Buckyverse

Synergetics Dictionary — V

529 cards

V

← Utopia or Oblivion (2) | Vacant - Available →


Letter Group Divider


C19876

Vacant - Available

← V | Vacuum →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19877

Vacuum

← Vacant - Available | Vacuum →


Index Entry

Vacuum:

"The word vacuum relates specifically to gaseous phenomena. Nature's abhorrence of a vacuum induces physical relationships only in respect to the gaseous state. The vector equilibrium is the nothingness phase of all states of the physical Universe: It is the generalization of nothingness, within which generalization the absolute vacuum is a special case event in the gaseous state."

  • Citation & context at Vector Equilibrium as Starting Point, (2)

11 Sep'75


C19878

Vacuum

← Vacuum | Vacuum →


RBF Definitions

"Partial vacuum results as the physical atmospheric gases are removed beyond whose zero evacuations the electromagnetic tensing induces reverse flows of physically demonstrable positive energy. Vacuum = Novent = invisible. At the indispensable center of the sphere Universe turns itself inside-out. The invisible, a priori, multiplicative two-ness, differentially disclosed in the synergetics topological systems' hierarchy is manifest of the integrity of the sizeless, timeless, nonconceptuality always complementing the conceptual system take-out from nonsimultaneous, nonconceptual scenario Universe's eternal self-regenerating."

  • Citation at Topological Hierarchy, 19 Feb'72

  • (Cite RBF's re-write of 19 Feb citation.

Citations

  1. RBF's re-write of 19 Feb citation.

C19879

Vacuum

← Vacuum | Vacuum →


Index Entry

Vacuum:

"Vacuum = novent = invisible. The center of the sphere turns inside out.?

  • Cite RBF to EJA + BO'R, 3200 Idaho, Was DC, 17 Feb'72

C19880

Vacuum

← Vacuum | Vacuum-fulcrumed Cars →


Index Entry

Because I don't talk space, I don't have to have a vacuum. I don't start with space. I start with nothing. Things are always special-case temporary realizations of a specifically detailed dimension and behavior complex of generalized laws applied to a local inventory of physical resources. I start thinking with a No-Size conceptual model of a whole system.

  • Cite RBF to EJA +BU'R, 3200 Idaho, DC, 17 Feb '72 as rewritten 19 Feb '72

C19881

Vacuum-fulcrumed Cars

← Vacuum | Vacuum = Noevent = Invisible →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19882

Vacuum = Noevent = Invisible

← Vacuum-fulcrumed Cars | Vacuum of Universe →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19883

Vacuum of Universe

← Vacuum = Noevent = Invisible | Vacuum Vacuumizing (1) →


Index Entry

Vacuum of Universe:

"The Platonic solids do not stand in a vacuum of Universe. They are in Universe and if you change that thing you change everything else."

  • Citation & context at Platonic Solids, 12 Jul'62

C19884

Vacuum Vacuumizing (1)

← Vacuum of Universe | Vacuum Vacuumizing (2) →


Cross Reference

Vacuum =ent = Invisible, Nov

Cross-References


C19885

Vacuum Vacuumizing (2)

← Vacuum Vacuumizing (1) | Vagina →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19886

Vagina

← Vacuum Vacuumizing (2) | Valence Valent →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19887

Valence Valent

← Vagina | Valid to the King →


Cross Reference

ivalent, Oct

Equivalent

Cross-References


C19888

Valid to the King

← Valence Valent | Valid Validity (1) →


Cross Reference

Valid to the King:

Cross-References


C19889

Valid Validity (1)

← Valid to the King | Valid Validity (2) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19890

Valid Validity (2)

← Valid Validity (1) | Valuable Chemistry →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19891

Valuable Chemistry

← Valid Validity (2) | Valuable Unit →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19892

Valuable Unit

← Valuable Chemistry | Values (1) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References

  • Wright, F.L, 8 Aug'38

C19893

Values (1)

← Valuable Unit | Values (2) →


Cross Reference

Optimism: Reverse Optimism

Profit: Man-invented Game of Quick Profit

Quantum Values

Intervaluations

Cross-References


C19894

Values (2)

← Values (1) | Valvability →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19895

Valvability

← Values (2) | Valve →


Index Entry

Valvability:

"The fact that the rhombic dodecahedron can have its 144 modules oriented as either introvert-exrovert, or as three-way circumferential, provides its valvability between broadcasting-transceiving and noninterference relaying."

  • Citation and context at Rhombic Dodecahedron, 30 Nov'72

C19896

Valve

← Valvability | Valving →


RBF Definitions

"The spheres turn into spaces and the spaces turn into spheres: they operate as valves."

Citations

  1. RBF to LJA, 3200 Idaho, DC, 20 Feb '72

C19897

Valving

← Valve | Valving →


Index Entry

Valving:

"The Kites are always either positively or negatively biased internally in respect to their energy valving (amplifying, choking, cutting off, and holding) proclivities..."


C19898

Valving

← Valving | Valving →


Cross Reference

The frequency and magnitude of event occurrences of any system are comprehensively and discretely controllable by valving, that is, by angle and frequency modulation. Angle and frequency modulation exclusively define all experiences which events altogether constitute Universe.

Cross-References


C19899

Valving

← Valving | Valve of Sensitivity →


Index Entry

Valving:

"Valving embraces the concept of generalized design whose ultimate properties are determined only by frequency and angular modulations."

  • Cite MARKS P. 7. 1960

C19900

Valve of Sensitivity

← Valving | Valving: Valvability (1) →


Cross Reference

Sensitivity of the artist-scientists, Apr'77

Cross-References


C19901

Valving: Valvability (1)

← Valve of Sensitivity | Valving Valvability (2) →


Cross Reference

Cold Valve of Time vs. Hot Valve of Energy

Conscious Part Acts as a Valve

Information Transaction & Valving

Radiant Valvability of IW-defined Wavelength

Instfumentation

Cross-References


C19902

Valving Valvability (2)

← Valving: Valvability (1) | Van Allen Belt →


Cross Reference

Cell: Biological Cell Nucleus, 1954

Sensitivity of the Artists-scientists, Apr'77

Time vs Energy, Dec'40

Cross-References


C19903

Van Allen Belt

← Valving Valvability (2) | Van Allen Belt →


Index Entry

Van Allen Belt:

"If our space vehicle Earth

Were nearer to the Sun,

We would be incinerated

By our energy-supplying mothership.

To compound the advantage of vast distance

As protection against Sun's incinerating us

We have the Van Allen belts; of which we learned

Only in the last few years.

These belts are the outermost

Of the biosphere's spherical mantles.

Within these Van Allens we have

The ionic veil surrounding our spaceship.

The Van Allen belts intercept the radiation

Which would kill a naked man positioned outward of those belts.

The Van Allen belts

Diffuse the radiation, by refraction, to below lethal level."

  • Cite BRAIN & MIND, pp. 108-109 May '72

C19904

Van Allen Belt

← Van Allen Belt | Vancouver →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19905

Vancouver

← Van Allen Belt | Vanish Vanishment (1) →


Cross Reference

Vancouver:

Cross-References

  • Habitat'76 UK World Conference

C19906

Vanish Vanishment (1)

← Vancouver | Vanish Vanishment (2) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19907

Vanish Vanishment (2)

← Vanish Vanishment (1) | Vanity (1) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19908

Vanity (1)

← Vanish Vanishment (2) | Vanity (2) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19909

Vanity (2)

← Vanity (1) | van't Hoff →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19910

van't Hoff

← Vanity (2) | van't Hoff →


Index Entry

van't Hoff:

"Late in the nineteenth century the organic chemists led by van't Hoff discovered that all organic chemistry is tetrahedrally configured. In all the structuring we know of in organic chemistry-- plastics or gasolines or what-have-you-- the atoms form molecules by little tetrahedral arrangements: tetrahedra point-to-point (univalent), tetrahedra edge-to-edge (bivalent), tetrahedra face-to-face ((trivalent), or congruent tetrahedra (quadrivalent). These are the primary bondings. The range goes from C (carbon), which is relatively light, to C₄ (carbonaceous diamond), which is quadrivalent: four points of the tetrahedra are congruent with one another."

-- Cite Conceptuality of Fundamental Structures (Kepes), p.72, 1965


C19911

van't Hoff

← van't Hoff | van't Hoff →


Index Entry

van't Hoff: Jacobus Henricus van't Hoff: (1852-1911)

"van't Hoff said he though this oneness, twoness, threeness and fourness has something to do with tetrahedra. . . . He went to work very hard and he lived to make optical proof with the microscope of the tetrahedronal configuration of carbon. He was the first man ever to receive the Nobel Prize. One reason the chemists hadn't accredited him was that most chemists were metallurgists. Organic chemistry was a very new phase of chemistry and they hadn't found any bonding in the metallurgy, so the chemists were simply bored with this phase of chemistry and when this man comes along with some kind of crystallographic configuration of conceptuality it annoyed them very much. They had been getting along very nicely with just numbers. They had the kind of relationships where they did not have to have the tetrahedron shape. Then there is a great hiatus after van't Hoff and it goes up to 1932, and that is a half-century hiatus."

  • Cite Oregon Lecture #2, p. '74. 2 Jul'62

C19912

van't Hoff

← van't Hoff | van't Hoff: Combining van't Hoff & Pauling →


Index Entry

van't Hoff:

"... van't Hoff showed that all organic chemical structuring is tetrahedrally configured in vertexial linkage ..."


C19913

van't Hoff: Combining van't Hoff & Pauling

← van't Hoff | van't Hoff →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19914

van't Hoff

← van't Hoff: Combining van't Hoff & Pauling | van't Hoff →


Cross Reference

Omnidirectional Halo, pp. 151, 161

Oregon Lecture #8

Cross-References

  • NASA Speech

C19915

van't Hoff

← van't Hoff | Vapor (1) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19916

Vapor (1)

← van't Hoff | Vapor Vaporization (2) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References

  • Liquid-crystal-vapor-incandescent phases

C19917

Vapor Vaporization (2)

← Vapor (1) | Variables: Theory Of →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19918

Variables: Theory Of

← Vapor Vaporization (2) | Variables →


RBF Definitions

"In the general theory of variables, it has been recognized that the set of all the variables may be divided into two classes: (1) the class of all the inclusive variables within a given system, the interior relevants, and (2) the class of all those operative exclusive of the system, the exterior relevants. It has been further recognized that the variables outside the system may affect the system from outside. In varying degrees, specific levels of subclasses of these 'background' or outside variables are identified as parameters. But the 'background' concept is fallaciously inadequate; dealing with insideness and outsideness for 'background' is limited to the two-dimensional or flat projection concept, which inherently lacks insideness--ergo, cannot also have outsideness, which always and only coexists with insideness. Ergo, all two-dimensional copings with systems are inherently inadequate and prophetically vitiated."

Citations

  1. SYNERGETICS text at Sec. \href{https://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/500-conceptuality#section-535.05}{535.05}; RBF rewrite of "Omnidirectional Halo, pp.152-153, Nov'71

C19919

Variables

← Variables: Theory Of | Variable Strands Braiding →


Index Entry

General Theory of Variables:

"In the general theory of variables it has been recognized that the set of all the variables may be divided into two classes-- (1) the class of all the inclusive variables within a given system, and (2) the class of all those operative exclusive of the system. It has been further recognized that the variables may outside the system may affect the system from outside. In varying degrees specific levels of sub-classes of these 'background' or outside variables are identified as parameters. This background 'inside and outside' concept is a two-dimensional or flat-projection concept."

  • Cite OMNIDIRECTIONAL HALO, pp. 152, 153, 1960

C19920

Variable Strands Braiding

← Variables | Variables: Theory Of →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19921

Variables: Theory Of

← Variable Strands Braiding | Variable Variables (1) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19922

Variable Variables (1)

← Variables: Theory Of | Variable Variables (2) →


Cross Reference

Electable Omniumuniform Frequency Occurrences

Intervariable

Cross-References


C19923

Variable Variables (2)

← Variable Variables (1) | Variant Variation →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19924

Variant Variation

← Variable Variables (2) | Vari-intertransformabilities →


Cross Reference

Constant

Variable

ave Wave Limit of Variation, Oct

Cross-References


C19925

Vari-intertransformabilities

← Variant Variation | Varsity Team of Universe (2) →


Cross Reference

Vari-intertransformabilities:

Cross-References


C19926

Varsity Team of Universe (2)

← Vari-intertransformabilities | Varsity →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19927

Varsity

← Varsity Team of Universe (2) | Vase (1) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19928

Vase (1)

← Varsity | Vase (2) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19929

Vase (2)

← Vase (1) | Vector →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19930

Vector

← Vase (2) | Vectors →


Index Entry

Vector:

"Vectors . . . exist only as energetic phenomena. A vector always represents a product of mass and the velocity of a given energy entity operating in a given angular direction in respect to a given axis of observational reference."

  • Citation & context at Synergetics, 17 Oct'77

C19931

Vectors

← Vector | Vector →


Index Entry

Vectors:

"Do not refer to vectors as restraints. Vectors are capabilities, not restraints."

  • Cite RBF to question by Dr. Michael Bruwer at World Game Workshop'77; Phila., PA: 22 Jun'77

C19932

Vector

← Vectors | Vector →


Index Entry

Vector:

"So-called edges and vectors are inherently only convergent or divergent interrelationships between multiply-identifiable, point-to-able, vertex fixes."

  • Cite SYNERGETICS text at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/900-modelability#section-905.24905.24, 16 Dec'73

C19933

Vector

← Vector | Vector →


Index Entry

Vector:

"Every vector has two ends which it joins as unity."

  • Cite Marginalis by RBF on first SYNERGETICS galley #71 (\hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/400-system#section-421.00421.0: (not included in text for technical reasons only), 10 Nov'73

C19934

Vector

← Vector | Vector →


Index Entry

Vector:

"The vector is inherent in the synergetics system since it is structured with the vector as unity. Because vectors = mass x velocity, all the factors of time, distance, and energy, as both mass and effort as well as angular direction, are inherent; and E as energy quantum of one photon = 20 P²."

  • Cite SYNERGETICS draft at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/200-synergetics#section-223.75223.75, 26 Sep'73

C19935

Vector

← Vector | Vector →


Index Entry

Vector:

"First powering expresses only one vector, i.e., one-twelfth of relevant system potential."

  • Citation and context at Powering: One Dimension, 15 Oct'72

C19936

Vector

← Vector | Vector →


Index Entry

Vector:

"The local energy content of a vector is its mass times its velocity."

  • Cite RBF to EJA, Beverly Hotel, NY, 22 Jun'72

C19937

Vector

← Vector | Vector →


RBF Definitions

"... Vectors, being the product of physical energy constituents, are 'real,' having velocity multiplied by mass operating in a specific direction; velocity being a product of time and size modules; and mass being a volume-weight relationship. On impact, mass at velocity transforms into heat and work. These energy factors can be translated not only into work, but into heat, or into time as well."

  • Citation at Time, 27 May'72

Citations

  1. SYNERGETICS draft, Sec. \href{https://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/400-system#section-410.05}{410.05}, RBF rewrite of 27/5-May'72

C19938

Vector

← Vector | Vector →


Index Entry

Vector:

"A vector manifests a unique energy event-- either potential or realized-- expressed discretely in terms of direction, mass, velocity, and distance. A vector is a partial generalization being either metaphysically theoretical or physically realized, and in either sense an abstraction of a special case, as are numbers both abstract (empty sets) or special case (filled sets)."


C19939

Vector

← Vector | Vector →


Index Entry

Vector:

"All the interrelationships of system foci are conceptually representable by vectors. A system is a closed configuration of vectors. It is a pattern of forces constituting a geometrical integrity which returns upon itself in a plurality of directions."

  • Citation and context AT Polyhedral Systems, 25/2 May'72

C19940

Vector

← Vector | Vector →


Index Entry

Vector:

"Time is in our dimensioning because our geometry is vectorial. Every vector = mass x velocity, and time is a function of velocity."

  • Citation & context at Time, 21 Dec'71

  • Citation from EJA, 3200 Idaho, Washington DC, 21 Dec'71.


C19941

Vector

← Vector | Vector →


Index Entry

Vector:

"Vectors are not abstractions: they are resolutions."

(Synergetics: \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/900-modelability#section-962.40962.40)

(New context at Time-size, 30 Oct'72

  • Cite RBF to EJA, 3200 Idaho, Washington DC, 21 Dec. '71.

C19942

Vector

← Vector | Vector →


Index Entry

Vector:

"The size of a vector is its overall wavilinear length."

  • Cite SYNERGETICS Corollaries, \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/200-synergetics#section-240.00240. by RBF 11 Oct. '71, Haverford, Penna.

C19943

Vector

← Vector | Vector →


Index Entry

Vectors are size.

No vectors = No size.

No size = No vectors.


C19944

Vector

← Vector | Vector →


Index Entry

Vector:

"Every event is six-vectored."

  • Cite SYNERGETICS Corollaries, \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/200-synergetics#section-240.00240, by RBF 11 Oct.'71, Haverford, Penna.

VECTORS- SEC. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/500-conceptuality#section-521.07521.07


C19945

Vector

← Vector | Vector →


Index Entry

Vector:

"There are six vectors or none."

  • Cite SYNERGETICS Corollaries, \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/200-synergetics#section-240.00240, by RBF 11 Oct. '71, Haverford, Penna.

C19946

Vector

← Vector | Vectors →


Index Entry

Vector:

"You have six vectors or none for every energy event."

(EJA comment: A query to RBF in May'72 confirms that the intent of the above is that there cannot be less than six vectors. It does not mean that there can be an event with no vectors.)

  • Cite RBF to Eja, Washington, DC, 7 Oct. '71.

C19947

Vectors

← Vector | Vectors →


Index Entry

Vectors:

"Sum totally the four hexagons [of the vector equilibrium] have 24 radial disintegrative vectors and 24 chordally integrative vectors. The unique planes of any two hexagons of the set of four interact with one another in such a manner that the line of interaction (intersection) of the planes is congruent with the radially defined diameters of the two hexagons. This paired congruency of the 24 radial disintegrative vectors of the four hexagons reduces their visible number to 12. While the 24 chordal integrative vectors remain non-congruent and appear as 24. The congruence of vectors occurs many times in nature's coordinate structuring and de-structuring and often misleads the uninformed observer."

  • Cite RBF Marginalis, Bear Island, 25 Aug. '71, Synergetics, Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/800-operational-mathematics#section-851.72851.72 \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/1000-omnitopology#section-1011.401011.40

C19948

Vectors

← Vectors | Vector →


Index Entry

Vectors:

"Now we have what we call vectors. Vectors represent energy experiences. A vector is a line going in a specific direction in relation to to two points giving you an axis, say your head and your feet. That gives you an axis of reference and then you have a vector, an energy action moving at some angle in relation to that axis of yours. And the length of the line is arrived at by multiplying the mass times the velocity. Those then are energy vectors. And energy vectors are extremely useful because they do represent actual experience in relation to yourself as observer. It acts as a reference."

  • Cite RBF at SINS Seminar, U. Mass., Amherst, 22 July '71, p. 19

C19949

Vector

← Vectors | Vector →


Index Entry

Vector:

"Since neither light nor any other experiential phenomena are instantaneous, than an action and the vector by which it is manifest is linear. If it were instantaneous it would be less than a point."

  • Cite RBF SYNERGETICS Draft Mar '71

C19950

Vector

← Vector | Vectors →


Index Entry

Vector:

"A vector manifests a unique energy event

expressed discretely in term of direction, mass

velocity and distance."

  • Cite RBF in SYNERGETICS Draft

March 1971


C19951

Vectors

← Vector | Vectors →


Index Entry

Vectors:

"Vectors always and only coexist with two other vectors, whether or not expressed, i.e., every event has its nonsimultaneous action, reaction and resultant."

  • Cite RBF Marginalis on SYNERGETICS Draft, \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/600-structure#section-604.00604, March 1971.

C19952

Vectors

← Vectors | Vector →


Index Entry

Vectors:

"Vectors are curvilinear lines of very high frequency regeneration of energy events whose high frequency short wavelengths only superficially appear to be straight."

  • Cite RBF to Hans Meyer in H.M. Memo 6f 23 January 1971 as re-written by RBF on insert at \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/600-structure#section-601.00601 of SYNERGETICS Draft, March 1971.

C19953

Vector

← Vectors | Vector →


Index Entry

Vector:

"A vector is a very high frequency line of energy

which looks superficially 'straight.'"

(Adapted.)

  • Cite RBF to Hans Meyer in H.M. memo

of 23 January 1971.


C19954

Vector

← Vector | Vector →


Index Entry

Vectors are spearlike lines representing the integrated velocities, directions, and masses of the total aggregate of nonredundant forces operating complexedly with a given energy event as the latter transpires within a generalized environment of other experiences whose angular orientations and interdistance relationships are known.

Every physical event in nonsimultaneous scenario Universe is characterized by three, multidimensionally interlinked vectors which interact at angles other than 180° to one another as in the multidimensionally, helically zigzagging pattern of lightning.


C19955

Vector

← Vector | Vector →


Index Entry

Vectors as lines don't go to infinity; they are absolutely discrete. It always has angular direction in respect to other experiences. Now that is a vector.


C19956

Vector

← Vector | Vector →


Index Entry

Vector:

"A vector is a line as a discrete unit of energy expressed in terms of mass, velocity and distance."

  • Cite DEFINITIONS FOR SYNERGETICS BY PETER PEARCE, May'67

C19957

Vector

← Vector | Vectors →


Index Entry

Since "neither light nor any other phenomenon is instantaneous, then an action and the vector it creates is not instantaneous. Therefore the terminal end of an action's vector occurs later. (Adapted.)


C19958

Vectors

← Vector | Vector →


Index Entry

Vectors:

"What do we mean by lines? We can say that because lines are directional energy events, they are vectors. A vector always has direction, relative to other events, and its length, or energy magnitude, always represents the product of its velocity multiplied by its mass. The direction is an angular one in respect to an omnidirectional coordinate system having a specific central point and a specific set of external points at specific angles and distances from one another and from the central point."

.- Cite CARBONFILE-ART-H.25


C19959

Vector

← Vectors | Vector →


Index Entry

Vector:

"Because lines are directional energy events they are vectors. A vector always has direction, relative to other events and its length or energy magnitude always represents the product of its velocity multiplied by its mass. The direction is an angular one in respect to an omni-directional coordinate system having a specific central point and a specific set of external points at specific angles and distances from one another and from the central point."

