined pattern before

907 The scientist found it in nature.

908 Science began to take A new view of artists.

909 Loving mothers

910 Prohibit here and promote there—

911 Often in ways irrelevant or frustrating To brain-coordinated genetic evolution,

912 Often suppressing

913 A child’s profound contribution Trying to emerge.

914 We have to look on our society

915

916As we look on the biological world in general Recognizing, for instance,

917 The extraordinary contributions

918 Of the fungi, the manures, the worms, et al.— In the chemical reprocessing—And fertility up-grading of the earth.

919 We must learn to think

920 Of the functions of the trees’ roots

921 As being of equal importance To the leaves’ functions.

922 We tend to applaud

923 Only the flower and the fruit

924 Just as we applaud only the football player

925 Who makes the touchdown

926 And not the linemen

927 Who opened the way.

928 What society applauds as ‘‘creative’’

929 Is often isolated

930 Out of an extraordinary set Of co-equal evolutionary events, Most of which are invisible.

931 Evolutionary ‘‘touchdowns’’ are unpredictable—Sometimes centuries apart.

932 Who knows which child

933 is to make the next breakthrough?

934 In the next decade society

935

936Is going to be preoccupied with the child Because through the behavioral sciences And electrical exploration of the brain We find that given the right environment And thoughtful answers to its questions The child has everything it needs educationally Right from birth.

937 We have thought erroneously of education

938 As the mature wisdom

939 And over-brimming knowledge of the grownups

940 Injected by the discipline pump

941 Into the otherwise ‘‘empty’’ child’s head.

942 Sometimes parents say ‘‘don’t’’

943 Because they want to protect the child

944 From getting into trouble.

945 At other times when they fail to say ‘‘no’’

946 The child gets into trouble.

947 The child, frustrated, stops exploring.

948 It is possible to design environments

949 Within which the child will be

950 Neither frustrated nor hurt

951 Yet free to self-educate, spontaneously and fully

952 Without trespassing on others.

953 I have learned to undertake

954 Reform of the environment

955 And not to try to reform man.

956 If we design the environment properly

957 It will permit both child and adult to develop safely And to behave logically.

958 Order is achieved through—positive and negative—

959 Magnitude and frequency controlled alteration

960 Of the successive steering angles.

961 We move by zigzagging control

962 From one phase of physical Universe evolution to another.

963 The rudder concept of social law is most apt.

964 The late Norbert Wiener chose the word cybernetics

965 Derived from Greek roots of ‘‘rudder’’

966 Because Wiener, Shannon and others

967 in communication theory

968 Were exploring human behaviors

969 And their brain-controlled ‘‘feedback,’’ etc.,

970 As a basis for the design of computers—

971 And it became evident

972 That the human brain only waveringly

973 Steers man through constant change.

974 No sharp cleavage is found

975 Which identifies the boundary between life and non-life,

976 Between the heretofore so-called ‘‘animate’’ and ‘‘inanimate.’’

977 Viruses,

978 The smallest organized structures

979 Exhibiting ‘‘life,’’

980 May be classified either

981 As inanimate or animate -

982 As crystalline or ‘‘cellular’’ forms.

983 This is the level also at which

984 The DNA-RNA genetic code serves as

985 An angle and frequency designed

986 Structural pattern integrity.

987 Such pattern integrities

988 Are strictly accountable

989 Only as mathematical principles

990 Pattern integrities are found

991 At all levels of structural organization in Universe.

992 The DNA-RNA is a specialized case

993 Of the generalized principle of pattern integrity

994 Found throughout life and non-life.

995 All pattern integrity design

996 Is controlled entirely and only by

997 Angle and frequency modulation.

998 The biological corpus

999 Is not strictly ‘‘animate’’ at any point.

1000 Given that the ‘‘ordering’’

1001 Of the corpus design

1002 Is accomplished through such codings as DNA-RNA Which are exclusively angle and frequency modulation.

1003 Then we may go on to suggest

1004

1005That ‘‘life,’’ as we customarily define it Could be effected at a distance.

1006Precession is the effect Of one moving system Upon another moving system. Precession always produces

1007Angular changes of the movements Of the effected bodies and

1008At angles other than 180 degrees, That is, the results are never Continuance in a straight line. Ergo all bodies of Universe Are effecting the other bodies

1009 In varying degrees

1010 And all the intergravitational effects

1011 Are precessionally angular modulations And all the interradiation effects Are frequency modulations.

1012 The gravitational and radiation effects Could modulate the DNA-RNA Angle and frequency instructions At astronomical remoteness—Life could be ‘‘sent on.’’

1013 Within the order of evolution as usually drawn Life ‘‘occurred’’ as a series

1014 Of fortuitous probabilities in the primeval sea. It could have been sent or ‘‘radiated’’ there. That is, the prime code

1015 Or angle and frequency modulated signal Could have been transmitted From a remote stellar location.

1016 It seems more likely

1017

1018(In view of the continuous rediscovery of humans As fully organized beings

1019At ever more remote historical periods) That the inanimate structural pattern integrity, Which we call human being, Was a frequency modulated code message Beamed at Earth from remote location.

1020Man as prime organizing ‘‘Principle’’ construct pattern integrity Was radiated here from the stars - Not as primal cell, but as

1021A fully articulated high order being, Possibly as the synergetic totality Of all the gravitation And radiation effects

1022 Of all the stars

1023 In our galaxy

1024 And from all the adjacent galaxies

1025 With some weak effects

1026 And some strong effects

1027 And from all time.

1028

1029And pattern itself being weightless, The life integrities are apparently Inherently immortal.

1030 You and I

1031 Are essential functions

1032 Of Universe

1033 We are exquisite syntropy.

1034 I’ll be seeing you!

1035 Forever.