LAST SENTENCE = AXIS OF REFERENCE- SEC. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/500-conceptuality#section-514.02514.02

FIRST HALF = VECTORS - SEC \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/500-conceptuality#section-521.02521.02


C19960

Vector

← Vector | Vector →


Index Entry

Vectors have unique direction in relation to other experiences; they have mass times velocity and they are discrete in length.

  • Cite LEDGEMONT, pn 6-7, 15 Oct '64

C19961

Vector

← Vector | Vector →


Index Entry

Vector:

"For every point (q.v.) in universe there are six uniquely and exclusively operative vectors.

"Each vector is reversible having its negative alternate.

"Every point may export all or any of its six positive or six negative vectors by importing like numbers.

"Each point in universe could be said to have twelve unique and exclusive vectors, but one set of six is operative and its alternate reverse effect set is only potential."

Cite COLLIER'S, P. 113, Oct '59


C19962

Vector

← Vector | Vector →


Index Entry

Vector:

"Vectors describe energy conditions."

  • For citation and context see Isotropic Vector Matrix, Jun '66

C19963

Vector

← Vector | Vectorial Advantage →


Index Entry

Vectors are real experiences and they have inherent velocity and mass.


C19964

Vectorial Advantage

← Vector | Vectors - Capabilities →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19965

Vectors - Capabilities

← Vectorial Advantage | Vector Center Fix →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19966

Vector Center Fix

← Vectors - Capabilities | Vector Constant →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19967

Vector Constant

← Vector Center Fix | Vectorial Convergence (1) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19968

Vectorial Convergence (1)

← Vector Constant | Vectorial Convergence (2) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19969

Vectorial Convergence (2)

← Vectorial Convergence (1) | Vectorial Expression of Mass & Frequency →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19970

Vectorial Expression of Mass & Frequency

← Vectorial Convergence (2) | Vectorial Geometry Field →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19971

Vectorial Geometry Field

← Vectorial Expression of Mass & Frequency | Vectorial Geometry Field (1) →


Index Entry

Vectorial Geometry Field:

"We, however-- inspired by Avogadro's identical energy conditions under which different elements disclosed the same number of molecules per given volume-- are exploring the possible establishment of an operationally strict vectorial geometry field, which is an isotropic (everywhere the same) vector matrix. We abandon the Greek perpendicularity of construction and find ourselves operationally in an omnidirectional, spherically observed, multidimensional, omni-intertransforming Universe. Our first move in spherical reality scribing is to strike a quasi-sphere as the vectorial radius of construction. Our dividers are welded at a fixed angle. The second move is to establish the center. Third move: a surface circle. The radius is uniform and the lesser circle is uniform."

  • Cite RBF insert to SYNERGETICS galley at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/800-operational-mathematics#section-825.28825.28, 22 Nov'73

C19972

Vectorial Geometry Field (1)

← Vectorial Geometry Field | Vectorial Geometry Field (2) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19973

Vectorial Geometry Field (2)

← Vectorial Geometry Field (1) | Vectorial Geometry →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19974

Vectorial Geometry

← Vectorial Geometry Field (2) | Vector: Half Vectors →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19975

Vector: Half Vectors

← Vectorial Geometry | Vector: Half Vectors →


Index Entry

Each vector is composed of two halves, each half belonging respectively to the unique radius of one of the tangent spheres that is perpendicular to the point of tangency. The half-vector radii of the isotropic vector matrix are always perpendicular to the points of tangency; therefore they operate as one continuous vector.

  • Citation at Isotropic Vector Matrix, 28 Oct'73

C19976

Vector: Half Vectors

← Vector: Half Vectors | Vector Half Vectors (1) →


Index Entry

In the isotropic vector matrix derived from the closest packing of spheres, every vector leads from one nuclear center to another, and therefore represents the operational effect of a merging of two force centers upon each other. Each vector is composed of two halves, each half belonging respectively to any two adjacent nuclear centers. Each half of the line represents those unique radii of each of the tangent spheres which alone are perpendicular to the identical points of tangency and therefore they operate as one continuous vector.

"Unity as represented by the internuclear vector modulus is of necessity always of the value of two, that is, unity is inherently two for it represents union of a minimum of two energy centers."


C19977

Vector Half Vectors (1)

← Vector: Half Vectors | Vector: Half Vectors (2) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19978

Vector: Half Vectors (2)

← Vector Half Vectors (1) | Vectorial Model of Interference →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19979

Vectorial Model of Interference

← Vector: Half Vectors (2) | Vector Modelability →


Index Entry

Vectorial Model of Interference:

"When there is an interference of two energy events of similar magnitude, there is a coequal pattern of interference resultants, as when two knitting needles slide tangentially by one another. But when one converging body of an interfering pair is much larger than the other, the little one 'seems' to do all the resultant moving as viewed by an observer small enough to see the small converger's motion--as, for instance, human beings see a tennis ball hit the big ball Earth and see only the tennis ball bounce away, the Earth ball being too big to be seen as a ball by the viewer and the relative bounce-off deflection of Earth's orbit from the tennis ball point of impact being too small for detection. As the magnitudes of energy vectors are products of the mass multiplied by the velocity, the velocity may be high and the mass small, or vice versa, and the vectors remain the same length or magnitude. A little body moving at sufficient velocity could have the same effect upon another body with which it interferes as could a big body moving at a slower rate. With these vectorial variables in mind, we see that there are three fundamental preconditions of the interference vectors: where one is larger than the other; one is the same; or one is smaller in energy magnitude than the other."


C19980

Vector Modelability

← Vectorial Model of Interference | Vectorial Model for Magic Numbers →


Cross Reference

Quantum Mechanics: Minimum Geometrical Fourbess,

(4)

Cross-References


C19981

Vectorial Model for Magic Numbers

← Vector Modelability | Vectorial Near-miss →


Cross Reference

Vectorial Model for Magic Numbers:

Cross-References


C19982

Vectorial Near-miss

← Vectorial Model for Magic Numbers | Vectorial Orientation →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19983

Vectorial Orientation

← Vectorial Near-miss | Vectorial Orientation (1) →


Index Entry

Vectorial Orientation:

"The angles of orientation and the dimensional fixes of vectorial energy-event manifestations are always conceptually oriented and positioned in respect to the optionally selected axis of conceptual observation."

  • Cite SYNERGETICS text at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/500-conceptuality#section-513.01513.01, Mar'71

C19984

Vectorial Orientation (1)

← Vectorial Orientation | Vectorial Orientation (2) →


Cross Reference

Orientation

Cross-References


C19985

Vectorial Orientation (2)

← Vectorial Orientation (1) | Vector as 1/12th of Relevant System Potential →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19986

Vector as 1/12th of Relevant System Potential

← Vectorial Orientation (2) | Vector as 1/12th of Relevant System Potential (1) →


Cross Reference

Vector as 1/12th of Relevant System Potential: "First powering expresses only one vector, 1.e., 1/12th of relevant system potential."

Cross-References


C19987

Vector as 1/12th of Relevant System Potential (1)

← Vector as 1/12th of Relevant System Potential | Vector as 1/12th of Relevant System Potential (2) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19988

Vector as 1/12th of Relevant System Potential (2)

← Vector as 1/12th of Relevant System Potential (1) | Vectors Are Real →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19989

Vectors Are Real

← Vector as 1/12th of Relevant System Potential (2) | Vectors Are Real →


Index Entry

Vectors Are Real:

"...God is 99.9999 percent of Universe and the six total vectors come back upon themselves, for the vectors are real."

  • Citation & context at Heaven, 23 May'72

C19990

Vectors Are Real

← Vectors Are Real | Vectors f Restraints →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19991

Vectors f Restraints

← Vectors Are Real | Vector →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19992

Vector

← Vectors f Restraints | Vectorial Symmetry →


Cross Reference

One-second Vector Length:

Cross-References


C19993

Vectorial Symmetry

← Vector | Vectorial System Modular Frequency →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19994

Vectorial System Modular Frequency

← Vectorial Symmetry | Vector-tensor Mensurability (2) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19995

Vector-tensor Mensurability (2)

← Vectorial System Modular Frequency | Vectors & Tensors →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C19996

Vectors & Tensors

← Vector-tensor Mensurability (2) | Vectors & Tensors →


Index Entry

Vectors & Tensors:

"Vectors and tensors constitute all elementary definition."

  • Cite RBF rewrite of SYNERGETICS text at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/200-synergetics#section-200.05200.05; galley marginalis, 11 Oct'73

C19997

Vectors & Tensors

← Vectors & Tensors | Vectors & Tensors →


Index Entry

We can make Platonic figures in nonsolid tensegrity where none of the lines go through any of the same points at the same time, and we realize that the only seemingly continuous, only mass-interattractively cohered, atomic "Milky Way' tensor strands spanning the gaps between the only seemingly 'solid,' omni-islanded, vectorially compressed struts, do altogether permit a systematic, visually informed, and realistically comprehended differentiation between the flexible tensor and inflexible vector energy event behaviors, all of which are consistent with all the experimental information accruing to the most rigorous scientific discipline,


C19998

Vectors & Tensors

← Vectors & Tensors | Vectors & Tensors →


Index Entry

Vectors & Tensors:

"In tensors and vectors of equal magnitude the spiralinearity of the vector is shorter in overall spatial extent than is the spiralinearity of the tensor."

  • Citation & context at Spiralinearity, 25 Mar'71

  • Cite RBF to EJA, Blackstone Hotel, Chicago, 25 March 1971.


C19999

Vectors & Tensors

← Vectors & Tensors | Vectors & Tensors →


Index Entry

Vectors & Tensors:

"A vector represents an expelling force and a tensor an impelling force."

  • Cite RBF to EJA, Blackstone Hotel, Chicago, 25 Mar'71

TENSORS - SEC.\hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/500-conceptuality#section-521.101521.101


C20000

Vectors & Tensors

← Vectors & Tensors | Vectors & Tensors Vector-tensor →


Index Entry

"... Dimension must be physical [and] ... dimension must be energetic. Vectors and tensors constitute all elementary dimension."


C20001

Vectors & Tensors Vector-tensor

← Vectors & Tensors | Vector: Threeness of the Vector (1) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20002

Vector: Threeness of the Vector (1)

← Vectors & Tensors Vector-tensor | Vector: Threeness of the Vector (2) →


RBF Definitions

"There is a constant relative abundance for every vertex in the Universe. There will always be two faces and there will always be three edges. Which is to say then, that for every event in the Universe the number of lines (which are the vectors, the energy actions) will always be three-- or multiples of three.

"Now this is consistent with what we used to have in engineering where we learned that 'every action has a reaction.' But since the discovery of the speed of light . . . we realize that every action has a reaction and a resultant. The resultant and the reaction are not the same. This, then, gives you something very interesting. Every energy action, every energy event is three-part: action and reaction and resultant. They are the vectors. Now we find that the reaction and the resultant are never a 180° continuance of the vectors. There is always something that transpires that makes it precess. So an energy action is some kind of a 'Z'-- an open 'Z' if you think of a 'Z' as three connecting lines. Now the ends of the same three could come around and make it look like a triangle. So it might be a 'Z' or a triangle. There are always three parts, but never at 180° so it's not a straight line"

Citations

  1. RBF to Verner Smythe, NYC, Reel 2, p.6, 11 Mar'69

C20003

Vector: Threeness of the Vector (2)

← Vector: Threeness of the Vector (1) | Vectors: Three-vector Teams (1) →


Index Entry

Vector: Threeness of the Vector:

'It has been found that the proton and the neutron consist of three basic energy components. The proton has its electron and its antineutrino. That takes three vectors. The neutron has its positron and its neutrino. Each one is threefold. Now I take these two and I put them together. Each one of those is called in physics-- either could be called 'One-half quantum,' 'one-half Plank's constant,' or one-half spin.'

'I find when I join the two of them together they give me something that is very stable: it makes one tetrahedron. There are the six edges of the tetrahedron. . . . A tetrahedron is one unit of quantum. This threeness of the vectors is always in here so this gets to be the basic model. The only difference here is that the prime numbers 1, 2, 3, and 5-- they take care of the hierarchy of all the polyhedral geometries, of all the structures of all the atoms.'

  • Cite RBF to Verner Smythe, NYC, Reel 2, pp.6-7, 11 Mar'69

C20004

Vectors: Three-vector Teams (1)

← Vector: Threeness of the Vector (2) | Vectors: Three-vector Teams (2) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20005

Vectors: Three-vector Teams (2)

← Vectors: Three-vector Teams (1) | Vectorial Topology →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20006

Vectorial Topology

← Vectors: Three-vector Teams (2) | Vectorial & Vertexial Geometry (1) →


Index Entry

Vectorial Topology:

"In the coordinate vectorial topology of synergetics, exponential powers and physical model dimensioning are identified with the number of vectors which may intercept the system at a constant angle, while avoiding parallelism or congruence with any other of the uniquely converging vectors of the system."

  • Cite SYNERGETICS draft at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/900-modelability#section-962.07962.07, 17 Nov'72

C20007

Vectorial & Vertexial Geometry (1)

← Vectorial Topology | Vectorial & Vertexial Geometry (2) →


Index Entry

Vectorial & Vertexial Geometry:

"That's how I arrived at the icosahedral version of my Dymaxion airocean world map. Its edge is an arc of 60° 23' with symmetrical subsidence locally. All the changes are internal rather than outwardly. If you dismiss error outwardly in a circle-- or circumferentially-- you end up with three times as much error as if you dismiss them inwardly. The only way to improve on the isosceles version would be to have the 120 triangles of spherical unity, but that would mean breaking up the continents which I didn't want to do. It took me two years to find the airocean array.

"Any incremental module rule could be made into the spherical uniform boundary scale. You just never break open the system.

"Measurement = frequency.

"That's what I thought Avogadro was looking for: a geometry of vectors bringing in time through the velocity of the vector... the frequency of their discrete dimension!

"Avogadro accounts volume with number in a much better way than just putting water in a cube.

  • Cite RBF videotaping session, Philadelphia, Pa., 27 Jan'75

C20008

Vectorial & Vertexial Geometry (2)

← Vectorial & Vertexial Geometry (1) | Vectorial & Vertexial Geometry (3) →


Index Entry

All three-phase vectors come together to make sum-total structures.

You look at any scratched surface and you will always see circles. Where there is light present there are lines that get lit up since they are precessional to the direction of the light. This gives you the sunburst effect in a hubcap or fender.

Vertexial accounting = spherical accounting

The rhombic dodecahedron, like the cube, fills allspace. It has a volume of six. It is the epitome of the behavior of closest packing. The rhombic dodecahedron is the domain of a sphere - spheric.

The 25 great-circle planes/the eighth-octahedra vector equilibrium corners into the A and B Modules. The fractions come out rationally.

The triangle is invariable: connecting the bisectors produces similar triangles. This is not true of quadrangular


C20009

Vectorial & Vertexial Geometry (3)

← Vectorial & Vertexial Geometry (2) | Vectorial & Vertexial Geometry →


Index Entry

Vectorial & Vertexial Geometry:

"bisection.

"Force diagram = music stand form.

"So you have 70° 32' and 109° 28'. The coupler fills allspace with a unity of 24 = 1/24th tetra. Two spheres kiss in the coupler. It provides 92 basic rearrangements of the A and B modules to accommodate the 92 chemical elements.

"All number relationships are covered by the octant, inside-outing, plus-minusing, and so forth. What are all the variables of the system? That is the question to ask. All of the variables of the system are in the coupler.

Plato tried to accommodate the number seven. He knew that 7 x 35 = 2520, a very interesting number.

  • Cite RBF at Penn Bell videotaping session, Philadelphia, 27 Jan'75

C20010

Vectorial & Vertexial Geometry

← Vectorial & Vertexial Geometry (3) | Vectorial & Vertexial Geometry →


Index Entry

RBF then drew on the blackboard:

60°

-54°44'

5°16' (yes)

5°16' (yes)

60°

+10°32'

5°16'

10°32'

70°32'

YES-YES-NO:

  • Cite RBF at Penn Bell videotaping session, Philadelphia, 27 Jan'75

C20011

Vectorial & Vertexial Geometry

← Vectorial & Vertexial Geometry | Vector (1) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20012

Vector (1)

← Vectorial & Vertexial Geometry | Vector (1B) →


Cross Reference

Doubling-up of Vectors

Cross-References


C20013

Vector (1B)

← Vector (1) | Vector (2) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20014

Vector (2)

← Vector (1B) | Vector (3) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20015

Vector (3)

← Vector (2) | Vector (3B) →


Cross Reference

Vector Constant: Dymaxion Vector Constant

Vectorial Expression as Mass & Frequency

Vector Field

Vector: Half-vectors

Cross-References


C20016

Vector (3B)

← Vector (3) | VECTOR EQUILIBRIUM →


Cross Reference

Vector: Threeness of the Vector

Vector: Three-vector Teams

Vectorial Topology

Vectorial & Vertexial Geometry

Vector as 1/12th of Relevant System Potential

Vector: One-second Vector Length

Vectorial Model of Interference

Vectors = Capabilities

Vectors ≠ Restraints

Cross-References


C20017

VECTOR EQUILIBRIUM

← Vector (3B) | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"The vector equilibrium is the zero starting point for happenings or nonhappenings: it is the empty theater and empty circus and empty Universe ready to accommodate any act and any audience."

  • Cite SYNERGETICS, (2nd. Ed.) at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/500-conceptuality#section-503.03503.03; 11 Dec'75

C20018

Vector Equilibrium

← VECTOR EQUILIBRIUM | Vector Equilibrium →


RBF Definitions

"Science is} arriving at a new phase of comprehension in

We are } which we will be discovering that all physical cases experi-

mentally discovered are only special cases of the generalized

principles of nuclear systems: i.e., the vector equilibrium."

(Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/500-conceptuality#section-531.06531.06; 2nd.Ed.)

Citations

  1. RBF marginalia at "Quarks With Color and Flavor" in Scientific American, Oct'75

C20019

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


RBF Definitions

"What you speak of as the cubo-octahedran, I speak of as the vector equilibrium, its radial and chordal vectors being of equal magnitude and abundance.... The vector equilibrium has the virtues of having a boundary scale of 60 degrees for each of the pieces, and its spherical excess is slightly less than that of the icosahedron; ergo the distortion is mildly less than that of the icosahedron..."

  • Citation & context at Dymaxion Airocean World Map, (2), 26 Aug'75

C20020

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"To understand the linear expansion rate think of making soap bubbles where deeply layered molecules get stretched into a single layer as the single atoms guarantee the interattractiveness integrity of the area-stretching thin-out of the atoms.

"We now come to the balancing of the vectors of the vector equilibrium and the arrangement of the 24 external vectors-- end-to-end, closing back upon themselves-- in four great-circle planes, constituting an 'additional' vector force magnitude of 24 embracing the outwardly and separately exploding 24 internal vectors which now operate in increasing independence of one another-- each produces a force of only one.

"We have the surface net drawing on a force resource of 24-- multiplied by radius frequency to the second power-- while the originally-24-force, radially explosive events separate out from one another to produce only separate first-power effectiveness. Hence the gravitational force's geometrical progression rate of gain; i.e. its second-power surface embracing finiteness closure is always at a high energy effectiveness advantage over the disintegrative linear first-power, or only arithmetical progression rate of gain in force."

  • Cite SYNERGETICS, 2nd. Ed. at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/1000-omnitopology#section-1052.671052.67, 3 Jan'75

C20021

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


RBF Definitions

"The behavioral interpatterning frame of reference of the six degrees of freedom in respect to omnidirectionality is, of course, the vector equilibrium, which embraces the three-dimensionality of the cube and the six-dimensionality of the vector equilibrium....

"The 24-positive- and 24-negative-vectored vector equilibrium demonstrates an initially-frequenced, tetrahedrally quantized unity of 20; ergo the Universe, as an aggregate of all humanity's apprehended and comprehended experiences, is at minimum a plurality of 24 vectors."

  • Citation & context at Twelve Universal Degrees of Freedom, 19 Nov'74

C20022

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

The vector equilibrium is the central symmetry through which both balanced and unbalanced asymmetries pulsatingly and complexedly intercompensate and synchronize.

The vector equilibrium's frequency modulatability accommodates the numerically differentiated twonesses.


C20023

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Whenever we refer to an entity it has to be structurally valid and therefore it has to be triangulated. Being locally mixed, vectorially symmetrical but facially asymmetrical; being triangulated but not omnitriangulated, vector equilibrium may function as a system but not as a structure

  • Cite RBF composite; incorporated in SYNERGETICS 2 at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/200-synergetics#section-223.34223.34; 8 Sep'77

C20024

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Whenever we refer to an entity it has to be structurally valid and therefore it has to be triangulated.

Being locally mixed, symmetrical and asymmetrical, being triangulated but not omnitriangulated, (vector equilibrium) may function as a system but not as a structure.

  • Cite EJA composite prior to 7 Sep'77

C20025

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"Systems are domains of volumes. One difference between a domain and a volume is that a domain cannot have an interior point, because if it did, it would be subject to more economical subdivision. For instance, the vector equilibrium is a system and has a volume, but it consists of 20 domains. A vector equilibrium is not a prime domain or a prime volume, because it has a nucleus and consists of a plurality of definitive volumetric domains. The vector equilibrium is inherently subdivisible as defined by most economical triangulation of all its 12 vertexes into eight tetrahedra and 12 quarter-octahedra, constituting 20 identically volumed, minimum prime domains."

  • Cite SYNERGETICS text at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/1000-omnitopology#section-1011.111011.11; RBF rewrite of 26 Dec'73

C20026

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"As the circumferentially united and finite great-circle chord vectors of the vector equilibrium cohere the radial vectors, so also does the metaphysical cohere the physical."

  • Cite RBF rewrite of SYNERGETICS galley at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/400-system#section-440.08440.08, 4 Nov'73

C20027

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"All the internal, or nuclear, affairs of the individual atoms occur internally to the vector equilibrium. All the external, or chemical compoundings or disassociations, occur externally to the vector equilibrium. All the phenomena external to-- and more complex than-- the five-frequency equilibria relate to chemical compounds. Anything internal to-- or less complex than-- the five-frequency vector equilibrium relates principally to single atoms. Single atoms maintain omnisymmetries; whereas chemical compounds may associate as polarized and asymmetrical chain systems."

  • Cite RBF rewrite of SYNERGETICS galley at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/400-system#section-440.03440.03, 3 Nov'73

C20028

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

The vector equilibrium is a system. It is not a structure. Nor is it a prime volume because it has a nucleus. It is the prime nucleated system. The eight tetrahedra and the six half-octahedra into which the vector equilibrium may be vectorially subdivided are the rational accounting volumes that are relevantly involved.


C20029

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"The omnidirectional, omniwave, propagating pulsivity of Universe realizations is eternally potential and implicit in the vector equilibrium."

  • Cite RBF rewrite of SYNERGETICS galley at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/300-universe#section-310.02310.02, 30 Oct'73

C20030

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"The radial arrangement of unit tetrahedral volumes around an absolute radiation center (the vector equilibrium) constitutes a prime radiational-gravitational proclivity model with a volume of 20 where the cube is 3 and the tetrahedron 1."

  • Citation and context at Planck's Constant (A)(B), 15 May'73

C20031

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Cross Reference

Vector Equilibrium:

"It was the initial quality of seemingly invisible vector equilibrium, as well as that it was not experimentally discoverable, which has kept the vector equilibrium so long unrecognized as the equilibrious model."

  • Cite RBF to EJA, National Airport, 27 Nov'72

Cross-References


C20032

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"The vector equilibrium always and only represents the first omnisymmetric embracement and nucleation of the first-self-discovered-by-otherness-sphere by the completely self-embracing, twelvefold, isotropic, continuous otherness.

"Sphere is prime awareness.

"Spheric domain is prime volume.

"Only self-discoverableSpheric system awareness generates all inwardness, outwardness, and aroundness dimensionality."

  • Cite SYNERGETICS draft at Secs. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/900-modelability#section-981.21981.21-24, 18 Nov'72

C20033

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"On the other hand, the vector equilibrium is the one and only unique symmetric polyhedron inherently recurring as a uniformly angled, centrally triangulated, complex collection of tetrahedra and half-octahedra, while also constituting the simplest and first order of nuclear, isotropically defined, uniformly modulated, inward-outward-and-around, vector-tensor structuring, whereby the vector equilibrium of initial frequency, i.e., 'plus and minus one' equilibrium, is sometimes identified only as 'potential,' whose uniform-length 24 external chords and 12 internal radii, together with its 12 external vertexes and one central vertex, accommodates a galaxy of 12 equiradiused spheres closest packed around one nuclear sphere, with the 13 spheres' respective centers omnicongruent with the vector equilibrium's 12 external and one internal vertex."

  • Cite SYNERGETICS text at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/900-modelability#section-955.02955.02; RBF rewrite of 23 Oct'72

C20034

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Cross Reference

Vector Equilibrium:

". . . . We have now all the permeabilities of the MITE's, and the number of nonregular octahedra and the number of nonregular dodecahedrons. Then we have next the total sphere as the convergence in the vector equilibrium with its spaces . . . and concave. And we have the concept of the limits of asymmetry in respect tb the vector equilibrium as the limit of coming to the molecules. That's what we have: nuclear uniqueness, and all of its variables within the domain of the three-frequency vector equilibrium. . . Dealing with the transformation of the jitterbug and tensegrity forming from tetra to icosa by sliding the point of concentrated pressure, going from the ends to the middle, and our confirmation of the original concept that the vector equilibriums are nuclear structures embracing all the variables of Universe, assogiating all the molecular build-ups, which has to do with syntax because I am holistic and I really don't want to be limited. . . ."

  • Citation and context at Cosmic Fish Sequence (3), 16 Oct'72

Cross-References


C20035

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"Twentyness is significant as the inherent minimum twentyfoldness of the time-space, energy-mass, volume potential of the subfrequency vector equilibrium as quantized by using as unity the geometrical volume of the minimum structural system of Universe: the tetrahedron whose fractional integrity subdivided by the complex of A and B Module reorientations is in the high order number of magnitude of the enzymes' interrelationship permutations."

  • Citation & context at Enzymes, 2 Oct'72

  • Cite SYNERGETICS draft at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/1000-omnitopology#section-1053.051053.05, 2 Oct'72.


C20036

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"As the most compact spherical agglomeration the vector equilibrium expands indefinitely with a new nucleus every four successive generations of symmetrical self-embrace."


C20037

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Cross Reference

Vector Equilibrium:

"Vector equilibrium and ideal are the same. Nature never stops there. Universe has it. But in our temporal life there will always be some degree of lag or asymmetry which misses the exactitude of the ideal. . . "

Cross-References


C20038

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"The vector equilibrium is always facially asymmetrical, but vectorially symmetrical. The tetrakaidecahedron is vertexially asymmetrical but linearly symmetrical."

  • Cite RBF (discussing Tetrakaidecahedron, 31 May'71) dication to EJA, 19 Feb'72

C20039

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"Congruence is allowable only in the vector equilibrium because we can talk about vectors or about circuitry as a design."

  • Citation & context at Congruence, 25 Jan'72

  • Cite RBF to EJA, 3200 Idaho, Washington DC, 25 Jan '72.


C20040

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"Universe is a nonsimultaneously potential vector equilibrium."

  • Cite SYNERGETICS Corollaries, 1971

SYNERGETICS text at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/200-synergetics#section-240.28240.28


C20041

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"Only the vector equilibrium has the same surface and central angles."

  • Cite RBF to EJA, 3200 Idaho, Washington DC, 21 Dec. '71.

C20042

Vector equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

"While nature oscillates and palpitates asymmetrically in respect to the frame of omnirational vector equilibrium, the plus and minus magnitudes of asymmetry are rational fractions of the omnirationality of the equilibrium state, ergo, omnirationally commensurable and modelable to the sixth power-- which order of powering embraces all experimentally disclosed physical behavior. It was the failure of the exclusively three-dimensionality of the XYZ interperpendicular coordination that gave rise to the concept that the "fourth dimension" must be a mysterious state, which might be spoken of casually as a time dimension, because the XYZ coordinates in themselves, as heretofore adopted by man, has seeming validity only in its linear and spatial characteristics independent of time and physical reality." - Cite RBF to EJA, 21 Dec. '71, 1200 Idaho, Wash. DC.


C20043

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

... The syntropic vector equilibrium's reversibility-- inwardly-outwardly-- is the basis for the gravitationally maintained integrity of Universe.


C20044

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"The vector equilibrium itself is only a referential frame of conceptual relationships at which nature never pauses."

  • Cite SYNERGETICS, "Synergetics," \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/200-synergetics#section-219.00219, as re-written by RBF 7 Oct. 1971.

C20045

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"The vector equilibrium consists not of curved lines but of wave lines."

  • Cite RBF to EJA, Bear Island, 25 August, 1971,

  • Citation & context at Push-Pull: Push Wave &Pull Wave, 25 Aug'71


C20046

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"The connection between the six degrees of freedom and omnidirectionality is, of course, the vector equilibrium, which combines the threeness of the cube in relation to 20 as unity = VE. Experience is inherently omnidirectional. Ergo, there is not just one 'other.' There are always at least 12 'others.' Ergo, vector equilibrium, which is subfrequency. Happenability has the vector equilibrium as its minimum model, ergo the Universe, experience, can't be one quantum."


C20047

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"The vector equilibrium remains subfrequency until we have a frequency of two, where frequency begins. Not until we have size, not until we have energetic experienceability, i.e. not until we have reality, do we have structural stabilization of the nuclear 12. . . And even at the frequency of two, the half-octahedra are unstable."

  • Cite RBF to EJA, Bear Island, 23 August 1971.

C20048

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Cross Reference

"One difference between a domain and a volume is that a volume cannot have an interior point, because if it did it would be subject to more economical subdivisions. For instance, the vector equilibrium is a system and not a volume. A vector equilibrium is not a volume because it has a nucleus. The vector equilibrium breaks down into eight tetrahedra and six half octahedra: those being the volumes which are really involved."

  • Cite Synergetics draft, \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/500-conceptuality#section-550.00550-4, August 1971.

Cross-References


C20049

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"The vector equilibrium contains the whole phenomenology of the Universe. The vector equilibrium is never witnessed by man. It is as pure as God. It is truth which is approached; it is exactitude that is approached."

  • "Bucky" by Hugh Kenner, p. 116; probably from Snyder Film or Farrell tape, summer'71

C20050

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"Vector equilibrium is not a structure."

  • Cite RBF to EJA, New York, 8 May 1971.

C20051

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"The vector equilibrium and the isotropic vector matrix are the equilibrium or the central set of conditions through which physical reality palpitates. It never stops at the center. . . You will never be able to catch Nature at the dead center because it has alternate dead centers"


C20052

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"The vector equilibrium is absolutely dead center of Universe and will never be seen by man in any physical experience-- yet it is the frame of reference. And it is not in rotation and it is sizeless and timeless. . ."

  • Cite tape transcript RBF to BO'R, Carbondale Dome, p. 39, 1 May '71

C20053

Vector equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector equilibrium:

"This omniradiational isotropic vector system accounting shows a set of values corresponding to the omnirational quantation of all chemistry's associative or disassociative events. It also shows that the vector equilibrium-- consisting basically of twenty tetrahedraal quanta-- is at once the concentric push-pull interchange, vectorial phase or zone, of neutral resonance which occurs between outwardly pushing wave propagation and inwardly pulling gravitational coherence."

  • Cite Nehru Speech, p. 26, 13 Nov'69

C20054

Vector equilibrium

← Vector equilibrium | Vector equilibrium →


Cross Reference

Vector equilibrium:

"The polyhedral shape of these nuclear assemblages of closest packed spheres . . . is always that of the vector equilibrium (or cuboctahedron), having always six square faces and eight triangular faces. They are vector equilibrium models because their explosive and implosive forces are always equal, as is shown by their four-dimensional hexagonal cross sections whose radial and circumferential vectors balance. Nature never pauses her cycling at the equilibrium phase. She always closes her transformative cycles at the maximum positive or negative asymmetry stages. See the delicate crystal asymmetry in nature."

Cross-References


C20055

Vector equilibrium

← Vector equilibrium | Vector equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector equilibrium:

"The vector equilibrium's volume is always frequency to the third power times twenty. When the vector equilibrium's frequency is one (or radiationally inactive) its volume is 20 x 1^3 = 20."

Cite Nehru Speech, p. 26, 13 Nov'69


C20056

Vector equilibrium

← Vector equilibrium | Vector equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector equilibrium:

"For wave propagation I had already found nature using the vector equilibrium as the neutral geometric configuration occurring between the radiational and gravitational forces."

  • Cite RBF holograph, Bear Island, 18 Sep '69

C20057

Vector equilibrium

← Vector equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Cross Reference

Vector equilibrium:

"The volume of the vector equilibrium consists of eight tetrahedra and six half-octahedra. Therefore, the volume of the vector equilibrium is exactly twenty."

Cross-References

  • Illustration # 28

C20058

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium (1) →


Index Entry

The vector equilibrium is the "most compact spherical agglomeration;" it "expands to infinity" with "a new nucleus every four orbits." (Adapted.)


C20059

Vector Equilibrium (1)

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium (2) →


Index Entry

The vector equilibrium is of the greatest importance to all of us because all the nuclear tendencies to implosion and explosion are reversible and always in exact balance. But the important thing is that the radials which, if they are outwardly pushing, would tend to explode, are always frustrated by the tensile finiteness of the circumferential vectors which close together in an orderly manner to cohere the disorderly sundering.

When the radial vector are tensiley contractive and separately implosive, they are always prevented from doing so by the finitely closing pushers or compressors of the circumferential set of vectors. The integrity of Universe is implicit in the external finiteness of the circumferential set which always encloses the otherwise divisive internal radial set of omnidirectional vectors.

All the internal or nuclear affairs of the atom occur internally to the vector equilibrium and all the external or chemical associations occur externally to the vector equilibrium.

  • Cite NASA Speech, p.83, Jun'66

C20060

Vector Equilibrium (2)

← Vector Equilibrium (1) | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"The vector equilibrium itself is never found exactly symmetrical in nature's crystallography. Nature, which is ever pulsive and impulsive, refuses to get caught unrecoverably at the zerophase of energy. Therefore, there will always be positive and negative sets which are ever interchangeably intertransformative with uniquely differentiable characteristics. The vector equilibrium is the true zero reference of the energetic mathematics."

  • Cite NASA Speech, p.83, Jun'66

C20061

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium (2) | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"The geometrical form constituted by the twenty volumes of tetrahedra is called the vector equilibrium because the value of its radial vectors is exactly matched by the finitely closed, circumferentially arrayed vectors of opposite implosive-explosive potential."

  • Cite-Carbondate Draft Return-to-Modelability, p. 4.16. (cite NASA 3rd Ed., p. 81, Jun '66)

C20062

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"The metaphysical, as with the circumferentially united, great-circle chord vectors of the vector equilibrium, coheres the physical."

  • Citation and context at Metaphysical and Physical, Jun'66

C20063

Vector equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

'The Dymaxion', this seemed to me, in due course, to be presumptuous as it is nature's most fundamental of all energy interactions, i.e., the vector equilibrium.


C20064

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector equilibrium | Vector equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"I found this √10·F² + 2√ relationship first in respect to what I call the vector equilibrium (which is usually known by its ambiguous Platonic title, the 'cubo-octahedron.') I gave it its title of vector equilibrium because of its four symmetrically interacting great-circle planes, each consisting of hexagonally bound planes-- visible when the vector equilibrium is cut into two halves, by any one of its four great-circle planes. Because they are radii of similar hexagons, the twelve radii of the vector equilibrium are equal in length to the 24 chordal edges which bind the four hexagonal hemi-sections of the system."


C20065

Vector equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector equilibrium:

"Because each of the twelve radii of the vector equilibrium consist of two congruent radii, of the 24 radii of the four hexagonal hemi-sections, the sum of the vectorial values of the radii is 24-- and the vectorial sum of the finitely closed chordal perimeters of the four hexagons is also 24-- which means that the vector equilibrium's explosive or implosive forces are in equilibrium with its externally and finitely containing tense bonds or compressively spread or strutted structural system."

  • Cite RBF Ltr. to Dr. Robt. W. Horne, 1 Dec '65, p.1.

C20066

Vector equilibrium

← Vector equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

'Unitary symmetry' is conceivably? ... my vector equilibrium discovered in early 1917 and named 'vector equilibrium' in 1940.

  • Cite RBF marginalia on article by F.T. Matthews, "The Pattern of Matter," The Listener, 25 Nov. 1965. Matthews uses the term 'unitary symmetry' to describe hexagonal patterns of particles of spin.

C20067

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"Vector equilibrium, i.e., a structural [sic - EJA] system in which the radial vectors and the circumferential vectors are of equal magnitude; ergo the tendency to explode or to contract is in equilibrium; either could but neither does, unless something is added or subtracted to change the dynamic balance. Equilibrium is a 'dangerous' condition because-- due to entropy-- something is always about to be added or subtracted to change the balance.

"When an airplane stalls it is in equilibrium. The vector equilibrium consists of four symmetrically interdisposed planes. These four planes are parallel to the four unique, symmetrically interdisposed planes of the regular tetrahedron. The vector equilibrium shown in the picture is subpatterned with a two-fold, modular frequency, edge and radius subdivision. Both radial and circumferential frequencies of modular subdivision of the vector equilibrium are always, everywhere, equal, in both magnitude and number.

"The volume of the vector equilibrium is always 20 times frequency to the third power, written as 20 F³.

  • Cite Conceptuality of Fundamental Structures (Kepes) p.69, 1965 (Caption, Fig. 3)

C20068

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"The vector equilibrium is also known as an isotropic vector matrix. The vertexes of the vector equilibrium of any frequency are always congruent with spheres of equal radius in closest packing. . .

"The number of vertexes in the vector equilibrium, which are always the same as the number of the spheres in omnisymmetrical closest packing, are always: frequency to the second power times ten plus two-- written as 10 F^2 + 2."

  • Cite Conceptuality of Fundamental Structures (Kepes), p.69, 1965 (Caption, Fig. 3)

C20069

Vector equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Cross Reference

Vector equilibrium:

"All of the fundamental forms of the crystals are involved in the vector equilibrium. It is a starting point, not anything in its own right, if it is a vector equilibrium."

  • Cite LODGEMENT LAB Lecture, 15 Oct '64, p. 29

Cross-References


C20070

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector equilibrium | Vector equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"The word frequency would never relate to the word one, because frequency involves some plurality of events. Therefore, frequency would begin at two. . . Therefore, vector equilibrium . . . a one-frequency system . . . is really subsize. . . . Looking at vector equilibrium as unity-- as all the domain of a point . . . we find that it has a volume of 480."

  • Cite RBF Lecture 8 p. 280 12 Jul'62

  • Citation at Frequency, 12 Jul'62


C20071

Vector equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector equilibrium:

" . . . The twelve radials are the twelve degrees of freedom . . . "

" . . . Two of those degrees of freedom are always subject to being polarized. . . "

  • Cite Oregon Lecture #7, p. 238. + p. 242. 11 Jul'62

C20072

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"In the vector equilibrium form we have an enormous number of random lines running omnidirectionally which begin to triangulate omnidirectionally. On of the important aspects of this is that it consists of four planes. At its equator it has a hexagon and four hexagonal planes crossing each other at the center of the system. Those four hexagonal planes correspond to the four faces of the tetrahedron, and they are parallel to them. . . It has eight tetrahedra; there is one on the top, or four altogether in the northern hemisphere and four in the southern hemisphere. And there are six one-half octahedra. There are six square faces and eight triangular faces and the square faces are part of the half octahedra. Therefore it consists of six on-half octahedra each with a volume of two, 6 x 2 = 12, and eight tetrahedra each with a volume of one, so 8 + 12 = 20.

"Vector equilibrium: /is derived from/ 12 composited spheres around one.

  • Cite Carbondale-draft Nature's Coordination, pp. VI.22,23

  • Cite - OREGON #7 p.223,

-OREGON #7 - p 249,250, 11 Jul'62


C20073

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"It is called the vector equilibrium because its radials are all the same length as its circumferentials. Representing a geometry of vectors it tends to explode or contract . . . opposing one another so that they are in equilibrium with exactly the same values."

  • Cite OREGON Lecture #5 - p. 179, 9 Jul'62

C20074

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

The vector equilibrium is "the Grand Central Station of the coordinate mathematical-physical system that is apparently the coordinate system employed by nature to account most economically for its myriad transactions."


C20075

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"A zero tetrahedron is vector equilibrium is Universe."

  • Citation at Tetrahedron: Zero Tetrahedron, 1960

C20076

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium (1) →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"Universe is a nonsimultaneously potential vector equilibrium."

  • Cite SYNERGETICS Corollaries, \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/200-synergetics#section-240.00240. Oct'59

C20077

Vector Equilibrium (1)

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium (2) →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"The vector equilibrium represents:

A. The energy Universe in equilibrium;

B. (Corollary) The Universe at dynamic 'centerpoint' and at static 'center point;'

C. The geodesic centers of influence and convergent intercourse;

D. A four-dimensional Universe from which universal dynamics 'slip by' into three-dimensional aspects;

E. Energy at absolute expansion; Energy at absolute contraction; Energy at absolute heat; Energy at absolute zero;

F. Rational number fractionation of Universe;"

  • Cite Rbf Synergetics notes, Feb'48

C20078

Vector Equilibrium (2)

← Vector Equilibrium (1) | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium:

"G. The absolute network of energy articulation including proclivities of--

Chemical,

Biological,

Electrical,

Crystallographic,

Vector-tensor,

Thermal,

Geologic,

Geodetic,

Expansion-contraction,

Spin,

Wave propagation mechanics,

Wave network,

Insideoutability,

Special plus-minus polarity phase,

Gravitational,

Mensurability in comprehensive constants of rational number."

  • Cite RBF Synergetics notes, Feb'48

C20079

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium (2) | Vector Equilibrium Articulation Of →


Index Entry

The Vector equilibrium "is the common denominator of the tetrahedron, octahedron and cube. It is the decimal unit within the octave system. Double its radius for octave expansion." - Cite DYMAXION COINP. SYSTEM, 1944, Table 4, caption


C20080

Vector Equilibrium Articulation Of

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector_Equilibrium: Axes →


Cross Reference

Vector Equilibrium: Propagative Transformation Of

Cross-References


C20081

Vector_Equilibrium: Axes

← Vector Equilibrium Articulation Of | Vector Equilibrium: Complementary to Vector Equilibrium →


RBF Definitions

"Only one axis of the eight tetrahedra in the vector equilibrium may be active at any given time: three are passive and one is active."

Citations

  1. RBF to EJA, 200 Locust, Phila.; 28 Jan'76

C20082

Vector Equilibrium: Complementary to Vector Equilibrium

← Vector_Equilibrium: Axes | VE: Complementary →


Cross Reference

Vector Equilibrium: Complementary to Vector Equilibrium:

"In the vector equilibrium we have all the sets of the tetrahedra bivalently or edge-joined, as well as centrally univalent. Synergetics calls the basally developed larger tetrahedron [see Star Tetrahedron.] the non-mirror-imaged complementary of the vector equilibrium. In vectorial energy content and dynamic symmetry lies the complementarity."

  • Cite SYNERGETICS draft "Antitetrahedron," 8 Oct. '71, page 6.

Cross-References


C20083

VE: Complementary

← Vector Equilibrium: Complementary to Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium Eight-pointed Star System →


Cross Reference

Negative VE

Star Tetrahedron & VE

Cross-References


C20084

Vector Equilibrium Eight-pointed Star System

← VE: Complementary | Vector Equilibrium as Empty Set Tetrahedron →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium: Eight-pointed Star System:

"The same vector equilibrium's eight, nuclear-embracing, bivalent tetrahedra's eight nuclear congruent vertexes may be simultaneously outwardly pulsed through their radially-opposite, outward triangular exits to form eight externally pointing tetrahedra, which thus become only univalently, i.e., only-single-vertex interlinked, and altogether symmetrically arrayed around the vector equilibrium's eight outward 'faces.' The thus-formed, eight-pointed star system consisting of the vector equilibrium's volume of 20 (tetrahedral unity), plus the eight star-point-arrayed tetrahedra, total volumetrically to 28. This number, 28, introduces the prime number seven factored exclusively with the prime number two, as already discovered in the unity-twoness of the tetrahedron's always and only co-occurring, concave-convex, inherently disparate, behavioral duality. This phenomenon may be compared with the 28-ness in the Coupler accounting as described in section \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/900-modelability#section-954.72954.72."


C20085

Vector Equilibrium as Empty Set Tetrahedron

← Vector Equilibrium Eight-pointed Star System | Vector Equilibrium as Empty Set Tetrahedron →


Index Entry

"The inherent zero-disconnectedness accounts for the finite energy packaging and discontinuity of Universe. The vector equilibria are the empty set tetrahedra of Universe, i.e., the tetrahedron, being the minimum structural system of Universe independent of size, its four facet planes are at maximum remoteness from their opposite vertexes and may have volume content of the third power of the linear frequency. Whereas in the vector equilibrium all four planes of the tetrahedra pass through the same opposite vertex-- which is the nuclear vertex-- and have no volume, frequency being zero: F⁰." Cite RBF addition to SYNERGETICS galley at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/400-system#section-415.45415.45, 2 Nov'73


C20086

Vector Equilibrium as Empty Set Tetrahedron

← Vector Equilibrium as Empty Set Tetrahedron | Vector Equilibrium: Field of Energy →


Cross Reference

Cross-References

  • Vector Equilibrium: Zerophase Zero Frequency

C20087

Vector Equilibrium: Field of Energy

← Vector Equilibrium as Empty Set Tetrahedron | Vector Equilibrium: Field of Energy →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium: Field of Energy:

"The geometrical model of energy configurations in synergetics is developed from a symmetrical cluster of spheres, in which each sphere is a model of a field of energy all of whose forces tend to coordinate themselves, shuntingly or pulsatively, and only momentarily in positive or negative asymmetrical patterns relative to, but never congruent with, the eternality of the vector equilibrium. The vectors connecting the centers of the adjacent spheres are identical in length and angular relationship. The forces of the field of energy represented by each sphere interoscillate through the symmetry of equilibrium to various asymmetries, never pausing at equilibrium. The vector equilibrium itself is only a referential pattern of conceptual relationships at which nature never pauses. This closest packing of spheres in 60-degree angular relationships demonstrates a finite system in universal geometry.

"Synergetics is comprehensive because it describes instantaneously both the internal and external limit relationships of the sphere or spheres of energetic fields; that is, singularly concentric, or plurally expansive, or propagative and repro-"


C20088

Vector Equilibrium: Field of Energy

← Vector Equilibrium: Field of Energy | Vector Equilibrium Field of Energy →


Index Entry

ductive in all directions, in either spherical or plane geometrical terms and in simple arithmetic.

"When energy-as-heat is progressively extracted from systems by cryogenics, the geometries visibly approach equilibrium; that is to say, removing energy-as-heat reduces the asymmetrical pulsativeness in respect to equilibrium. As the asymmetric kinetics of energy-as-heat are removed, and absolute zero is neared, the whole field of vectors approaches identical length and identical angular interaction; that is to say, they approach the model of closest-packed spherical energy fields. The lines interconnecting the adjacent spheres' centers constitute a vectorial matrix in which all the lines and angles are identical, which is spoken of by the mathematical physicists as the isotropic vector matrix; i.e, where all the energy vectors are identical; i.e., in equilibrium: the cosmically absolute zero.

  • Cite SYNERGETICS text at Sec.s \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/200-synergetics#section-205.01205.01-\hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/200-synergetics#section-205.02205.02, galley rewrite, 11 Oct'73

C20089

Vector Equilibrium Field of Energy

← Vector Equilibrium: Field of Energy | Vector Equilibrium: Field of Energy →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium Field of Energy:

"Metaphysically, the isotropic vector matrix is conceptually permitted. The difference between the physical and the metaphysical is the omnipulsative asymmetry of all physical oscillation in respect to the equilibrium. Metaphysical is equilibrious and physical is disequilibrious."

"The metaphysically permitted frame of reference for all the asymmetrical physical experience of humanity is characterized by the 60-degree coordination with which synergetics explores nature's behaviors-- metaphysical or physical.

The phenomenon of time entering into energy is just a metaphysical concept. It explains our slowness and our limitations. Temporality is time, and the relative asymmetries of oscillation are realizable only in time-- in the time required for pulsative frequency cycling. Synergetics correlates the verities of time and eternity. The awareness of life is always a complex of cognition and recognition lags. Lags are wave frequency aberrations.

The vectorial coordinate system deriving from closest packing of spheres permits fourth- and fifth-power models of modular-";


C20090

Vector Equilibrium: Field of Energy

← Vector Equilibrium Field of Energy | Vector Equilibrium: Field of Energy →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium: Field of Energy:

"volume symmetrical aggregations around single points in an omnidirectional, symmetrical, allspace-filling radial growth. The unit of modular volumetric measurement is the tetrahedron, whose 60-degree angles and six equilength edges disclose omnipersistent, one-to-one correspondence of radial wave modular growth with circumferential modular frequency growth of the totally involved vectorial geometry. This means that angular and linear accelerations are identical. This is a rational convenience prohibited by 90-degree coordination, whose most economical circumferential geometries are in most cases inherently irrational.

"The angular and linear accelerations of synergetics' isotropic, vectorially triangulated, omnidirectional matrix initiations are rational and uniformly modulated; whereas in the XYZ 90-degree coordinate analysis and plotting of the computational findings of the calculus, only the linear is analyzable and the angular resultants are usually irrationally expressed.

"The frequency and magnitude of event occurrences of any system are comprehensively and discretely controllable by valving,"


C20091

Vector Equilibrium: Field of Energy

← Vector Equilibrium: Field of Energy | Vector Equilibrium: Field of Energy (1) →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium: Field of Energy:

"that is, by angle and frequency modulation. Angle and frequency modulation exclusively define all experiences, which events altogether constitute Universe.

  • Cite SYNERGETICS text at \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/200-synergetics#section-208.00208, Oct'71

C20092

Vector Equilibrium: Field of Energy (1)

← Vector Equilibrium: Field of Energy | Vector Equilibrium: Field of Energy (2) →


Index Entry

"The geometrical model of energy configurations in synergetics is developed from a symmetrical cluster of spheres, in which each sphere is a model of a field of energy all of whose forces tend to coordinate themselves, shuttlingly or pulsatively, and only momentarily in positive or negative asymmetrical patterings relative to the most eternal form of the vector equilibrium. The vectors connecting the centers of the adjacent spheres are identical in length and angular relationship. The forces of the field of energy represented by each sphere oscillate through the symmetry of equilibrium to various asymmetries while never pausing at equilibrium. The vector equilibrium itself is only a referential frame of conceptual relationships at which nature never pauses. This closest packing of spheres in 60-degree angular relationships demonstrates a finite system in universal geometry. Synergetics is comprehensive because it describes instantaneously both the internal and external relationships of the sphere or spheres of energetic fields; that is, singularly concentric, or plurally expansive, or propagative and reproductive in all directions, in eitherspherical or plane geometrical terms and in simple arithmetic.


C20093

Vector Equilibrium: Field of Energy (2)

← Vector Equilibrium: Field of Energy (1) | Vector Equilibrium Field →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium: Field of Energy:

  • Cite: all but the last sentence: RBF dictation to EJA for SYNERGETICS, Beverly Hotel, New York, 28 Feb'71; rewritten by RBF at \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/200-synergetics#section-205.10205.1, Oct'71
  • Cite Last sentence: Dymaxion Comprehensive System, Table 4, caption, 1944

C20094

Vector Equilibrium Field

← Vector Equilibrium: Field of Energy (2) | Vector Equilibrium Field (1) →


RBF Definitions

RBF DEFINITIONS

"While nature oscillates and palpitates asymmetrically in

respect to the omnirational vector-equilibrium field, the plus

and minus magnitudes of asymmetry are rational fractions of

the omnirationality of the equilibrium state, ergo, omniration-

ionally commensurable to the fourth power, volumetrically,

which order of powering embraces all experimentally disclosed

physical volumetric behavior."

Cite RBF rewrite of SYNERGETICS text at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/900-modelability#section-966.10966.10, 20 Dec'73

Cross-References


C20095

Vector Equilibrium Field (1)

← Vector Equilibrium Field | Vector Equilibrium Frame →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20096

Vector Equilibrium Frame

← Vector Equilibrium Field (1) | Vector Equilibrium Frame →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium Frame:

"The vector equilibrium is the anywhere, anytime, eternally regenerative, event inceptioning and evolutionary accommodation and will never be seen by man in any physical experience. Yet it is the frame of evolvement. It is sizeless and timeless. We have its mathematics, which deals discretely with the chordal lengths. The radial vectors and circumferential vectors are the same size."

  • Cite RBF rewrite of SYNERGETICS galley at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/400-system#section-440.04440.04, 3 Nov'73

C20097

Vector Equilibrium Frame

← Vector Equilibrium Frame | Vector Equilibrium Frame →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium Frame:

"All local events of Universe may be calculatively anticipated by inaugurating calculation with a local vector_equilibrium frame and identifying the disturbance initiating point, direction, and energy of introduced action."

  • Cite Colliers Ltr., McKale, p.114, Oct'59

C20098

Vector Equilibrium Frame

← Vector Equilibrium Frame | Vector Equilibrium: Frequency Of →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20099

Vector Equilibrium: Frequency Of

← Vector Equilibrium Frame | Vector Equilibrium: Great Circles Of (1) →


Index Entry

Where frequency is one /as in the vector equilibrium/, it just means it isn't frequent. Which means frequency must be two or more /except in the vector equilibrium which is subsize/. in the vector equilibrium where frequency is one, there is only one interval: the first layer = 10 P^2 + 2 = 12. Twelve balls of the first layer. The center ball has a value of two for outside-inside, convex-concave: terminal condition. But the center ball's frequency is zero.


C20100

Vector Equilibrium: Great Circles Of (1)

← Vector Equilibrium: Frequency Of | Vector Equilibrium: Great Circles Of (2) →


RBF Definitions

"The great circle planes of the vector equilibrium projected as true circles on a sphere represent the equators of spin... The vector equilibrium has 14 faces which represent the 14 main aspects of a regular tetrahedron. Six of these faces are square and they are symmetrical to one another. We can pair the square faces so that there are three pairs of square faces and we can interconnect their opposite centers of gravity, which provides three axes corresponding to the XYZ coordinates. We can spin the vector equilibrium on any one of these three axes of symmetry to produce three equators of spin. These we speak of as the 'vector Equilibrium's three great circles.

"There are also the eight triangular facets of the vector equilibrium. If we take the opposite midpoints of these eight triangles, we can pair them into four sets giving us four axes and spin the vector equilibrium on these axes to produce four equators of spin of the vector Equilibrium's four great circles.

"The vector equilibrium also has 12 vertexes which provide six axes of spin. These produce the vector equilibrium's six great circles. The vector equilibrium has one other set of symmetrical"

Citations

  1. Oregon Lecture #6, p. 225, 10 Jul'62; RBF rewrite, Aug'71 SYSTEM- SECS, \href{https://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/400-system#section-450.01}{450.01} → THRU 0.6

C20101

Vector Equilibrium: Great Circles Of (2)

← Vector Equilibrium: Great Circles Of (1) | Vector Equilibrium: Great Circles Of (3) →


Index Entry

axes: if we take the 24 mid-edge points and interconnect their diametric opposites, we get 12 axes of spin; when rotated these generate the vector equilibrium's '12 great circles,' which run from the corners to the opposite mid-edges of the vector equilibrium's six squares.

"So we now have three axes (from midpoints of the squares); plus four axes (from midpoints of the triangular facets); plus 6 axes (from vertexes); plus 12 axes (from the mid-edges of the squares). 3 + 4 + 6 + 12 = 25, for a total of 25 great circles for the vector equilibrium.

"It is a characteristic of all those great circles that every one of them go through two or more of the 12 vertexes and these 12 vertexes correspond to all the points of tangency of closest packed spheres: four go through six; three go through four; six go through two; and 12 go through two."


C20102

Vector Equilibrium: Great Circles Of (3)

← Vector Equilibrium: Great Circles Of (2) | Vector Equilibrium: Great Circles Of →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium: Great Circles Of:

"It is a characteristic of all these great circles of the vector equilibrium that every one of them go through at least two of the 12 vertexes.

"When spheres are closely packed, what do we mean by that? Let us take four billiard balls on a billiard table. We get them as close together as we can, and they could make a square; but they are unstable as a square. Let them rotate a little as ball bearings and they become a diamond; and then they are stable because they consist of two triangles and triangles are stable. I can get three together stably or I can get six-around-one stably, or four as a diamond. They pack in omnitriangulation and that is called closest packing.

"I can get 12 spheres around one omnidirectionally-- six around it in a plane and 12 omnidirectionally. The 12 balls then are in the position of the 12 vertexes of the vector equilibrium where we say all the radii are identical in length. This would be the radii of the spheres. We would have a sphere the same size as the center of the system and its radius would use up half of the radius of the vector equilibrium's radials. They"


C20103

Vector Equilibrium: Great Circles Of

← Vector Equilibrium: Great Circles Of (3) | Vector Equilibrium: Great Circles Of →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium: Great Circles Of:

"would be tangent to one another, giving us 12 balls tangent around one. In the closest packing of spheres, which the physicist finds is employed by nature in the basic gridding of all agglomerations of atoms-- and we find time and again nature using this closest packing for basic coordination-- and you always get 12 around one. The 12-around-one would then be at these various points.

"Therefore in finding all the sets of great circles which can be generated by all the axes of symmetry of a vector equilibrium, and finding that they all go through the 12 vertexes is very interesting, because if this sphere were tangent to other spheres these would be its points of tangency in closest packing. The point of tangency of spheres in closest packing would be a very important point because any energy traveling over the surface of one sphere to get to another sphere would have to go through a point of tangency to the next sphere.

"The great circles represent the shortest distances between points on a sphere; they are the most economical lines on a sphere. These 25 great circles represent all the railroad tracks of energy following the shortest distance between points-- all the possible railroad tracks that go through all the points of"


C20104

Vector Equilibrium: Great Circles Of

← Vector Equilibrium: Great Circles Of | Vector equilibrium: Great Circles Of (1) →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium: Great Circles Of:

"tangency of other spheres. Therefore, energy could travel from sphere to sphere in closest packing following the surface of the spheres, but in order to do so it would have to follow the most economical distance between those points and it would have to go on one of these railroad tracks. These are the railroad tracks of energy following the surfaces of spheres of closest packing. These are the most economical distances. Therefore they get to be quite important kinds of lines."

  • Cite Oregon Lecture #6, p.227, 10 Jul'62

C20105

Vector equilibrium: Great Circles Of (1)

← Vector Equilibrium: Great Circles Of | Vector Equilibrium: Great Circles Of (2) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20106

Vector Equilibrium: Great Circles Of (2)

← Vector equilibrium: Great Circles Of (1) | Vector Equilibrium Growth →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20107

Vector Equilibrium Growth

← Vector Equilibrium: Great Circles Of (2) | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium Growth:

"Vector equilibrium growth from unity is nuclear: 1 → 12, 12 → 42, 42 → 92, etc."

  • Citation & context at Tetrahedral Growth, 13 Nov'75

C20108

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium Growth | Vector Equilibrium: Eight New Nuclei at Fifth Frequency →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium: Eight New Nuclei at Fifth Frequency:

"Frequency five embraces nine new nuclei: the original central nucleus plus eight new nuclei occurring at the centers of volume of the eight tetrahedrons symmetrically surrounding the nucleus, with each of the nine enclosed with a minimum of two layers of spheres. VE at f⁰ = 12; f² = 42; f³ = 92; f⁴ = 162; and at f⁵ = 252 we get eight new nuclei; therefore their eightness of 'begettness' relates to the eight triangles of the VE. Six nucleated octahedra with two layer omni-enclosure of their nuclei does not occur until f⁶ = 362 in the outer shell of the VE. At this stage we have six new nuclei, with fourteen nuclei surrounding the fifteenth, or original, nucleus."

  • Cite RBF tape fragment, Fairfield, Conn., 18 Jun'71; rewritten by RBF Wash. DC, 7 Oct'71; and on 28 May '72

C20109

Vector Equilibrium: Eight New Nuclei at Fifth Frequency

← Vector Equilibrium | VE & Icosa →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium: Eight New Nuclei at Fifth Frequency:

"Frequency five embraces nine nuclei: the original central nucleus plus eight new nuclei occurring at the centers of volume of the eight tetrahedra symmetrically surrounding the nucleus, with each of the nine enclosed with a minimum of two layers of spheres.

"P0 = 12; F2 = 42; F3 = 92; F4 = 162; and at F5 = 252 we get eight new nuclei; therefore their eightness of 'begetness' relates to the eight triangles of the vector equilibrium.

"Six nucleated octahedra with two-layer omnienclosure of their nuclei does not occur until P6 and the vector equilibrium's outer shell = 362; at this stage we have six new nuclei with 14 surrounding the 15th, or original, nucleus."


C20110

VE & Icosa

← Vector Equilibrium: Eight New Nuclei at Fifth Frequency | VE & Icosa →


RBF Definitions

"The icosahedron is the structuring of the VE."

  • Citation & context at Synergetica: Evolution Of, 14 Oct'76

C20111

VE & Icosa

← VE & Icosa | VE & Icosa →


Index Entry

The icosahedron and its 12 vertices represents the denucleated phase of the nucleated vector equilibrium with its 12 vertices.

Citation & context at Dymaxion Airocean World Map,(3), 26 Aug'75


C20112

VE & Icosa

← VE & Icosa | VE & Icosa →


RBF Definitions

"The original-- only vertexially-single-bonded, vectorially-structured-- triangles of the vector equilibrium jitterbug transform by symmetrical contraction from it openmost vector-equilibrium state, through the {unstable-without-six-additional-vector inserts; i.e., one vectorial quantum unit) icosahedral stage only as accommodated by the nuclear sphere's annihilation, which vanished central sphere reappears transformedly in the 30-vector-edged icosahedron as the six additional external vectors added to the vector equilibrium to structurally stabilize its six "square" faces, which six vectors constitute one quantum package."


C20113

VE & Icosa

← VE & Icosa | VE & Icosa (1) →


RBF Definitions

"Reminiscent of electron proclivities, the icosahedron displays the same surface number of spherically conformed, energy-event packages and its only-one-wavelength-deep, single, outer sphere layer array is omnitriangulated, while the vector equilibrium's surface is arrayed two-fifths in triangulation and three-fifths in open, unstable, square tangency. As spherical agglomerates decrease in radius-- as, for instance, do the vector equilibria's contract to the icosahedral phase-- their sphere centers approach one another, and Newton's mass-interattraction law, which shows a second-power gain as the interproximities are halved, imposes an intercoherence condition whereby as their overall system radius decreases, their circumferential mass-interattractions increase exponentially as r², where r = radius of the system."

Citations

  1. RBF rewrite of SYNERGETICS galley at Sec. \href{https://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/1000-omnitopology#section-1052.44}{1052.44}, Beverly Hotel, NYC, 9 Jan'74

C20114

VE & Icosa (1)

← VE & Icosa | VE & Icosa (2) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20115

VE & Icosa (2)

← VE & Icosa (1) | Integral Negative →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20116

Integral Negative

← VE & Icosa (2) | Vector Equilibrium Involvement Domain →


Cross Reference

Cross-References

  • Negative VE, 8 Oct'71

C20117

Vector Equilibrium Involvement Domain

← Integral Negative | Vector Equilibrium Involvement Domain →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium Involvement Domain:

"How can an object move through water, which is a noncompressible substance? By the intertransformability of spheres becoming spaces and spaces becoming spheres. This is how the annihilation model works in allspace filling. The vector equilibrium and the eight one-eighth-octahedra on the triangular facets make up the nucleated cube. The annihilation model functions at the eight corners of the vector equilibrium.

"In an analogous intertransformability manner the one-quantum-annihilating octahedron which in one-eighth-octahedron increments complements the zero-to-twenty-volume vector equilibrium by furnishing the eight corners."


C20118

Vector Equilibrium Involvement Domain

← Vector Equilibrium Involvement Domain | Vector Equilibrium Involvement Domain →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium Involvement Domain:

"How do you walk through water? By the intertransformability of spheres becoming spaces and spaces becoming spheres. This is how the annihilation model works in allspace-filling. The vector equilibrium and the eight one-eighth-octahedra on the triangular facets make up the nucleated cube. The annihilation model functions at the eight corners."

  • Cite RBF to EJA, 3200 Idaho Ave, Wash. DC; 23 Apr'76

C20119

Vector Equilibrium Involvement Domain

← Vector Equilibrium Involvement Domain | Vector Equilibrium Involvement Domain →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium Involvement Domain:

"The vector equilibrium has the comprehensive, nuclear concentric, intertransformability involvement domain."

"The sphere of tetravolume 5 is involved with the rhombic dodecahedron of tetravolume 6."

"It takes two of the nucleated cubes because the cube is tetravolume 3."

  • Cite RBF to EJA, 3200 Idaho, Wash. DC; recorded 12 Dec'75

C20120

Vector Equilibrium Involvement Domain

← Vector Equilibrium Involvement Domain | Vector Equilibrium Involvement Domain (1) →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium Involvement Domain:

"The total involvement domain of the vector equilibrium can be either two of the nuclear cubes #### unstable or the rhombic dodecahedron (=stable). The two cubes and one rhombic dodecahedron are intertransformable aspects of the vector equilibrium domain."

  • Cite RBF to EJA holograph, Wash. DC, 11 Dec'75

C20121

Vector Equilibrium Involvement Domain (1)

← Vector Equilibrium Involvement Domain | Vector Equilibrium Involvement Domain (2) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20122

Vector Equilibrium Involvement Domain (2)

← Vector Equilibrium Involvement Domain (1) | Vector Equilibrium: Lending & Borrowing Model →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20123

Vector Equilibrium: Lending & Borrowing Model

← Vector Equilibrium Involvement Domain (2) | Vector Equilibrium: Lending & Borrowing Model →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium: Lending & Borrowing Model:

"Atoms borrow electrons when they combine. The open and unstable square faces of the vector equilibrium provide a model for the lending and borrowing operations. When the frequency is three, we can lend four balls from each square. Four is the greatest number of electrons that can be lent: here is a limit condition with the three-frequency and the four-ball edge. All the borrowing and the lending operates in the squares. The triangles do not get jeopardized by virtue of the lending. A lending and borrowing vector equilibrium is maintained without losing the structural integrity of Universe."

  • Cite RBF rewrite of SYNERGETICS galley at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/900-modelability#section-942.64942.64, 20 Dec'73

C20124

Vector Equilibrium: Lending & Borrowing Model

← Vector Equilibrium: Lending & Borrowing Model | Vector Equilibrium: Odd or Even Shell Growth →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20125

Vector Equilibrium: Odd or Even Shell Growth

← Vector Equilibrium: Lending & Borrowing Model | Vector Equilibrium: Odd or Even Shell growth →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium: Odd or Even Shell Growth:

"The vector equilibrium accommodates positive or negative numbers. The shell generating frequencies of the vector equilibrium are either odd or even. The shell generating frequencies of the octahedron, tetrahedron or cube are only even numbers."

(RBF identifies the above as a Basic Discovery of Synergetics.)

  • Cite RBF to EJA, Washington, DC, 7 Oct. 1971.

C20126

Vector Equilibrium: Odd or Even Shell growth

← Vector Equilibrium: Odd or Even Shell Growth | Vector Equilibrium: Odd or Even Shell Growth →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium: Odd or Even Shell growth:

"Only the vector equilibrium accommodates symmetrical growth or contraction of a nucleus-containing concentric shell series characterized by either even or odd numbers of shells-- a smooth progression of odd or even numbers of shells."

  • Cite RBF to EJA, Haverford, Penna., 11 Oct. '71.

CONCENTRIC SHELL GROWTH - SEC. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/400-system#section-414.01414.01 +02


C20127

Vector Equilibrium: Odd or Even Shell Growth

← Vector Equilibrium: Odd or Even Shell growth | Vector Equilibrium Package →


Cross Reference

Vector Equilibrium: Odd or Even Shell Growth:

Cross-References


C20128

Vector Equilibrium Package

← Vector Equilibrium: Odd or Even Shell Growth | Vector-equilibrium Phase →


Cross Reference

Vector Equilibrium Package: See Dimensional Growth, 20 Dec'73

Cross-References


C20129

Vector-equilibrium Phase

← Vector Equilibrium Package | Vector Equilibrium: Polarization (1) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20130

Vector Equilibrium: Polarization (1)

← Vector-equilibrium Phase | Vector Equilibrium: Polarization (2) →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium: Polarization:

"...There are two ways you can play this game, because time and again you find that in nesting work.. we are, for instance, taking six which would be in this position and you only nest three on it: so we use this nest: this nest: and this nest. We leave untouched, thos nests. They are in closest packing, we find, always alternate spaces that are not being used, so that triangular groups can be rotated into one position-- or 60 degrees to an alternate nestable place.

We get vector equilibrium in this condition; but in the other condition I have it rotating 60 degrees, and instead of being a vector equilibrium, we simply have in effect a polarized system. These are equilibriums going on in all directions and this goes into a polarized condition. Apparently all the organic chemistry is predicated on this polarized condition.

"We find that you can take two halves of the vector equilibrium made out of balls and take one half off it as vector equilibrium, rotate it 60 degrees and bring them together again and instead of having the condition you have in the vector equilibrium of alternate faces being squares and triangles in array around it,"

  • Cite Oregon Lecture #7, pp.234-235, 11 Jul'62

C20131

Vector Equilibrium: Polarization (2)

← Vector Equilibrium: Polarization (1) | Vector Equilibrium: Polarization Of →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium: Polarization:

"you will get a top triangle and a bottom triangle in the system by rotating it 60 degrees-- and then you will get a square and a square touching each other, and a triangle and a triangle, a square and a square.

"It is polarized. In other words you take the vector equilibrium, rotate it 60 degrees to the next nestable position and suddenly it is polarized. It is this polarized condition, then, that a section through-- it makes the famous chemical hex that the chemists have used. The chemists recognize that form but 10 or 15 years ago they didn't have an experience like that, but they did in the polarized system. Apparently then, all the chemical compounding in the organic chemistry relates to polarized systems."


C20132

Vector Equilibrium: Polarization Of

← Vector Equilibrium: Polarization (2) | Vector Equilibrium →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20133

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium: Polarization Of | VE as Prime Nonnucleated System →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium: Potential & Primitive Tetravolumes:

"When the isolated single sphere's vector equilibrium of

tetravolume 2½ is surrounded by 12 spheres to become a

nuclear sphere, the vector equilibrium described by the

innermost-economically-interconnecting of the centers of

volume of the 12 spheres comprehensively and tangentially

surrounding the nuclear sphere--as well as interconnecting

their 12 centers with the center of the nuclear sphere--

has a tetravolume of 20 and the nuclear group's rhombic

dodecahedron has a tetravolume of 24."

(Incorporated in SYNERGETICS 2 draft at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/1000-omnitopology#section-1033.1821033.182.)

  • Cite RBF marginalis at SYNERGETICS 2 draft at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/1000-omnitopology#section-1033.201033.20;

(draft of 19 Aug'76); RBF marginals done 12 May'77


C20134

VE as Prime Nonnucleated System

← Vector Equilibrium | VE as Prime Nucleated System →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20135

VE as Prime Nucleated System

← VE as Prime Nonnucleated System | Vector Equilibrium: Spheres & Spaces (1) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20136

Vector Equilibrium: Spheres & Spaces (1)

← VE as Prime Nucleated System | Vector Equilibrium: Spheres & Spaces (2) →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium: Spheres & Spaces:

"Spheres enclose the packing of the spaces between them. And the spaces turn into only two kinds: there is a concave vector equilibrium and a concave octahedron. Those are the two spaces.

"So I call the sphere a convex vector equilibrium and space a concave vector equilibrium: and an alternate one, which is the octahedron. So it is a precessional side shift. There are three alternates: so suddenly a space, a sphere, becomes a space and the space becomes a sphere. And I have a model where you can see it actually do that. You just press one energy action and the whole thing takes place and propagates an omnidirectional wave. You can literally see it-- drop a stone in the water and you can see an omnidirectional wave occurring... So the curves are generated and are not instantaneous. I have really the only instantaneous way of carrying on, where I don't have a curve generated by a hexagon: I simply have the hexagon, and its chords are equal to its radii.

"Physics has had only two kinds of acceleration: angular and linear. But it hasn't been able to coordinate the angular, so she uses only the liner and tries to experiment. So she hasn't been able to use the angular, so she uses only the linear and"


C20137

Vector Equilibrium: Spheres & Spaces (2)

← Vector Equilibrium: Spheres & Spaces (1) | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

"tries to experiment. So she hasn't been able to use the angular because it did involve this pi, so she throws in this constant to make up for it.

"And they have been going with analysis by 90-degree positionings of the actions; and nature doesn't make those 90 degrees... So my chords and my radii are the same and they are the angular and the linear accelerations. They are the vector zones."


C20138

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium: Spheres & Spaces (2) | Vector Equilibrium as Starting Point (1) →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium: Spheres and Spaces:

"A sphere is an asymmetrical phenomenon. It is an inward-outwardpulsative from the vector equilibrium. The sphere's spaces are interchangeable. The spaces between the spheres are complementaries. Our model really shows each sphere becoming a space and every space becoming a sphere. Each one can be either a concave or convex symmetry of the vector equilibrium. Vector equilibrium then having the maximum radius, then the radius contracts in order to be a sphere. That is how it can be accommodated within the total frame of reference. The edge of the vector equilibrium gets bent into becoming the arc of the sphere. So that the sphere of the vector equilibrium is contracted as a chord turns into an arc the radius contracts."

Cite RBF tape transcript, Chicago, Blackstone Hotel, to LJA + BO'R, p. 49, 31 May '71


C20139

Vector Equilibrium as Starting Point (1)

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium as Starting Point (2) →


Index Entry

"Being the zerophase of energy the vector equilibrium is inherently invisible and non-empirically-discoverable, which accounts for its having been for so long unrecognized as the spontaneous equilibrious model. As specialists scientists seek only for somethings. The vector equilibrium is the only model of nonbeing zero-inflection at the nonmoment of omniintertransformabilities where anything can happen and must happen single-atomically within and multiatomically without. Specializing science seeking only somethings inherently overlooked the nonthing vector equilibrium.

"The vector equilibrium is the most abstract of all the always-and-only abstract scientific generalization, for it is the heart of all interrelationships existing between and not in or of any of all the empirically apprehended intertransforms of the ever-and-everywhere intertransforming scenario Universe. The vector equilibrium is the zerophase, ergo inexpressible, interrelationship of all Universe events.

"The word vacuum relates specifically to gaseous phenomena. Nature's abhorrence of a vacuum induces physical relationships only in respect to the gaseous state. The vector equilibrium"


C20140

Vector Equilibrium as Starting Point (2)

← Vector Equilibrium as Starting Point (1) | Vector Equilibrium as Starting Point →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium as Starting Point:

"is the nothingness phase of all states of the physical Universe: it is the generalization of nothingness, within which generalization the absolute vacuum is a special case event in the gaseous state. The vector equilibrium is such a physically abhorred nonstate as to be the eternal self-starter, ergo the eternal re-self-starter ever regenerating the off-zero perturbations, oscillations, and all the wave propagation of all humanly experienceable physical and metaphysical phenomena.

"The sense-coordinating brain of each and all humans, like sound or light, has a limit speed of apprehending. There is no instant cerebral cognition. The apprehension lags automatically impose off-center human cognition which occasions the sense of time in a timeless eternity. The sense of time occasions the conception of life and serial experience. The inherently invisible vector equilibrium self-startered life and ever regenerates life. Inherent in the lags is our intimate knowledge only of self."

  • Cite SYNERGETICS, 2nd. Ed. Secs \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/400-system#section-440.11440.11-\hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/400-system#section-440.12440.12, 11 Sep'75

C20141

Vector Equilibrium as Starting Point

← Vector Equilibrium as Starting Point (2) | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium as Starting Point:

"It was the initial quality of seemingly invisible vector equilibrium-- as well as that it was not experimentally discoverable-- that has kept the vector equilibrium so long unrecognized as the equilibrium model.

"While the vector equilibrium is involved in all the forms of the crystals, the vector equilibrium is a starting point; it is not anything in its own right; it is the zero-inflection, nonmoment of omniintertransformabilities where anything can happen and must happen single-atomically within and multiatomically without."

  • Cite Vector equilibrium, 15 Oct'64 & 27 Nov'72 as rewritten by RBF, Wash. DC, 8 Apr'75

C20142

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium as Starting Point | Vector Equilibrium: Three-frequency VE →


Cross Reference

Vector Equilibrium: Symmetrical Contraction Of

Cross-References


C20143

Vector Equilibrium: Three-frequency VE

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium: Three-frequency VE:

"We have the total sphere as the first stage of radial contraction of the vector equilibrium. As its radii contract, its 24 chords respond to the lessening of space between the radii's outward ends by bowing or arcing either inwardly or outwardly of the system; if outwardly the arcs become convex and altogether produce or form a sphere; if inwardly they become concave and form or produce the space between the spheres.

"We have here some of the concepts of the limits of alternative asymmetric pulsative potential in respect to the vector equilibrium as the outward limit of nuclear phenomena beyond which vector equilibrium limits the first structural growth complexities are those of the crystals and molecules and thereafter the protoplasm and the biologicals.

"That's what we have: nuclear uniqueness and all its initial manifold transformative variables as they occur within the domain of the three-frequency vector equilibrium."


C20144

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium: Three-frequency VE | Vector Equilibrium: Three-frequency VE →


RBF Definitions

"We have the total sphere as the convergence of the vector equilibrium. And we have the concepts of the limits of asymmetry in respect to the vector equilibrium as the limit of coming to the molecules. That's what we have: nuclear uniqueness and all of its variables within the domain of the three-frequency vector equilibrium."

Citations

  1. RBF to EJA, 3200 Idaho, 16 Oct'72

C20145

Vector Equilibrium: Three-frequency VE

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium Threshold →


Cross Reference

Vector Equilibrium: Three-frequency VE:

Cross-References


C20146

Vector Equilibrium Threshold

← Vector Equilibrium: Three-frequency VE | Vector Equilibrium Threshold →


Index Entry

"Critical proximity is a threshold; the absolute threshold-- a vector equilibrium threshold. If it persists, we call it 'matter,'"


C20147

Vector Equilibrium Threshold

← Vector Equilibrium Threshold | Vector Equilibrium: Unarticulated VE →


Cross Reference

Vector Equilibrium Threshold:

Cross-References


C20148

Vector Equilibrium: Unarticulated VE

← Vector Equilibrium Threshold | Vector Equilibrium Unarticulated VE →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium: Unarticulated VE:

"Wavelength times frequency is the speed of all radiation. If the frequency of the vector equilibrium is four, its vector radius, or basic wavelength = 186,000/4 miles reachable within one second= 46,500 reach-miles. Electromagnetically speaking, the unarticulated vector equilibrium's one-second vector length is always 186,\hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/200-synergetics#section-282.396282.396 miles.

"We multiply our frequency by the number of times we divide he vector of the vector equilibrium, and that gives c²; our reachable points in Universe will multiply at a rate of F² x 10 + 2."


C20149

Vector Equilibrium Unarticulated VE

← Vector Equilibrium: Unarticulated VE | Vector Equilibrium as Unity →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20150

Vector Equilibrium as Unity

← Vector Equilibrium Unarticulated VE | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium as Unity:

"The maximum space employed by unity is the vector equilibrium."

  • Cite RBF at Penn Bell Videotaping session, Philadelphia, PA., 20 Jan'75

C20151

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium as Unity | Vector Equilibrium Zero Condition →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium: Ratio of Volume to Quantum:

"To stabilize the vector equilibrium structurally we need to insert six vectors as dia,onals in each of its quadrangular square faces, which converts the six vector-edged squares into six vector-diagonalled diamonds, but in doing so shrinks the vector equilibrium's 20 units of enclosed volume to 18.51 units of volume. (I.e., 3.702 vol : 1 quantum.)


C20152

Vector Equilibrium Zero Condition

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium Zerophase →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium Zero Condition:

"We have said that this is a vector equilibrium and in a

zero condition and is nonreality. Nature would not permit

it but a minute after that these six edges turbine around

that point one way or another and you see plenty of the

models of the lines trubining around. We will have to say

that there had to be a moment theoretically when this plane

went from being a positive tetrahedron to a negative

tetrahedron, which it could be, and had theoretically to

pass through that point."

  • Cite Oregon Lecture #7, p. 237, July '62

C20153

Vector Equilibrium Zerophase

← Vector Equilibrium Zero Condition | Vector Equilibrium: Zerophase →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium Zerophase:

"When the four planes of each of the eight tetrahedra move toward their four opposite vertexes the momentum carries them through zero-volume nothingness of the vector equilibrium phase. All their volumes decrease at a third-power rate of their linear rate of approach. As the four tetrahedral planes coincide, the four great circle planes of the vector equilibrium all go through the same nothingness local at the same time. Thus we find the vector equilibrium to be the inherent zero-nineness of fundamental number behavior."

(s1013.42)

  • Cite SYNERGETICS, 2nd. Ed. at RBF margunals at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/1000-omnitopology#section-1013.421013.42; 30 Aug'75

C20154

Vector Equilibrium: Zerophase

← Vector Equilibrium Zerophase | Vector Equilibrium: Zerophase →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium: Zerophase:

"Pulsation, the vector equilibrium is the nearest thing

we will ever know to eternity and God: the zerophase of

conceptual integrity inherent in the positive and negative

asymmetries which propagate the problems of the

consciousness. Our inherently limited perceptivity which

requires these definitions of the asymmetric emphasis of

experience. Experience is inherently terminal, partial,

differentiable. . . the antithesis of eternal integrity."

  • Citation at Experience, 12 Sep'71

  • Cite RBF to EJA, Beverly Hotel, New York, 12 Sept 1971.


C20155

Vector Equilibrium: Zerophase

← Vector Equilibrium: Zerophase | Vector Equilibrium →


Index Entry

Vector equilibrium is all the things any one tetrahedron could do by pumping (turning itself inside out). It has four directions it could turn inside out. So it does all four of them to a common center and makes eight tetrahedra. So this is a tetrahedron exploding itself: turning itself inside out in four possible directions. So we get eight: inside and outside in four directions. The vector equilibrium is all the potentials. This is the way you become invisible.


C20156

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium: Zerophase | Vector Equilibrium Zerophase →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium: Zerophase:

"The vector equilibrium is absolutely dead center of Universe and will never be seen by man in any physical experience-- yet it is the frame of reference. And it is not in rotation and it is sizeless and timeless. . . We have its mathematics which deals absolutely discretely because it does shut mm off in those chordal lengths. The radial vectors and circumferential vectors are absolutely the same size so I don't have to think about pi. She is able to entertain the pi in a rational system."

  • Cite tape transcript RBF to BO'R, CarbondaleDome, 1 May 1971. pp. 39-40.

C20157

Vector Equilibrium Zerophase

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium: Zerophase →


RBF Definitions

But the point is the vector equilibrium simply gives you the key. . . . All four planes of all eight tetrahedra are in common centers. Yet you see only four. Both the positive and the negative phase of the tetrahedra are in congruence in the center. And they are able to do this because they are discontinuous. Their centers -- literally, they are the first time you ever saw an absolutely empty thing. All four planes go through the same center. And you can only do that when there is nothingness."


C20158

Vector Equilibrium: Zerophase

← Vector Equilibrium Zerophase | Vector Equilibrium: Zerophase: Zerosize (1) →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium: Zerophase:

"I have a vigorous conviction that all the phenomena larger and more complex than vector equilibrium do relate to chemical compounds and anything smaller than vector equilibrium relates to the single atoms which do get into the symmetries whereas the chemical compounds get into a polarized system. The vector equilibrium is a condition that nature never allows herself to be caught in. We do not find the vector equilibrium occuring per se as a crystal in universe. We have vector equilibriums mildly distorted as nature goes positive and negative in respect to the equilibrium and everything that we know as reality has to be either a positive or a negative condition. She does not get caught at the zero because vector equilibrium is really a zero."

  • Cite Carbondale-Draft

Nature's Coordination, p. VI.43

  • Cite OKCOSW #1, p. 235, 11 Jul'62

VE AS ZERO MODEL - Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/400-system#section-432.03432.03


C20159

Vector Equilibrium: Zerophase: Zerosize (1)

← Vector Equilibrium: Zerophase | Vector Equilibrium Zerophase Zerosize (2) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References

  • Tetrahedron: Inside-outing Of Congruence at the Center Hedra

C20160

Vector Equilibrium Zerophase Zerosize (2)

← Vector Equilibrium: Zerophase: Zerosize (1) | Vector Equilibrium: Zerosize →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20161

Vector Equilibrium: Zerosize

← Vector Equilibrium Zerophase Zerosize (2) | Vector Equilibrium: Zero Tetrahedron →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium: Zerosize:

"The relative size of the vector equilibrium begins with the initial zerosize integrity of conceptuality and its omnidimensional modular subdivisibility for accounting any frequency of geometrical configuration transformative accounting."

  • Cite RBF rewrite of SYNERGETICS galley at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/400-system#section-445.07445.07, 4 Nov'73

C20162

Vector Equilibrium: Zero Tetrahedron

← Vector Equilibrium: Zerosize | Vector Equilibrium: Zero Tetrahedron →


Index Entry

"Vector equilibrium accommodates all the intertransformings of any one tetrahedron by polar pumping or turning itself inside out. Each vector equilibrium has four directions in which it can turn itself inside out. It uses all four of them through the vector equilibrium's common center and generates eight tetrahedra. The vector equilibrium is a complex tetrahedron imploding-exploding itself, turning itself inside out in four possible directions. So we get eight: inside and outside in four directions. The vector equilibrium is all eight of the potentials." - Cite RBF rewrite of SYNERGETICS galley at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/400-system#section-441.02441.02, 4 Nov'73


C20163

Vector Equilibrium: Zero Tetrahedron

← Vector Equilibrium: Zero Tetrahedron | Vector Equilibrium: Zero Tetrahedron (1) →


Index Entry

"All four planes of all eight tetrahedra, i.e., 32 planes in all, are congruent with the four visible planes passing through their common vector equilibrium center. So you see only four planes. Both the positive and negative phase of the eight vector equilibrium tetrahedra are in congruence in the center. They are able to do this because they are synchronously discontinuous. Their common center provides the local of an absolutely empty event."


C20164

Vector Equilibrium: Zero Tetrahedron (1)

← Vector Equilibrium: Zero Tetrahedron | Vector Equilibrium: Zero Tetrahedron (2) →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium: Zero Tetrahedron:

"There is something I would like to speak about in regard to vector equilibrium and tetrahedron. I spoke yesterday about a rather extraordinary realization that in looking at a tetrahedron we say, I see there are three around any one vertex: there are three faces and three edges in beautiful synchronization and we say that all looks simple and logical. Then we find it rather surprising because we find that the inventory of three faces came out of an inventory of four total that are available in the tetrahedron. And the inventory of three edges came out of an inventory of six that are available. So that the sixness and fourness were very different inventories. Somehow around any one vertex nature had arranged to put them in neat balance of different inventories.

"Consider the case I spoke of one time of the cheese tetrahedron as pushing one of the faces towards the opposite vertex. I am not going to talk about it as a cheese now, but for a moment we will think of it just as a plane. As the top plane of this tetrahedron-- I am going to move it (the plane) towards this opposite vertex. Finally I move it until it is congruent with"


C20165

Vector Equilibrium: Zero Tetrahedron (2)

← Vector Equilibrium: Zero Tetrahedron (1) | Vector Equilibrium: Zero Tetrahedron (3) →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium: Zero Tetrahedron:

"the opposite vertex. There is now no volume, but we have agreed that the conditions of symmetry in the tetrahedron, the sixness and fourness, are all still there, but they are empty.

"Now with this plane congruent with the opposite vertex we have a very interesting condition. We have all four planes of the tetrahedron going through the same point at the same time-- or, theoretically, as close as you can ever get. You have six edges going through the same point at the same time. We have agreed that this is a condition that can never happen in reality, but in the vector equilibrium-- where it has no size-- we have the only possible time when this would seem to occur.

"So we now have all six edges and a total inventory of four faces and six edges all going through the same theoretical point at the same moment. We have said that this is a vector equilibrium and in a zero condition and is nonreality. Nature would not permit it. But a minute after that, those six edges turbine around the point one way or another-- and you see plenty of models of the lines turbining around-- but we will have to say that there had to be a moment theoretically when this plane"


C20166

Vector Equilibrium: Zero Tetrahedron (3)

← Vector Equilibrium: Zero Tetrahedron (2) | Vector Equilibrium (1) →


Index Entry

Vector Equilibrium: Zero Tetrahedron:

"went from being a positive tetrahedron to a negative tetrahedron, which it could be, and had theoretically to pass through that point. Very clearly vector equilibrium is a zero tetrahedron: and we already had tetrahedron as an indestructible conceivable phenomenon independent of size. An d then we have it getting into its own true zero vector equilibrium. It is very interesting to realize what that condition is. It is a condition that nature apparently does not permit in our life, but what we call reality is always a positive and negative set of the whole."


C20167

Vector Equilibrium (1)

← Vector Equilibrium: Zero Tetrahedron (3) | Vector Equilibrium (1) →


Cross Reference

See Allspace Filling:ahedron & VE, Oct

Between: VE as Prime Betweenness Model

Domain of VE

Equilibrium Model

Fourth Dimension: VE as Fourth-dimension Model

Genesis of Modelability = VE

Cross-References


C20168

Vector Equilibrium (1)

← Vector Equilibrium (1) | Vector Equilibrium (1) →


Cross Reference

Negative VE

Potential VE

Propagative Transformation of VE

Stabilized VE

Star Tetra & VE

Spontaneous Equilibrrious Model

Transvector-equilibrium

Tensegrity VE

Cross-References


C20169

Vector Equilibrium (1)

← Vector Equilibrium (1) | Vector Equilibrium →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20170

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium (1) | Vector Equilibrium (2) →


Cross Reference

Everwhen, 18 Nov'77

Cross-References


C20171

Vector Equilibrium (2)

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20172

Vector Equilibrium

← Vector Equilibrium (2) | Vector Equilibrium (3A) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20173

Vector Equilibrium (3A)

← Vector Equilibrium | Vector Equilibrium (3B) →


Cross Reference

VE: Eight-pointed Star System, 3A

VE as Empty Set Tetrahedron, 3A

VE: Field of Energy, 3A

VE Field, 3A

VE: Eight New Nuclei at Fifth Frequency, 3A

VE Frame, 3A

VE: Frequency Of, 3A

VE: Great Circles Of, 3A

VE Frame, 3A

VE Growth, 3A

VE: Integral Negative, 3A

VE Involvement Domain, 3A

VE: Lending & Borrowing Model, 3A

VE: Odd or Even Shell Growth, 3A

VE Package, 3A

VE: Propagative Transformation Of, 3A

VE Phase, 3A

VE: Polarization, 3A

Cross-References


C20174

Vector Equilibrium (3B)

← Vector Equilibrium (3A) | Vegetable Crop Harvesting →


Cross Reference

VE as Starting Point

VE: Spheres & Spaces

VE: Symmetrical Contraction Of

VE: Three-frequency

VE: Unarticulated VE

VE as Unity

VE: Zerophase

VE: Zerosize

VE: Zero Tetrahedron

VE &a, Oct

VE: Axes

VE: Potential & Primitive Tetravolumes

Cross-References


C20175

Vegetable Crop Harvesting

← Vector Equilibrium (3B) | Vegetable Crop Harvesting →


Index Entry

Vegetable Crop Harvesting:

"Now let's look at the present situation in agriculture where the basic food production is. Of the total vegetable crop harvesting about 10 percent is actually, finally available for human consumption in America. There are various reasons for this, but it is if you were sort of standing and picking apples, and for every nine apples that you pick, you only get■ one in your basket. It's a very frustrating, inefficient process."

Cite RBF to World Game at NY Studio School 12Jun-31Jul'69, from Saturn Film transcript, Sound 1, Take 1, pp.16-17.


C20176

Vegetable Crop Harvesting

← Vegetable Crop Harvesting | Vegetables →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20177

Vegetables

← Vegetable Crop Harvesting | Vegetation →


Cross Reference

Vegetables:

Cross-References


C20178

Vegetation

← Vegetables | Vegetation (1) →


Index Entry

Vegetation:

"... The vegetation's terrestrial impoundments of the star-radiated energy which alone regenerates all biological life around Earth planet..."


C20179

Vegetation (1)

← Vegetation | Vegetation (2) →


Cross Reference

Impoundment

Cross-References


C20180

Vegetation (2)

← Vegetation (1) | Vehicle →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20181

Vehicle

← Vegetation (2) | Velocity →


Cross Reference

Vehicle:

Cross-References


C20182

Velocity

← Vehicle | Velocity →


RBF Definitions

Velocity can be inward, outward, or around, and the arounding will always be chordal and exactly equated with the inwardness and outwardness time expendibilities." - Cite SYNERGETICS draft at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/900-modelability#section-962.43962.43, 17 Nov'72


C20183

Velocity

← Velocity | Velocity →


Index Entry

... Vectors, being the product of physical energy constituents, are 'real,' having velocity multiplied by mass operating in a specific direction; velocity being a product of time and size modules; and mass being a volume-weight relationship.


C20184

Velocity

← Velocity | Velocity →


Index Entry

Time is in our dimensioning because our geometry is vectorial. Every vector = mass x velocity, and time is a function of velocity.

Cite RBF to Ed, 3200 Idaho, Washington DC, 21 Dec. 71.

Citation & context at Vector, 21 Dec'71.


C20185

Velocity

← Velocity | Velocity →


Index Entry

Velocity:

"The physical expands and increases its velocities to cope with the greater and greater distances. However, there seems to be a constancy of top velocity and it was this that so impressed Einstein. All the various types of radiation, the ultraviolet, the radio wave and the x-ray reach about 186,000 miles per second."

  • Cite RBF Preface for Francis WA:EAHK, p. 3, Undated

  • Citation and context at Eternal Slowdown (1), 1970


C20186

Velocity

← Velocity | Velocity →


Index Entry

Vectors are real experiences and they have inherent velocity and mass. Velocity is the complementarity of time and space. Time and space are simply functions of velocity. Velocity is really the reality. You can examine the time or the space increment, but they are never independent of one another. They are unified as velocity.


C20187

Velocity

← Velocity | Velocity →


Index Entry

Velocity:

".... As we find out in Electromagnetics there are domains of actions and these molecules want certain sizes and when you pressure too many of these patterns into the same area there is not enough room so they develop a very high speed and speed makes up for the crowding."

  • Citation and context at Domain of Action, 9 Jul'62

  • Cite Oregon Lecture #5, p. 186, 9 Jul'62


C20188

Velocity

← Velocity | Velocity →


RBF Definitions

"The higher the velocity the lesser the possibility

of interference in any one local."

Citations

  1. OREGON Lecture #5 - p. 187, 9 Jul'62

C20189

Velocity

← Velocity | Velocity (1) →


Index Entry

Velocity:

"Velocity gives us what we call pressure or heat, it can be read either way."

  • Cite OREGON Lecture #5 - p. 187, 9 Jul'62

C20190

Velocity (1)

← Velocity | Velocity (2) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20191

Velocity (2)

← Velocity (1) | Venice Venetian →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20192

Venice Venetian

← Velocity (2) | Ventilated Prose →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20193

Ventilated Prose

← Venice Venetian | Ventilated →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20194

Ventilated

← Ventilated Prose | Venus Proximity →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20195

Venus Proximity

← Ventilated | Verbs →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20196

Verbs

← Venus Proximity | Verb →


Index Entry

Verbs:

"There is no verb for eternity. Verbs are always special case."

  • Cite RBF to EJA, 3200 Idaho, Wash, DC; 12 Nov'75

C20197

Verb

← Verbs | Verbs →


Index Entry

Verb:

"Architecture, like music, will be a verb and not a noun."

  • Citation and context at (F), Aug'72 Invisible Architecture:

C20198

Verbs

← Verb | Verbs →


Index Entry

Verbs:

"Physics has not found any things. It has only found energy events that are continually transforming. Only verbs are applicable. There are no nouns because there are no things."

  • Cite RBF to EJA, Mayflower Hotel, 1969.

C20199

Verbs

← Verbs | Verb: I Seem to Be a Verb →


Index Entry

"There are no nouns, for physics has found no things (static, solid phenomena)-- ergo there are only verbs."

  • Cite DOXIADIS, p. 308 , 20 Jun'66

C20200

Verb: I Seem to Be a Verb

← Verbs | Verbs: I Seem to be a Verb →


Index Entry

Q. "What are you? . . . What is it that you do?"

RBF: Jarling, I don't know any other way to answer you except to say that I once wrote a book called 'I Seem to Be a Verb.' . . . . I don't like labels. . . . I don't profess myself.


C20201

Verbs: I Seem to be a Verb

← Verb: I Seem to Be a Verb | Verb: I Seem To Be a Verb →


Index Entry

Verbs: I Seem to be a Verb:

"I know that I am not a category, a hybrid specialization,

I am not a thing-- a noun.

I seem to be a verb--

an evolutionary process--

an integral function of the Universe,

and so are you."

R.B.F.

  • Cite Frontispiece to THE BUCKMINSTER FULLER READER, Ed. James Keller, J. Cape, 1970.

C20202

Verb: I Seem To Be a Verb

← Verbs: I Seem to be a Verb | Verb →


RBF Definitions

"Where do you live? And: What are you? are progressively less sensible questions. As of now I am a passenger on Spaceship Earth. I don't know what I am. I know I am not a category hybrid specialization. I am not a thing, a noun. You and I seem to be verbs in evolutionary process. Are we not integral functions of the Universe?"

  • Citation & context at Acceleration of Change,(1), 16 Aug'70

C20203

Verb

← Verb: I Seem To Be a Verb | Verb vs. Noun →


Index Entry

I Seem To Be A Verb:

"I live on Earth at present,

And I don't know what I am.

I know that I am not a category.

I am not a thing-- a noun.

I seem to be a verb,

An evolutionary process--

An integral function of the Universe."


C20204

Verb vs. Noun

← Verb | Verb vs. Noun →


Index Entry

Verb vs. Noun:

"Nouns can be at the same time, but verbs cannot."

  • Citation & context at Overlapping, 30 may'75

C20205

Verb vs. Noun

← Verb vs. Noun | Verbs: Verbing →


Cross Reference

See Quick & the Dead: Song Of, Oct'66

Cross-References

  • Quick \& the Dead: Song Of, Oct'66
  • Overlapping, 30 May'75*

C20206

Verbs: Verbing

← Verb vs. Noun | Verbs →


Index Entry

Verbs: Verbing:

"... There are no 'absolutes'

-- No 'ends' in themselves-- no 'things'--

Only transitionally transformative verbing."

  • Cite How Little, p. 52. Oct'66

C20207

Verbs

← Verbs: Verbing | Verbs: No 'Where's, No 'What's, Only 'When's →


Index Entry

Verbs: No 'Where's, No 'What's, Only 'When's:

"Because physics has found no continuums, no experimental solids, no things, no real matter, I had decided half a century ago to identify mathematical behaviors of energy phenomena only as events. If there are no things, there are no nouns of material substance. The old semantics permitted common-sense acceptance of such a sentence as , 'A man pounds the table,' wherein a noun verbs a noun or a subject verbs a predicate. I found it necessary to change this form to a complex of events identified as me, which must be identified as a verb. The complex verb me observed another complex of events identified again ignorantly as a 'table.' I disciplined myself to communicate exclusively with verbs. There are no wheres and whats, only angle and frequency events described as whens."


C20208

Verbs: No 'Where's, No 'What's, Only 'When's

← Verbs | Inventory of Verbs →


Index Entry

Verbs: No 'Where's, No 'What's, Only 'When's:

"because physics has found no continuums, no experimental solids, no things, no real matter, I had decided half a century ago to identify mathematical behaviors of energy phenomena only as events. If there are no things, there are no nouns of material substance. The old semantics which permitted common-sense acceptance of such a sentence as 'A man pounds the table,' wherein a noun verbs a noun or a subject verbs a predicate. I found it necessary to change this form to a complex of events identified as 'I,'. 'He' must be identified as a verb and that/the complex verb 'He' observed another event complex ignorantly called a 'man,' which event complex developed as a complex interference pattern with another complex of events identified again ignorantly as a 'table.' I disciplined myself to communicate exclusively with verbs. There are no where's and what's; only angle and frequency events described as when's."

  • hBf Marginalia on SYNERGETICS draft at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/200-synergetics#section-250.04250.04, Dec '71, at 3200 Idaho, Washington DC, 26 Jan '72. Incorporate at SYNERGETICS Sec250.32, 11 Oct'72

C20209

Inventory of Verbs

← Verbs: No 'Where's, No 'What's, Only 'When's | Verb (1) →


Cross Reference

Verbs: Inventory of Verbs: See Verb: I Seem to Be a Verb God as a Verb Mind as Verb Einstein is a Verb Universe: The Great Verb 'Universe' Meaning as a Dynamic Patterning Verb

God as a Verb

Universe: The Great Verb 'Universe'

Meaning as a Dynamic Patterning Verb

Cross-References


C20210

Verb (1)

← Inventory of Verbs | Verb Verbal Verbing (2) →


Cross Reference

Intellecting

Universe: The Great Verb Universe

Cross-References


C20211

Verb Verbal Verbing (2)

← Verb (1) | Verify →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20212

Verify

← Verb Verbal Verbing (2) | Veritas →


Cross Reference

Verify:

Cross-References

  • Reverifiable

C20213

Veritas

← Verify | Verity →


Index Entry

Veritas:

"I might have answered your letter in a much more poetical way by quoting only the motto of 340-year-old Harvard University: 'Veritas'-- (Vere-i-tas)--controlling the veering of one's course, V = two alternate angular directions. Veritas-- it will never be superseded."

  • Cite RBF Ltr. to Bro. Jos. Chuala., p.5; 7 Nov'75

C20214

Verity

← Veritas | Verity →


Index Entry

Verity:

"Verities are generalized principles stated in semimetaphorical terms. Verities are differentiable."

  • Citation and context at Truth, 29 Dec'73

C20215

Verity

← Verity | Verity Verities (1) →


Index Entry

Verity:

"Verities are semi-special-case."

  • Citation and context at Truth, 29 Dec'73

C20216

Verity Verities (1)

← Verity | Verity Veritas (2) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20217

Verity Veritas (2)

← Verity Verities (1) | Verse vs. Prose →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20218

Verse vs. Prose

← Verity Veritas (2) | Versus: Checklist (1) →


Index Entry

The difference between verse and prose is the difference between converging-diverging and parallelism.

Verse, ver-se is con-ver-gent-di-ver-gent ver-bing....

veering, ver-ing... the way waves and music pulsatingly veer

in Uni-verse, Uni-ver-se... ver, vers (toward), ver-i-tas (truth

Prose is parallel. P-prose is P-parallel... pursuit.

Prose is stratified and Prose is prone, ponderous.

∂ = bias symbol. P = 1 + ∂ . B is |∂ . B is Biased.

P = | + ∂ = |: + ∂ = |e ∂ the story.

Citr RBF holograph, 11 Dec'75


C20219

Versus: Checklist (1)

← Verse vs. Prose | Versus (A2) →


Cross Reference

*indexed under other formulation

All-motion Universe vs. Instant Universe**

Articulating vs. Observing**

Agricultural Accounting vs. Industrial**

Attraction vs. Push**

Artillery Wheel vs. Wire Wheel**

Active vs. Potential**

Automatics vs. Intellections

Asymmetry: Balanced vs. Unbalanced

Aberration vs. Principle**

Accounting: Triangular vs. Quadrangular**

Airspace Technology vs. Walls**

Admission vs. Omission**

Cross-References


C20220

Versus (A2)

← Versus: Checklist (1) | Versus: Checklist →


Cross Reference

Versus: Checklist:

*Indexed under other formulation

Cross-References


C20221

Versus: Checklist

← Versus (A2) | Versus: Checklist (1) →


Cross Reference

Believe vs. Guess**

Blossoms vs. Roots**

Beams vs. Columns**

Broadcasting vs. Incasting**

Boundaries vs Nucleus**

Bone vs. Cartilage**

Big Bang Theory vs. Scenario Universe**

Cross-References


C20222

Versus: Checklist (1)

← Versus: Checklist | Versus: Checklist (2) →


Cross Reference

  • indexed under other formulation

Complex vs. Elementary*

Computers vs. Humans: Feedback Comprehensivity*

Comprehensive vs. Local*

Corporeal vs. Living: Morphology*

Coils vs. Knots: Rope*

Constant vs. Time*

Commonwealth: Appreciative vs. Depreciative*

Colonialism vs. Transnationalism*

Contracting Metaphysical Universe vs. Expanding Physical Universe*

Conceptual vs. Qualitative

Conceptuality vs. Space*

Centralize vs.entralize, Dec*

Cross-References


C20223

Versus: Checklist (2)

← Versus: Checklist (1) | Versus: Checklist (3) →


Cross Reference

  • Indexed under other formulation

See Community vs. Privacy, (2)*

Cold Valve of Time vs. Hot Valve of Energy, (2)

Consistency vs. Learning, (2)*

Circumferential Tension vs. Radial Compression, (2)*

Cure vs. Mend, (2)*

Curved vs. Flat, (2)*

Catenary vs. Suspension, (2)*

Chaos vs. Design, (2)*

Crystal vs. Radiation Model, (2)*

Conceptual Tetrahedron vs. Physical Tetrahedron, (2)*

Cross-References


C20224

Versus: Checklist (3)

← Versus: Checklist (2) | Versus: Checklist (1) →


Cross Reference

  • indexed under other formulation

Complex vs. Unity

Critical Path vs. Orbital Feedback Circuitry*

Cross-References


C20225

Versus: Checklist (1)

← Versus: Checklist (3) | Versus: Checklist (2) →


Cross Reference

  • indexed under other formulation

Discovery vs. Invention**

Depreciative vs. Appreciative Commonwealth**

Direct vs. Indirect: Acceleration**

Differentiated Proclivities vs. Synergetic Proclivities**

Discovery vs. Creation**

Death: Slow Death by Slums vs War as Quick Death

Darwin's Determinism vs. Free Will

Distribute vs. Inhibit**

Dust vs. Stone**

Cross-References


C20226

Versus: Checklist (2)

← Versus: Checklist (1) | Versus Checklist (1) →


Cross Reference

  • Indexed under other formulation

Cross-References


C20227

Versus Checklist (1)

← Versus: Checklist (2) | Versus: Checklist (2) →


Cross Reference

  • indexed under other formulation

Energetic vs. Abstract**

Einstein vs. Newton**

Effects: Primary vs. Side**

Ego vs. Omniscience

Emergency vs. Spontaneous: Teleology**

Entropy vs. Information**

Emergency vs. Freedom**

Cross-References


C20228

Versus: Checklist (2)

← Versus Checklist (1) | Versus: Checklist →


Cross Reference

  • Indexed under other formulation

Extraversion vs. Introversion*

Energy vs. Time*

Error: Inward vs. Outward Dismissal Of*

Evolution vs. Familiarity*

Energy vs. Mind*

Exponential vs. Experimental

Electricity vs. Visible Light*

Engineer vs. Sculptor*

Energism vs. Synergism*

Cross-References


C20229

Versus: Checklist

← Versus: Checklist (2) | Versus: Checklist →


Cross Reference

  • indexed under other formulation

Finite vs. Eternal*

Faster & Far Apart vs. Slower & Closer*

Finity vs. Infinity*

Face vs. Vertex*

Freedom vs. Emergency*

Form vs. Model*

Frequency vs. Primitive*

Cross-References


C20230

Versus: Checklist

← Versus: Checklist | Versus: Checklist →


Cross Reference

  • indexed under other formulation

Generalization vs. Design*

Graphics vs. Words: Slides*

Generalization vs. Reality*

Global Political Revolution vs. Design Science Revolution

Cross-References


C20231

Versus: Checklist

← Versus: Checklist | Versus: Checklist (1) →


Cross Reference

  • indexed undero other formulation

Humans vs. Computers: Feedback Comprehensivity**

Humanity vs. Man**

Hearing vs. Seeing**

Happenstance vs. Design**

Humans vs. Trees**

Humans' Technology vs. Nature's Technology**

Cross-References


C20232

Versus: Checklist (1)

← Versus: Checklist | Versus: Checklist (2) →


Cross Reference

  • indexed under other formulation

Inventions vs. Discovery

Intellections vs. Automatics*

Integrity vs. Experience*

Indirect vs. Direct: Acceleration*

Infinite Series vs. Minimum Limit*

Inflexible vs Flexible*

Cross-References


C20233

Versus: Checklist (2)

← Versus: Checklist (1) | Versus: Checklist →


Cross Reference

  • Indexed under other formulation

Interference vs. Avoidance, (12)

Information vs. Concept, (12)*

Integer vs. Pattern, (12)*

Invisible Electrodynamics vs. Visible Thermodynamics, (12)*

Instrument vs. Service, (12)*

Inside-out vs. Outside-out, (12)*

Immobile Purchasing vs. Mobile Rentability, (12)*

Cross-References


C20234

Versus: Checklist

← Versus: Checklist (2) | Versus: Checklist →


Cross Reference

Kinetic vs. Dynamic*

Cross-References


C20235

Versus: Checklist

← Versus: Checklist | Versus: Checklist (1) →


Cross Reference

  • indexed under other formulation

Linear vs. Omnimbracing

Limits to Growth vs. Exponential Model*

Literary vs. Mathematical: Generalizations*

Living vs. Corporeal: Morphology*

Limited vs. Unlimited*

Lever vs. Coherence*

Local Pattern vs. World Pattern*

Light vs. Electricity*

Cross-References


C20236

Versus: Checklist (1)

← Versus: Checklist | Versus Checklist →


Cross Reference

  • indexed under other formulation

Manifest vs. Potential*

Man: Big vs. Little*

Mind's Intellecutions vs. Brain's Automatics*

Mathematical vs. Literary: Generalizations*

Model: Pendulum vs. Scenario*

Model vs. Synergetics*

Mutual Emergency vs. Individual Freedom*

Medium vs. Body*

Multiatomic vs. Single Atomic*

Cross-References


C20237

Versus Checklist

← Versus: Checklist (1) | Versus: Checklist →


Cross Reference

Man vs. Machines

Cross-References


C20238

Versus: Checklist

← Versus Checklist | Versus Checklist →


Cross Reference

  • indexed under other formulation

Nonbiologicals vs. Biologicals**

Noun vs. Verb**

Ninety Degreeness vs. Sixty Degreeness**

Nonuse vs. Use

Nuclear Domain vs. Spheric Domain**

Ninety Degreeness vs 180-degreeness

Names vs. Interrelatedness**

Nature's Technology vs. Humana' Technology

Cross-References


C20239

Versus Checklist

← Versus: Checklist | Versus: Checklist (1) →


Cross Reference

  • indexed under other formulation

Operationally Effective vs. Potential**

Operative vs. Potential**

Outdoors vs. Indoors**

Omniembracing vs. Linear**

Orbital vs. Linear**

Orbital vs. Radial**

Omnidirectional vs. Polarization

Omnidirectional vs. Inwardness**

Outward vs. Inward Dismissal of Error **

Omnidirectional vs. Linear**

Cross-References


C20240

Versus: Checklist (1)

← Versus Checklist | Versus Checklist (2) →


Cross Reference

Political Revolution vs. Design Revolution*

Physical vs. Structural

Primary vs. Side Effects

Process vs. Thing

Process vs. Thing

Politics vs. World Game

Push vs. Attraction

Potential vs. Physically Realized

Pure Science Events vs. Inventions*

Principle vs. Resource*

Particle vs. Wave*

Precession vs. Synergy*

Positives vs. Low Pressure*

Pushive vs. Tensive

Proclivities: Synergetic Differentiated vs. Synergetic

Permeating vs. Omniembracing*

Polarization vs. Omnidirectionality*

Pathology: Preventive vs. Curative

  • indexed under other formulation

Cross-References


C20241

Versus Checklist (2)

← Versus: Checklist (1) | Versus: Checklist (3) →


Cross Reference

*Indexed under other formulation

Probability vs. Navigation**

Principle vs. Fantasy**

Physical Accounting vs. Know-how Accounting

Probability vs. Discrete**

Precession vs. Modulation**

Parallel vs. Convergent**

Prose vs. Verse**

Physical vs. Constant**

Prime Volume vs. System**

Cross-References


C20242

Versus: Checklist (3)

← Versus Checklist (2) | Versus →


Cross Reference

*Indexed under other formulation

Photograph vs. Model*

Popular Reality vs. Fuller's Reality*

Cross-References


C20243

Versus

← Versus: Checklist (3) | Versus Checklist →


Cross Reference

Versus: Checklist: (Potentials)

Cross-References


C20244

Versus Checklist

← Versus | Versus (1) →


Cross Reference

Versus: Checklist:

(Q)

  • indexed under other formulation

Quantitative vs. Conceptual*

Quadrangular Accounting vs. Triangular Accounting*

Quanta: Structural vs. Volumetric*

Cross-References


C20245

Versus (1)

← Versus Checklist | Versus Checklist (2) →


Cross Reference

  • Indexed under other formulation

Radiant vs. Potential**

Radius vs. Edge**

Radiation vs. Matter**

Reforms vs. New Forms**

Round Trip vs. One Way**

Reflexes vs. Structure**

Radiation vs. Intellect**

Radial Infinite vs. Circumferential Finite**

Reflex vs. Mind**

Resolution vs. Abstraction**

Radiation vs. Concentration**

Cross-References


C20246

Versus Checklist (2)

← Versus (1) | Versus Checklist (1) →


Cross Reference

  • Indexed under other formulation

Research vs. Search*

Recognition vs. Cognition*

Radiant vs. Convergent*

Railroads vs. Airplanes*

Reasoning vs. Knowing*

Cross-References


C20247

Versus Checklist (1)

← Versus Checklist (2) | Versus: Checklist (2) →


Cross Reference

  • indexed under other formulation

Synergy vs. Precession

Spontaneous vs. Emergency: Teleology**

Speech vs. Vision**

Solid vs. Liquid**

Structure vs. Geodesics**

Space vs. Thinkability**

Shortest vs. Most Economical**

Side Effects vs. Primary**

Structural vs. Physical**

Scenario Model vs. Pendulum Model**

Serious Side vs. Light Side of any Question**

Structure vs. Free Energy**

Sensorial vs. Abstract**

Synergy vs. Annihilation**

Static Word vs. Behaviorist Word**

Stable vs. Dynamic**

Synergetics vs. Euler**

Cross-References


C20248

Versus: Checklist (2)

← Versus Checklist (1) | Versus: Checklist (3) →


Cross Reference

  • Indexed under other formulation

Synergetic Proclivities vs. Differentiated Proclivities**

Static vs. Dynamic

Surprise vs. Improvement**

Search vs. Research

Settlements vs. Unsettling**

Structures vs. Machines

Cross-References


C20249

Versus: Checklist (3)

← Versus: Checklist (2) | Versus (1) →


Cross Reference

*Indexed under other formulation

Stone vs. Dust, (S3)

Superficial vs. Nuclear*, (S3)*

Scenario vs. Model*, (S3)*

Structure vs. Mechanics, (S3)

Surface vs. Realms*, (S3)*

Cross-References


C20250

Versus (1)

← Versus: Checklist (3) | Versus vs. Checklist →


Cross Reference

Versus: Checklist:

  • indexed under other formulation

This Universe vs. Imaginary Universe**

Thing vs. Process**

Thing-in-itself vs. System**

Thing-in-itself vs. Zero Model**

Thinkable vs. Demonstrable**

Technology vs. Design**

Technology: Nature's vs. Humans'**

Cross-References


C20251

Versus vs. Checklist

← Versus (1) | Versus: Checklist →


Cross Reference

  • indexed under other formulation

Un teachable vs. Teachable*

Unbalanced vs. Balanced*

Unexpected vs. Expected*

Universe vs. Individual*

Cross-References


C20252

Versus: Checklist

← Versus vs. Checklist | Versus Checklist →


Cross Reference

  • indexed under other formulation

Vertex vs. Space

Visualization vs. Ephemeralization*

Vertical vs. Horizontal*

Visible Thermodynamics vs. Invisible Electrodynamics

Volumetric Quanta vs. Structural Quanta*

Cross-References


C20253

Versus Checklist

← Versus: Checklist | Versus: Checklist →


Cross Reference

  • indexed under other formulation

Wheel: Artillery Wheel vs. Wire Wheel

Word: Behaviorist vs. Static**

Wide Arc vs. Local Radius**

World Game vs. Politics**

Words vs. Graphics: Slides**

Withoutness vs. System**

Cross-References


C20254

Versus: Checklist

← Versus Checklist | Versus Checklist →


Cross Reference

  • Indexed under other formulation

Zone vs. Point*

Zero vs. One*

Cross-References


C20255

Versus Checklist

← Versus: Checklist | Vertex →


Cross Reference

Paired Concepts: Checklist

Checkslist

Dichotomizing

Cross-References


C20256

Vertex

← Versus Checklist | Vertex →


Index Entry

"Vertexes are always identified by the nuclear centers of closest-packed sphere aggregates." - Cite RBF marginalis at SYNERGETICS galley #24 at Sec.\hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/200-synergetics#section-223.40223.40 but inadvertently omitted from 1st. Edition text. 11 Oct'73


C20257

Vertex

← Vertex | Vertex →


Index Entry

Vertex:

"A six-trajectory isolation of insideness and outsideness has four interweaving vertexes or prime convergences of the trajectories, and four areal subdivisions of its isolation system and constitute tetrahedra."

  • Cite SYNERGETICS Coordinates, Sec: 210 by RBF 11 Oct. '71, BeyerBound., Penna.

  • Citation at Tetrahedron, 11 Oct.'71


C20258

Vertex

← Vertex | Vertex →


Index Entry

Vertex:

"Edges and vertexes do not come out as the same number systems-- you can describe the world both ways and not be redundant."

  • Citation at Description, 25 Aug'71

  • Cite RBF to Ada, Bear Island, 25 August 1971.


C20259

Vertex

← Vertex | Vertex →


Index Entry

Vertex:

"Spheres are high tide aspects of vertexes. . . . Spheres in closest packing are high tide aspects of vertexes."

  • Cite RBF to EJA, Blackstone Hotel, Chicago, 31 May 1971

  • Citation and context at Tidal, 31 May'71


C20260

Vertex

← Vertex | Vertex →


Index Entry

Vertex:

"The number of vertices are always divisible by four in a structural system."

  • Cite P. PEARCE, Inventory of Concepts, June 1967

VERTEXES: CROSSINGS - SEC. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/500-conceptuality#section-523.03523.03


C20261

Vertex

← Vertex | Vertex →


Cross Reference

Vertex:

"Euler showed that there were lines-- any kind of lines, crooked or not socrooked. He then showed that the pattern of two or more lines crossing one another was completely distinguishable from any single line by itself. We call this crossing, or convergence of lines a Vertex.

"When three or more lines each cross two others, we have enclosures or areas. So Euler had areas, vertexes, and lines which he said were fundamentally unmistakable for one another. Euler showed also that all conceptual experiences which we can pattern, or form, are composed exclusively of three patterning elements: lines, vertexes and areas. They are all that are necessary to analyze and inventory all parts of, as well as all whole, patterns."

-Cite Carbondale-DRAPT IV-41

  • Cite NASA SPEECH, pp. 58-59. Jw'66

Cross-References

  • VERTEXES; CROSSINGS

C20262

Vertex

← Vertex | Vertex →


Index Entry

Vertex:

"Where every vertex is the domain of a sphere we have CLOSEST PACKING."

  • Cite Oregon Lecture #8, p. 289. 12 Jul'62

C20263

Vertex

← Vertex | Vertex →


Index Entry

Vertex:

"Euler said, 'If I have two lines, where the two lines cross is distinctly different from where the lines don't cross.' He called this the vertex, the convergence. He said this is absolute pattern uniqueness."

  • Beta-Oregon Lecture #7, p. 245, 11 Jul'62

  • Citation & context at Pattern Uniqueness, 11 Jul'62

VERTEXES: CROSSINGS - SEC \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/500-conceptuality#section-523.01523.01


C20264

Vertex

← Vertex | Vertex →


Index Entry

Vertex:

"A vertex is in convergence and a face is in divergence."

  • Citation and context at Gravitational System Zone, 14 Jan'55

C20265

Vertex

← Vertex | Vertexial Accounting - Spherical Accounting (2) →


Index Entry

"In topological systems vertexes are finite relationships . . ."


C20266

Vertexial Accounting - Spherical Accounting (2)

← Vertex | Vertexial Advantage →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20267

Vertexial Advantage

← Vertexial Accounting - Spherical Accounting (2) | Vertexial Asymmetry →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20268

Vertexial Asymmetry

← Vertexial Advantage | Vertexial Connections →


Index Entry

Vertexial Asymmetry:

"The tetrakaidecahedron is vertexially asymmetrical, but linearly symmetrical."

  • Citation at Tetrakaidecahedron, 19 Feb'72

C20269

Vertexial Connections

← Vertexial Asymmetry | Vertexial Connections: The Rules of Never-quite-touching →


Index Entry

Vertexial Connections:

"Energy bounces around in triangles working toward the narrowest vertex where the impossibility of more than one line going through any one point at any condition imposes a twist vertex of exit at the corners of all polyhedra. Therefore, all triangles "leak" energy, but no one triangle leaks as much, or as fast, as two of its similar triangles vertexially connected."

  • Cite SYNERGETICS draft at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/900-modelability#section-931.25931.25, Apr '72

C20270

Vertexial Connections: The Rules of Never-quite-touching

← Vertexial Connections | Vertexial Connections (1) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20271

Vertexial Connections (1)

← Vertexial Connections: The Rules of Never-quite-touching | Vertexial Connections (2) →


Cross Reference

Torque at the Center of Convergence

Twist: Local Twist

Cross-References


C20272

Vertexial Connections (2)

← Vertexial Connections (1) | Vertexes - Crossings →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20273

Vertexes - Crossings

← Vertexial Connections (2) | Vertex vs. Face →


Cross Reference

Vertexes - Crossings:

Cross-References


C20274

Vertex vs. Face

← Vertexes - Crossings | Vertexes, Faces & Edges →


Cross Reference

Vertex vs. Face:

Cross-References


C20275

Vertexes, Faces & Edges

← Vertex vs. Face | Vertexes, Faces & Edges (1) →


Index Entry

Vertexes, Faces & Edges:

"In topology we have then a unique aspect that we call a line, not a straight line but an event tracery. When two traceries cross one another we get a fix, which is not to be confused in any way with a noncrossing. Fixes give geographical locations in respect to the system upon which the topological aspects appear.

"When we have a tracery or a plurality of traceries crossing back upon one another to close a circuit, we surround a novent area. Traceries coming back upon themselves produce areas or noventa. The areas, the traces, and the fixes of crossings are never to be confused with one another: all visual experiences are resolved into these three conceptual aspects."


C20276

Vertexes, Faces & Edges (1)

← Vertexes, Faces & Edges | Verteces, Faces & Edges (2) →


Cross Reference

See Crossings, Openings, & Trajectories

Cross-References


C20277

Verteces, Faces & Edges (2)

← Vertexes, Faces & Edges (1) | Vertexes & Nonvertexes (1) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20278

Vertexes & Nonvertexes (1)

← Verteces, Faces & Edges (2) | Vertexes & Nonvertexes (2) →


Cross Reference

Tetrahedron: Inside-outing Of: Visible & Invisible

Vertexes

Tetrahedron: Inside-outing Of: Visible & Invisible Vertexes

Cross-References


C20279

Vertexes & Nonvertexes (2)

← Vertexes & Nonvertexes (1) | Vertexial Spheres →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20280

Vertexial Spheres

← Vertexes & Nonvertexes (2) | Vertexial Spheres →


Index Entry

Vertexial Spheres:

"Since the number of all the vertexes is divisible by two, Linus Pauling was right that sumtotally Universe is always an even number and that you can divide all Universe evenly by pairs of closest packed spheres, as pairs of tangent spheres.

"However, each of the spheres that constitute the vector's inherently two interrelated vertexial spheres are in themselves two unique differentials in spheres: the congruent concave and convex spheres whose respective radiant energy-reflecting properties are so opposedly differentiable as to act respectively as energy Universe's prime diffusers or concentrating transformers; ergo, each sphere is always two spheres."


C20281

Vertexial Spheres

← Vertexial Spheres | Vertexial Symmetry →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20282

Vertexial Symmetry

← Vertexial Spheres | Vertexial Topology →


Cross Reference

Vertexial Symmetry:

Cross-References


C20283

Vertexial Topology

← Vertexial Symmetry | Vertexial Topology →


Index Entry

Vertexial Topology:

"Second powering does not refer to 'squaring' or to surface amplification, but to the number of the system's external vertexes in which equating the second power and the radial or circumferential modular subdivisions of the system (multiplied by the prime number one, if a tetrahedral system; by the prime number two if an octahedral system; by the prime number three, if a triangulated cubical system; and by the prime number five, if an icosahedral system), each multiplied by two, and added to by two will accurately predict the number of superficial points of the system."

  • Cite SYNERGETICS text at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/900-modelability#section-964.20964.20, Aug'71

(Same text appears at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/200-synergetics#section-223.40223.40)


C20284

Vertexial Topology

← Vertexial Topology | Vertexes = Tunings →


Cross Reference

Vertexial Topology:

Of the Topology of Symmetrical Structural Systems:

Principle of

Superficial: Superficiality

Cross-References

  • Prime Number Inherency & Constant Relative Abundance
  • Prime Number Inherency \& Constant Relative Abundance Of the Topology of Symmetrical Structural Systems: Principle of Superficial: Superficiality

C20285

Vertexes = Tunings

← Vertexial Topology | Vertexial Unities (1) →


Cross Reference

Vertexes = Tunings:

Cross-References


C20286

Vertexial Unities (1)

← Vertexes = Tunings | Vertexial Unities (2) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20287

Vertexial Unities (2)

← Vertexial Unities (1) | Vertex-vortex Rotations (1) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20288

Vertex-vortex Rotations (1)

← Vertexial Unities (2) | Vertex (1) →


Cross Reference

Vertex-vortex Rotations:

Cross-References


C20289

Vertex (1)

← Vertex-vortex Rotations (1) | Vertex (2) →


Cross Reference

Touch = tex of Vertex

Face Congruence with Opposite Vertex

Cross-References


C20290

Vertex (2)

← Vertex (1) | Vertex Vertexial (3) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20291

Vertex Vertexial (3)

← Vertex (2) | Vertical is to Live: Horizontal is to Die →


Cross Reference

Vertexes = Crossings

Cross-References


C20292

Vertical is to Live: Horizontal is to Die

← Vertex Vertexial (3) | Vertical: Verticality →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20293

Vertical: Verticality

← Vertical is to Live: Horizontal is to Die | Vertol →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20294

Vertol

← Vertical: Verticality | Vessel →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20295

Vessel

← Vertol | Vessel (1) →


Index Entry

"Inspired by nature's nut, mollusk, egg, and vegetable shells, men learned, hundreds of milleniums ago, how to hollow out or build up and bind together hydraulic containers or vessels. Learning gradually how to expand the vessel-making art, men finally hollowed out largelogs and then later shaped and tied together tree planks, later bent around stout frames. They pitch-sealed the seams between planks to exclude, rather than include, the hydraulic element, as had their earlier water-holding vessel, the vase-- yes, short for vessel.

"Vessels represent man's discovery not only of the generalized principles governing stabilized separations of liquids and gases anywhere locally in Universe, but also of the generalized solution of local environment pattern-controlling by man within the otherwise frequently hostile, if not lethal, environment event patterning of total energetic Universe. Vessels embrace the fundamental principle of finite local system mathematics. Vessels, as systems, divide the Universe into two main parts-- the withinness and the withoutness."


C20296

Vessel (1)

← Vessel | Vessel (2) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20297

Vessel (2)

← Vessel (1) | Vibrant: Vibration (1) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References

  • Environmental Control Valve, 1954

C20298

Vibrant: Vibration (1)

← Vessel (2) | Vicarious →


Cross Reference

See Notes & Quarks as basic Notes, (3)

Cross-References

  • Notes \& Quarks as basic Notes, (3)

C20299

Vicarious

← Vibrant: Vibration (1) | Vices →


Cross Reference

Vicarious:

Cross-References


C20300

Vices

← Vicarious | Victrola →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20301

Victrola

← Vices | Video Cassette Documentaries (1) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20302

Video Cassette Documentaries (1)

← Victrola | Video Videotapes (3) →


Cross Reference

Video Cassette: Video Cassette Documentaries:

Words, 17 Jul'73

Cross-References


C20303

Video Videotapes (3)

← Video Cassette Documentaries (1) | Vietnam Vietnam War →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20304

Vietnam Vietnam War

← Video Videotapes (3) | View & Review →


Cross Reference

Transnational Capitalism, (2)(3)

Export of Know-how, (2)(3)

Cross-References


C20305

View & Review

← Vietnam Vietnam War | View →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20306

View

← View & Review | Village →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20307

Village

← View | Vine Vines →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20308

Vine Vines

← Village | Viral Steerability →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20309

Viral Steerability

← Vine Vines | Viral Steerability →


Index Entry

Viral Steerability.

"Talking about the synergy of synergies we find over and over again that precession is not predicted by mass attraction; the chemical compounds are not prophesied by the atoms; the biological protoplasm is not predicted by the chemical compounds and the design of the elephant or the pine tree is not predicted by the protoplasm. We know there is DNA and RNA, of which any one set of those form a special case: they don't carry the general capability. They don't tell us why the protoplasm could be elephant or pine tree. Viral steerability is angle-frequency design. There's no question about it. It is a specific set of cases and it has its four fundamental constituents-- its two pairs. . . Third pairs, which are upside down, are GCTA. . . We know the code, but we don't know how it comes out elephant. . . The complementarity of the holisticness of it would balance out. And so an elephant does walk and its not something left over with some gaps in it. That's how it is with DNA and RNA."

  • Cite tape transcript excerpts, RBF to EJA and BOR, Chicago, 31 May 1971.

C20310

Viral Steerability

← Viral Steerability | Viral Steerability: Tetranelix →


Index Entry

Viral Steerability: Angle-Frequency Design Control:

"We know that there is DNA and RNA, any one genetic code of which dictates both a species and within it an individual or special-case formulation. DNA-RNA codes do not explain why the protoplasm could produce either an elephant, pine tree, or daisy. What we call viral steerability as produced by the DNA-RNA codes is simply our familiar and generalized angle-frequency design control."

  • Cite RBF at SIMS, U. Mass., Amherst, 22, p. 22, 22 July '71, as rewritten by RBF Aug '71 and incorporated at Synergetics text, Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/1000-omnitopology#section-1050.021050.02, Apr. '72.

C20311

Viral Steerability: Tetranelix

← Viral Steerability | Viral Steerability: Tetrahelix (1) →


Index Entry

The four chemical compounds-- guanidine,etc., whose first letters are G, C, T, and A, of which DNA always consists, in various paired code pattern sequences such as GC, GC, CG, AT, TA, GC (in which A and T are always paired as are G and C) are demonstrable by equivalent variations of the four individually unique spherical radii of two unique pairs of spheres which may be centered at the four tetrahedra vertexes giving the tetrahedra four unique asymmetries in any variation of series which will result in the steerability of the shaping of the tetranelix prototypes all of which can account for the pattern controls effected in all biological structures by DNA.


C20312

Viral Steerability: Tetrahelix (1)

← Viral Steerability: Tetranelix | Viral Steerability: Tetrahelix (2) →


Index Entry

Viral Steerability: Tetrahelix:.

"Now one of the main important characteristics of DNA is that we have in the DNA helix a patterning instruction. There is a coding of four principal chemical compounds:-- GCTA. They find that all the instructions for the designing of all the patterns known to biological life is contained in GCTA, which will sometimes read GCCCGCATATTA. These are the four letters that are used and they govern all the coding of all the life structures. They know that one of these codings, then, makes a parent /apparent?. . ._/ and then there is some kind of zipping that occurs where there is a dichotomy and the new life breaks off from the old pattern with a perfect imprint and repeats the other./ It is quite interesting that in these helixes you have the ability for them to literally nest by virtue of the spring, so that even though one is being imprinted by the other, it is not because one is a negative column and the other a positive column. They are all the same columns and yet they nest. Therefore, the other column, when it comes off, is a replica of the original column. They also found there is a tendency in the dichotomy to unzip:for the new life printed by the old life to unzip itself from the previous life-- so we have found in this model so far a tendency to unzip, to primp, and there is a coincidence of


C20313

Viral Steerability: Tetrahelix (2)

← Viral Steerability: Tetrahelix (1) | Viral Stereability: Tetrahelix →


Index Entry

Viral Steerability: Tetrahelix:

"the ten increments per cycle that was also in the Watson-Crick chemistry. I don't mildly even imply that I am giving you the picture of it; and yet this is the kind of tantalizing confrontation that I have come to have-- many times when I seem to be in the right area."

  • Cite Oregon Lecture #6, p.200, 6 Jul'62

C20314

Viral Stereability: Tetrahelix

← Viral Steerability: Tetrahelix (2) | Viral Steerability →


Index Entry

"We inaugurate exploration with our theorem of omniuniverse tetrahedral structuring. Whereas Van't Hoff showed that all inorganic chemical structuring is tetrahedronally configured in vertexial linkage and Pauling's X-ray diffraction analyses show omnitetrahedral configuration interlinkages of gravitational centers of compounded atoms in all metals analyzed our omnitetrahedral structuring as a triple-bonded linear tetrahedral array may coincide with the DNA helix, and the tetra's four unique quanta corners may explain DNA's dichotomy transferred T,A; G,C patterning control of all biological species reproductions."

  • Cite OMNIDIRECTIONAL HALO, p. 161, 1960

C20315

Viral Steerability

← Viral Stereability: Tetrahelix | Virgin →


Cross Reference

DNA: RNA

Cross-References


C20316

Virgin

← Viral Steerability | Virgin →


Index Entry

Virgin:

"A virgin is a generalization. A special case cannot be virgin. Virgin is another way of saying eternity.

"Virgin is an unused angle: the 'V' is an angle, an unoccupied angle. A male is convex and a female concave. You cannot really have concavity without convexity, so virginity is eternal."

  • Cite RBF to EJA, 3200 Idaho, Wash, DC, 8 Apr'75

C20317

Virgin

← Virgin | Virgin →


Index Entry

"Virgin identifies the topological insideness aspect of the coincidental insideness-outsideness of all generalized systems independently differentiated from all the macrocosmos Universe outside the virgin's system and all the microcosm Universe inside the virgin and the little of the cosmos Universe with which the virgin imaginably differentiates the outsideness from the insideness.

"And virgin is half a system because unity is plural and at minimum two; the virgin being the prime insideness of concavity to be dimensionally or experientially and operationally realized only by special-case-recognized congruence of the convex outsideness with the inside concavity."


C20318

Virgin

← Virgin | Virgin - Primitive →


Index Entry

There can be no special case generalized virgins.

  • Citation & context at Primitive Regeneration, 27 Dec'74

C20319

Virgin - Primitive

← Virgin | Virgin = Unused Angle →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20320

Virgin = Unused Angle

← Virgin - Primitive | Virgin →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20321

Virgin

← Virgin = Unused Angle | Virtue →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20322

Virtue

← Virgin | Virus →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20323

Virus

← Virtue | Virus →


RBF Definitions

"... Frequency to the second power times ten plus two: is the number of balls in any given layer. This simple formula governing the rate at which balls are agglomerated around other balls or shells in closest packing is an elegant manifest of the reliably incisive transactions, formings and transformings of universe. I made that discovery and published it in 1944. This is the mathematics which the molecular biologists have confirmed and developed by virtue of which we can predict the number of nodes in the external protein shells of all the viruses, within which shells are housed the DNA-RNA programmed design controls of all the biological species and individuals within those species. Although the polio virus is quite different from the common cold virus, and both are different from other viruses, all of them employ frequency to the second power times ten plus two in producing those most powerful structural enclosures of all the biological regeneration of life. It is the power of these geodesic-sphere shells that makes so lethal those viruses unfriendly to man. 'they are almost indestructible.'

Citations

  1. RBF marginalia, New York, 19 June 1971, to Synergetics draft, Section \href{https://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/200-synergetics#section-222.32}{222.32}.43

C20324

Virus

← Virus | Virus →


Index Entry

Virus:

"Viruses,

The smallest organized structures

Exhibiting 'life'

May be classified either

As inanimate or animate,

As crystalline or 'cellular' forms."

  • Cite HOW LITTLE, p. 72, Oct'66

C20325

Virus

← Virus | Virus: Viral Structures: Virology (1) →


Index Entry

Virus:

"I put 'animate' and 'inanimate' in quotes as their previously assumed identification with life and nonlife respectively, has been experimentally discovered to be invalid as the two overlap throughout the virus structures. The viruses may be described as entirely animate or entirely inanimate."

  • Citation and context at Animate & Inanimate, Jun'66

  • Cite NASA Speech, p. 58, Jun'66


C20326

Virus: Viral Structures: Virology (1)

← Virus | Virus Viral Structures Virology (2) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20327

Virus Viral Structures Virology (2)

← Virus: Viral Structures: Virology (1) | Viscosity →


Cross Reference

Omnidirectional Closest Packing of Spheres: Syner-

getics Principle Of: (2)(3)

4 Apr'73

Cross-References


C20328

Viscosity

← Virus Viral Structures Virology (2) | Visibility →


Index Entry

Viscosity:

"Liquids are noncompressible: you find that if you put tetrahedra edge-to-edge that you cannot compress them any more. The coherence of the liquid's viscosity is twice that of the gases inherently."

  • Cite Tape transcript RBF to EJA and BO'R, Chicago, 31 May 1971.

C20329

Visibility

← Viscosity | Visibility →


Index Entry

Visibility:

"The outbound, tetrahedrally-packaged, fractional point works toward and reaches the inherent visibility phases of radiation."


C20330

Visibility

← Visibility | Visibility →


Index Entry

Visibility:

"... Nature takes two complete 360-degree angular

tucks in the illusory infinity of a plane to render

systems locally and visibly finite. The

difference between visually finite systems and illusory

infinity is two."

(RBF added the two underlined words to Synergetics draft

Secton \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/200-synergetics#section-224.02224.02)

  • Cite RBF Synergetics marginalia- 19 June 1971.

C20331

Visibility

← Visibility | Visible & Invisible →


Index Entry

Visibility:

"Visibility . . . is local and temporary."

  • Reconstructed from SYNERGETICS text, Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/600-structure#section-614.081614.081. 1971

C20332

Visible & Invisible

← Visibility | Visibility & Invisibility of Systems (1) →


Index Entry

Visible & Invisible:

"Conceptuality is something independent of visibility or invisibility."

  • Citation & context at Conceptuality Independent of Size, 9 Jul'62

  • Cite Oregon Lecture #5, p. 189. 9 Jul'62


C20333

Visibility & Invisibility of Systems (1)

← Visible & Invisible | Visibility & Invisibility of Systems (2) →


Index Entry

There are six uniquely differentiable components of all systems and of all thoughts: (1) insideness; (2) outsideness; and (3) (4) (5) (6) the four star events that do the defining of the insideness and the outsideness, which inadvertently display

-- six interrelationships, which, in turn, inadvertently define

-- four triangles; which, again inadvertently define

-- the four areas (openings) of most economical omni-inter-relationships between the triangles' edge-defining lines that definingly exclude the macro-outsideness and definingly include the micro-insideness.

There are six parts of Universe and four of them are always humanly conceptualizable and always define the successively considerable domains of human thought, while the other two of the six cosmic parts are always invisible; i.e., the ultra-macro tunable otherness and the infra-micro tunable otherness.

  • Cite SYNERGETICS, 2nd. Ed. at Secs. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/400-system#section-400.71400.71-\hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/400-system#section-400.72400.72, 16 May'75

C20334

Visibility & Invisibility of Systems (2)

← Visibility & Invisibility of Systems (1) | Visibility & Invisibility of Systems →


Index Entry

Visibility & Invisibility of Systems:

"The visibility of conceptuality is always so preoccupying of human senses and minds as to render spontaneously forgettable our only-progressively-acquired knowledge of the vast ranges of the know-to-exist but nonsimultaneously tunable, ergo invisible, otherness of scenario Universe."

  • Cite SYNERGETICS, 2nd. Ed. at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/400-system#section-400.73400.73, 16 May'75

C20335

Visibility & Invisibility of Systems

← Visibility & Invisibility of Systems (2) | Visible & Invisible (1) →


Index Entry

The three aspects of systems are (a) insideness, (b) outsideness, and (c) the four star events which do the defining of the insideness and the outsideness, which inadvertently, have

-- six interrelationships; and

-- for triangles, which exclude the macro-outside-ness and include the micro-insideness.

"Therefore there are six parts of Universe and two of them are always invisible. There is an inherent twoness in the invisible macro and micro. The four visible parts define the system."


C20336

Visible & Invisible (1)

← Visibility & Invisibility of Systems | Visible & Invisible (2) →


Cross Reference

Tetrahedron: Inside-outing of Tetrahedron:

Visible & Invisible Vertexes

Tetrahedron: Visible & Invisible Chordal Arcs

Cross-References


C20337

Visible & Invisible (2)

← Visible & Invisible (1) | Visible to Invisible (1) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20338

Visible to Invisible (1)

← Visible & Invisible (2) | Visible to Invisible (2) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20339

Visible to Invisible (2)

← Visible to Invisible (1) | Visible Light vs. Electricity →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20340

Visible Light vs. Electricity

← Visible to Invisible (2) | Visible Spectrum →


Index Entry

Visible Light vs. Electricity:

"Visible light is a pushed phase of radiation and is limited to relatively short distances through atmosphere and required enormous power to push it, while what we call electricity is tensed or pulled radiation and the distances over which radiation can be drawn by wire is very great compared to searchlight beaming."

  • Citation & context at Wind Stress & Houses,(10), 1946

C20341

Visible Spectrum

← Visible Light vs. Electricity | Visible Synergetics →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20342

Visible Synergetics

← Visible Spectrum | Visible Thermodynamics vs Invisible Electrodynamics →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20343

Visible Thermodynamics vs Invisible Electrodynamics

← Visible Synergetics | Visible: Visibility (1) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20344

Visible: Visibility (1)

← Visible Thermodynamics vs Invisible Electrodynamics | Visibility (2) →


Cross Reference

Geoscope = World Looks at Itself

Half Visible

Cross-References


C20345

Visibility (2)

← Visible: Visibility (1) | Vision vs. Speech →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20346

Vision vs. Speech

← Visibility (2) | Visual →


Index Entry

Vision vs. Speech:

"Vision is unlimited universal language; speech is local and limited."


C20347

Visual

← Vision vs. Speech | Visual →


Index Entry

Visual: preponderantly sensing the radiating-deflecting-reflecting, unbonding-rebonding, atom and molecule energy export state, including all those ultratactile, humanly-tune-in-able frequency ranges of electromagnetic wave phenomena.

  • Cite SYNERGETICS 2 draft at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/100-synergy#section-100.020100.020; 22 Feb'77

C20348

Visual

← Visual | Visual Music →


RBF Definitions

Euler differentiated all physical Universe into lines, crossings, and areas; the fundamental visual aspects of our experiences having to do with our eyes, radiation frequencies and conceptual images."

(10)


C20349

Visual Music

← Visual | Visual Symphony (1) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20350

Visual Symphony (1)

← Visual Music | Visual Symphony (2) →


Index Entry

Visual Symphony:

"What World Game does have is confrontations... in terms of sounds, words, and languages. When we had the radio, it was only words. People are going to say that in the television there is only an embellishment: the fact that you can see, and nothing more. We can only shout a half mile. Words are in all languages, special languages. But sight is a universal language. A person goes to a horse race in Japan and on TV it's the same thing. This is not like radio at all. I can see 700 million miles an hour and I can hear only 700 miles an hour. The step-up to sight was a millionfolding.

"The information that TV really gives to people; when there's a program there the kids are feeling the dancing, and feeling the gravity. And this is informing them in ways that they have no idea of how they are really being informed. And World Game has to work this way.

"You can listen to a symphony, but you can only hear one set of chords at a time. It takes you an hour to wait and hear the whole symphony. In sum total they have only so many notes in "

  • Cite Tape #3, pp.7-8; RBF to W. Wolf, Phila., PA, 15 Jun'74

C20351

Visual Symphony (2)

← Visual Symphony (1) | Vision Visual (1) →


Index Entry

Visual Symphony:

"the symphony, maybe five or ten thousand, whatever it is. You look at the sky and you're looking at a symphony that took over a million years. You're looking simultaneously at events that took place a million years ago. We forget that sight is incredible. World Game is a visualization of so much that is not otherwise visible.

"You have to realize that every thing I do is synergetic and has to be talked about only in terms of the big complex. Thepoint is that man cannot see the very limited spectrum of motion and change. He can't see the stars moving from the distances where they are, an incredible distance, the motion rate at which they are moving; he can't see the tree grow. And if he doesn't see something in motion, coming at him, he doesn't get out of the way. But it is possible to step-up and step-down, so that he can suddenly see all these things coming together to WHAM!... and that's exactly what World Game is: it's always visual.... You have this slow playback. The point is that World Game can make visible what was not visible in the statistics or in curves."


C20352

Vision Visual (1)

← Visual Symphony (2) | Vision Visual (2) →


Cross Reference

Eye Comprehendibility

Television: TV: Omnidirectional TV Set

Cross-References


C20353

Vision Visual (2)

← Vision Visual (1) | Vitalistics →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20354

Vitalistics

← Vision Visual (2) | Vitalistics (3) →


Index Entry

Vitalistics:

"At the outset, certain new words must be introduced, among which are vitalistics to replace the dead word statistics, and mobilata to supersede data. These substitutions are necessary in order to incorporate a time element and to make allowance for the constant adjustment of figures into the meanings of the words. Statistics are static, time-less, the blinding dust of death. Vitalistics and mobilata, on the other hand are appropriately used in connection with a cosmic inventory because scientific events and corrections may cause a one hundred percent amplification or refinement in our cosmic inventory even before the manuscript reciting the items can be printed."

  • Cite NINE CHAINS, p. 47, 1938

C20355

Vitalistics (3)

← Vitalistics | Vizier Grand Vizier →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20356

Vizier Grand Vizier

← Vitalistics (3) | Vocabulary →


Cross Reference

Vizier: Grand Vizier:

Cross-References


C20357

Vocabulary

← Vizier Grand Vizier | Vocabulary (1) →


RBF Definitions

"With our present large vocabulary inheritance we squander meanings on unworthy causes and communicate little that needs to be said. 'Shazam.' 'Now, off with these clothes.' 'What goes up must come down.'"

Citations

  1. I SEEM TO BE A VERB, Queen, May '70 (Not in Bantam edition)

C20358

Vocabulary (1)

← Vocabulary | Vocabulary (2) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20359

Vocabulary (2)

← Vocabulary (1) | Void (1) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20360

Void (1)

← Vocabulary (2) | Void (2) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20361

Void (2)

← Void (1) | Volitiona (1) →


Cross Reference

Allspace Filling:ahedron & VE, Oct

Cross-References


C20362

Volitiona (1)

← Void (2) | Volitions (2) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20363

Volitions (2)

← Volitiona (1) | Volume →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20364

Volume

← Volitions (2) | Volume →


RBF Definitions

"A volume cannot have an interior point. A volume is minimal. A volume can have no subdivisions."

Citations

  1. RBF to EJA, Fairfield Conn., Ches Wolf. 18 June 1971.

C20365

Volume

← Volume | Volume →


Index Entry

Volume:

"VOLUME - 3rd power volumetric quanta."

  • Cite DEFINITIONS FOR SYNERGETICS BY PETER PEARCE, May'67

C20366

Volume

← Volume | Volumetric Annihilation →


Index Entry

"The volumes of the first four polyhedra are as follows:

tetrahedron 1

cube 3

octahedron 4

vector equilibrium 20

"Because these metric values are rational (values that can be expressed as a ratio of a whole number), all the derivative, complex, symmetrical polyhedra geometries" of Synergetics " are rational when expressed 'tetrahedrally' rather than 'cubically.'"

(Adapted.)

  • Cite MARKS, pp 47-48, 1960

C20367

Volumetric Annihilation

← Volume | Volumetric Annihilation →


Index Entry

Volumetric Annihilation:

"The octahedron provides an example of volumetric annihilation when you remove one vector and reduce the figure to three tetrahedra triple-bonded. This also reduces from the volumetric value of four to the volumetric value of three. The process is, of course, reversible."

  • Cite RBF marginalia and Sketch #1 on p.3, SYNERGETICS draft, 28 Feb'71

C20368

Volumetric Annihilation

← Volumetric Annihilation | Volumetric Annihilation →


Index Entry

"Volumetric annihilation is simple precession -- the falling in from critical proximity."

  • Cite RBF to EJA

Beverly Hotel, New York

28 Feb 1971


C20369

Volumetric Annihilation

← Volumetric Annihilation | Volumetric Awareness →


Cross Reference

Volumetric Annihilation:

Cross-References


C20370

Volumetric Awareness

← Volumetric Annihilation | Volumetric Domain Unity →


Index Entry

Volumetric Awareness:

"Not until we have four othernesses do we have macrocosmic volumetric awareness. Four is required for substantive awareness, where you can have a collection of things you can touch."

  • Cite SYNERGETICS draft at Sec. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/1000-omnitopology#section-1023.191023.19, 20 Feb'73

C20371

Volumetric Domain Unity

← Volumetric Awareness | Volume-energy Ratios →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20372

Volume-energy Ratios

← Volumetric Domain Unity | Volumetric Hierarchy (1) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20373

Volumetric Hierarchy (1)

← Volume-energy Ratios | Volumetric Hierarchy (2) →


Index Entry

Volumetric Hierarchy:

"What Michael Berz is discovering here and what I had discovered and incorporated in the Kepler-like drawing of concentric symmetrical geometries of the 12 spheres surrounding the nuclear sphere (Fig. \hrefhttps://www.buckyverse.org/en/synergetics/content/chapters/900-modelability#section-982.61982.61) and all the other well-known symmetrical systems which I showed in the chart, which occurs below my drawing showing that the central sphere has a volume of and the central sphere is in fact the spherical icosahedron, giving complete rational value to the sphere in the terms of the vector equilibrium's 20-ness, the octahedron's fourness, the rhombic dodecahedron's sixness, the cube's threeness and the tetrahedron's oneness. This particular drawing and the hierarchy of volumes I consider to be the most important single contribution of the whole book, 'Synergetics.'

"This is why I felt devastated by the lack of color as well as the separation of the drawing from the hierarchical chart which itself had been done in color. This is the very essence of what Kepler's great drawing hoped to discover but failed to do so because of his assumption of the cube for volumetric unity.

  • Cite RBF ltr. to EJA, 13 Nov'75

C20374

Volumetric Hierarchy (2)

← Volumetric Hierarchy (1) | Volumetric Hierarchy →


Index Entry

What Michael, with his thorough reading of 'Synergetics,' missed the significance of my drawing and its elsewhere included hierarchical chart and felt that he was making a discovery that the difference between the rhombic dodecahedron (the spheric) and what he callsthe small vector equilibrium five, is exactly the volume of one tetrahedron.


C20375

Volumetric Hierarchy

← Volumetric Hierarchy (2) | Volumetric Intervaluations →


Cross Reference

Volumetric Hierarchy:

Cross-References


C20376

Volumetric Intervaluations

← Volumetric Hierarchy | Volume-number Ratios →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20377

Volume-number Ratios

← Volumetric Intervaluations | Volumes = Powers →


Cross Reference

Volume-number Ratios:

Cross-References


C20378

Volumes = Powers

← Volume-number Ratios | Volumetric Quantum →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20379

Volumetric Quantum

← Volumes = Powers | Volume-quanta Ratios →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20380

Volume-quanta Ratios

← Volumetric Quantum | Volume-structure Ratios →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20381

Volume-structure Ratios

← Volume-quanta Ratios | Volume-surface Hierarchy →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20382

Volume-surface Hierarchy

← Volume-structure Ratios | Volume-Surface Relationship (1) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20383

Volume-Surface Relationship (1)

← Volume-surface Hierarchy | Volume-surface Ratio (2) →


Cross Reference

Container Structuring: Volume-surface Ratios

Cross-References


C20384

Volume-surface Ratio (2)

← Volume-Surface Relationship (1) | Volumetric Unity →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20385

Volumetric Unity

← Volume-surface Ratio (2) | Volumetric Unity (1) →


Index Entry

Volumetric Unity:

"If we try to express it in terms of cube as unity, which has the number three, then these others would come out unevenly because due to the irrationality that the three would bring about in relation to the others. When we start with the tetrahedron as unity, then the cube comes out even. These are all whole rational numbers. It is an extraordinary sublime relationship."

  • Cite RBF to Verner Smythe, NYC, Reel 2, p.3, 11 Mar'69

C20386

Volumetric Unity (1)

← Volumetric Unity | Volumetric Unity (2) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20387

Volumetric Unity (2)

← Volumetric Unity (1) | Volume-Weight Relationship (1) →


Cross Reference

Icosahedron & Vector-edged Cube, 11 Mar'69

Cross-References


C20388

Volume-Weight Relationship (1)

← Volumetric Unity (2) | Volume-weight Relationship (2) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20389

Volume-weight Relationship (2)

← Volume-Weight Relationship (1) | Volume (1) →


Cross Reference

CGS: Cgts System, 7 Oct'71

Cross-References


C20390

Volume (1)

← Volume-weight Relationship (2) | Volume Volumetric (2) →


Cross Reference

Constant Volumes Model

Energy & Volume

Cross-References


C20391

Volume Volumetric (2)

← Volume (1) | Volume (3) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20392

Volume (3)

← Volume Volumetric (2) | Voluntary & Involuntary →


Cross Reference

Volume-Energy Ratios: Manifest & Potential

Cross-References


C20393

Voluntary & Involuntary

← Volume (3) | Voluntary & Involuntary →


RBF Definitions

"Being born is involuntary

Directional stone throwing is voluntary.

Life's first event being involuntary,

The game of life's order of play

Is involuntarily initiated

And is inherently subject to modification

by the a priori mystery

Within which consciousness has emerged."

Citations

  1. INTUITION, Draft Feb. '71, p. 1.

C20394

Voluntary & Involuntary

← Voluntary & Involuntary | Voluntary & Involuntary →


Index Entry

Voluntary & Involuntary:

"We may say that experiences are involuntary or voluntary.

'Involuntary' comes first, which is the way life is.

Birth is involuntary."

  • Cite RBF to EJA re definition of

'Universe' in SYNERGETICS

Beverly Hotel, New York

28 Feb '71


C20395

Voluntary & Involuntary

← Voluntary & Involuntary | Voluntary & Involuntary (1) →


Index Entry

Voluntary & Involuntary:

"My definition of Universe includes both the objective and the subjective: i.e., all voluntary experiences-- i.e., experiments-- as well as all involuntary experiences-- i.e., all Happenings."

  • Citation & context at Happening, 20 Jun'66

C20396

Voluntary & Involuntary (1)

← Voluntary & Involuntary | Voluntary & Involuntary (2) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20397

Voluntary & Involuntary (2)

← Voluntary & Involuntary (1) | Voluntary →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20398

Voluntary

← Voluntary & Involuntary (2) | Voodoo →


Cross Reference

Elective

Volition

Cross-References


C20399

Voodoo

← Voluntary | Vortex (1) →


Cross Reference

Voodoo:

Cross-References


C20400

Vortex (1)

← Voodoo | Vortex (1) →


Cross Reference

Cross-References

  • Vertex-vortex

C20401

Vortex (1)

← Vortex (1) | Voting →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20402

Voting

← Vortex (1) | Vulnerability →


Cross Reference

Cross-References


C20403

Vulnerability

← Voting | W →


Index Entry

Vulnerability:

"Without vulnerability there is no courage."

  • Cite RBF to EJA, Royal Scot Restaurant, N.Y. 14 Sept. 1971.

C20404